Hon. Kim R. Hubbard See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Orange County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.4 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Kim R. Hubbard


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA13162
Rating:2.8
Comments:
Judge Hubbard is basically a smart and moral judge but can't control her temper. It affects her rulings on evidentiary objections and is very disruptive. She thinks nothing of insulting and denigrating attorneys. She is somewhat better with pro per parties, although still condescending. Often she is so focused on her rage that she is missing important details of the case. While I have never seen focus on anger affect her judgment, I would not be surprised if it has or does in the future. I would steer clear if you can, she's too volatile and unpredictable.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11830
Rating:1.4
Comments:
Rude, ambitious, and not at all scholarly. Lacks compassion.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11829
Rating:3.0
Comments:
Temperamental appears not to read the Investigation Reports.