Hon. Nathan R. Scott See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Orange County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.9 - 8 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Nathan R. Scott


Comments


Court Staff

Comment #: CA6238
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Unprofessional and biased against women.
Immature and does not know what he is doing.
Disregard for the law.
Unfair.
Biased.
Racist.

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: CA6237
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Immature, foolish, Inept, unsophisticated, nervous judge who seems unsure of himself at all times. Biased and unfair. Goes against cps advice and federally mandated reporters warnings. Immature.

Litigant

Comment #: CA6235
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Join he class action lawsuit to disbar this judge

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: CA6234
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Call the California bar and get this judge disbarred ASAP.

Litigant

Comment #: CA6233
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Disbar this judge.

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: CA6232
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Recuse yourself sir from your seat. Shameful bias towards men and blatant disregard for the health and welfare of minors.
Class action to disbar this judge imminent.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA6231
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Disgraceful uneven distribution of justice.
Disbar this judge before a child is killed under his watch.
How did this judge get appointed? He is a disgrace to all Hispanics everywhere. Morally bankrupt.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA6230
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Demonstrates extreme bias against women and has no consideration for the safety or welfare of minor children.
Has this judge been investigated to see he many children have died under his watch?

Court Staff

Comment #: CA6229
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Based and does not provide fair and equitable justice to women.

Court Staff

Comment #: CA6228
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Not fair, biased against women. Racist. Masochist. Where did this judge come from he is illiterate and irrational.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA6227
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Disbar this judge

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4960
Rating:1.3
Comments:
He is very insecure in himself and how he is being viewed by older attorneys, to the point where he can get defensive and lash out. He makes too many mistakes.