Hon. Alexander R. Martinez See Rating Details
Superior Court
San Bernardino County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.6 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 5 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Alexander R. Martinez



Comment #: CA7288
Refused to allow cross-examination of female petitioner, denied witnesses to testify, refused to require evidence of malicious claims of alleged criminal activity that were alleged to be in a court's record and police records - allowed into record, denied respondent opportunity to testify, made rulings without due diligence of fact finding, was dishonest.

At ease version: this guy is an outlaw and needs to be replaced. He has no regard for ethics or morals much less judicial duty. At right around $180k/yr hes obviously all about the money. "Screw the litigant, NEXT!" seems to be his attitude.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA6066
Judge Martinez works in Family Law. He is very Biased towards anyone who is not a minority. He is very short in temperament and even shorter when if comes to trying to convince him, after he cuts you off while talking and gives his decision. Very rude and judges you before he even gets to know you. I hope this judge gets booted out of office.


Comment #: CA5609
Horribly biased, even with the proof presented to him he didn't even bother listening to the best interest of the children and made his decision before case was even completely presented, on top of that he even went completely into the pro per's side and tried to be the attorney for that party, blatantly advising what to say and do


Comment #: CA5282
Judge is biased and creates his own family law rules. Ignores family law rules. Very rude. Does not read cases before hearing. Also this judge does his own investigation work in some cases.


Comment #: CA5171
Horrifically biased. Cuts off litigants. Gives legal advice to pro per litigants.
Slanderous to people who are not attached to case.Takes hearsay as gospel, fails to read any documents. He needs to be disrobed as family law judge. He has no business dealing with cases where children are involved. Recall this judge.


Comment #: CA4930
This judge is incredibly biased, to the point of being incapable of looking at what's presented to him. I watched him completely ignore the family law code and make up his own rules.