Hon. Donald J. Currier See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Sacramento County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.1 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Donald J. Currier


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA24182
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Ignores documents. Baised. Rude. Hides behind his gravel. Takes mediation recommendations as his owns. Does not follow orders. Makes untrue statements. Does make make orders in the best interest of children.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA19823
Rating:1.1
Comments:
Biased, prejudiced and possibly racist. He ignores documents amd prima facie facts of cases for people he doesnt like and will screw up everything and present a misrepresentation of the actual events of a trial in his ruling to protrct his incompetence and his bias. Either his memory is failing or he misrepresents facts on purpose. His statements in hos decisions are on its face biased and discriminatory

Litigant

Comment #: CA14167
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Openly biased against pro se parties. Rubber stamps FCS mediator recommendations. Makes findings in contradiction to documented facts in order to rule in favor of parties represented by temporary judges.

Litigant

Comment #: CA7242
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Bias and prejudice. Ignores Grand Jury findings of the crooked Citrus Heights Redlight camera system