Hon. Katherine A. Bacal See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Diego County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.7 - 6 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   6.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Katherine A. Bacal


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA6750
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is not a good judge. She has below average intelligence. Her demeanor is terrible. She is just rude and mean to everyone. She is not impartial, leaning heavily in favor of defendants. She was a defense attorney for years and believes it is her life's mission to rid the world of meritless cases. But in her opinion everything is meritless. If you are on the plaintiff's side, she will find a way to screw you.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA6593
Rating:1.0
Comments:
A terrible trial judge. Lazy. Horrible demeanor. Very biased and very pro-defendant.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA6592
Rating:2.9
Comments:
Terrible. Not very bright, and displays a condescending demeanor toward counsel, parties and witnesses alike. Paper her.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA6562
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is the worst. After 20 years of practice, it is pretty hard to get to the top of my worst ever list but this judge wins the spot by wide margin. Not smart. Very poor rulings (remarkably consistent on this point). Angry. Hostile. Aggressive. Intolerant. Very pro-defense. Did I mention she is a moron? Kick her if at all possible. Really.

Other

Comment #: CA6404
Rating:6.0
Comments:
She whines and bitches too much.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5830
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is the worst judge ever. Run far and fast. Paper her every time. She has a horrible disposition. She is just a mean and nasty person which would be fine if she were intelligent and made good rulings, but she is not. She always sides with the defense. She has no idea on the law. She is not smart, not diligent and not competent.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4907
Rating:3.3
Comments:
She is very pro-defendant. I watched her grant demurrers without leave to amend, even where leave is required (original complaint). She has granted summary judgments where there are clear disputes of fact. She still thinks that she works at Baker and needs to support the rights of defendants. I was shocked by her general demeanor. She was very cold to plaintiffs in general. I will paper her in the future, and hope for an even-keeled judge.