Hon. Tami R. Bogert See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Sacramento County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.3 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Tami R. Bogert


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA9682
Rating:2.3
Comments:
One of the worst family judges currently on the bench. She totally destroyed my client's 11 year old son's life. In open court she repeatedly chastised my client for discussing with her son why he had had to go to Family Court Services. Her son's biological father who ran as soon as "his bitch" got "knocked up" had returned from 9 years in prison and demanded full custody. My client was married just after her son was born and that man had raised her son as his. My client had not yet discussed his biological father with her son and did not want the first discussion to come from a FCS mediator. Judge Bogert called it "bad parenting" for the child's mother to discuss it with her son. After 2 years of fighting any visitation, the biological father dropped his request for custody and laughed about "ruining the boy's life". Bogert showed a complete lack of the law and procedure.

Litigant

Comment #: CA8160
Rating:3.0
Comments:
I found it admirable based on the fact that in my years battling for custody, this is the first female judge I have ever encountered. However, I quickly realized that she sympathized with my abuser, more importantly, my child's abuser. He has been able to manipulate the courts in the last few years and continues to do so. I can see that she judges based on emotion, which is extremely biased.. If I show emotion, I am viewed as weak. But when he shows emotion, there is compassion & sympathy. She made it clear that there is a potential for me to lose custody. Overall, I was greatly disappointed in this female judge who seems to be on a vendetta to favor fathers.