Hon. David M. Chapman See Rating Details
Superior Court
Riverside County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.0 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. David M. Chapman


Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: CA7998
Judge Chapman is a public employee as well as a public figure and therefore, based on his recent ruling, he must feel that his right to privacy is less important that someone else's first amendment right to gossip about his private matters.
I wonder how he and his family would feel would feel if his personal health record became public without his permission?

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA6997
Even though Judge Chapman ruled against my client in a bench trial, I would try a case before him again in a heartbeat. He was always prepared, his tentatives were well-reasoned, and even when I disagreed with his rulings, he supported them. As a trial judge, he is very active in questioning counsel and witnesses, which showed me he was invested in the matter as the trier of fact.