Hon. Cheryl C. Kersey See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Bernardino County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.1 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   4.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Cheryl C. Kersey


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA11662
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Well I've been trying to submit proper documentation to have my appearance on 8 817 be done via Court call. Spoke with Christy and Sherry in Department s54 who are the clerks in judge Cheryl curses courtroom. They are telling me the judge will allow me to appear via Court call but not be allowed to give any testimony. So what would be the point of me even appearing if I'm not allowed to have my day in court and disprove the allegations set forth by Scarlet Wagner who is the petitioner of a restraining order request to be placed on me Seth farmer. I live in Washington state where Scarlet Wagner has also lived and has been arrested six times for domestic violence I have been arrested 0 times for domestic violence in Benton County Washington. She's also got two warrants out of Maricopa County Arizona for two counts of DV that she failed to comply with the terms set forth. She just ran for a second time from her pre-trial date here in Benton County District Court Two-Face her four counts which have now become for active warrants for her arrest. Her and her friend Jason Bishop have defamed my name and my son's name via social media and text messages to my family members claiming some outrageous allegations that I need to be able to defend myself regarding and my son. And not only can I do so but I can do so easily because everything in her paperwork that you guys stamped and signed are nothing but lies which I can disprove with documentation as well as voice recordings and text messages emails Etc. But how am I supposed to keep this restraining order from being made a permanent order if I'm not allowed to give any testimony during my appearance. This is absolutely unacceptable and unethical of any Court in this land. If you allow an outside company to allow people to appear telephonically then you cannot keep them from testifying and giving their testimony and having their day in court to defend themselves of the allegations set forth against them. This is outrageous and I will be taking this all the way to as high as I got to go in order for this wrong to be righted immediately.

Other

Comment #: CA11252
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I had Judge Kersey recently for a custody matter. I also sat in her court room most of the day. From my own experience she was very fair, she took time and listened to my concerns and handled our case accordingly. I feel very pleased that she was my Judge, she seemed very fair and consistent with not only my case but the other cases before mine as well.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA9725
Rating:4.1
Comments:
In my experience Judge Kersey demonstrated extreme sexism and was wildly disrespectful to employees of the District Attorney's Office.

Other

Comment #: CA6748
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
do not vote for a racist that steals black children from their parents and sells them for money

Other

Comment #: CA5707
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge has made racist remarks and derogatory comments and illegally removed my kids for federal money after I filed a 170.6 form with the courts editing and perjury slander defamation of character and assault and personal injury.was not given a fare trial targeted me and my family extortion on me and others

Other

Comment #: CA5706
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge has made racist remarks and derogatory comments and illegally removed my kids for federal money after I filed a 170.6 form with the courts editing and perjury slander defamation of character and assault and personal injury.was not given a fare trial targeted me and my family extortion on me and others