Hon. David L. Berry See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Diego County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.3 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 6 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. David L. Berry


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA8890
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is definitely biased against women.If you are wealthy you can make him an offer he can't refuse. He doesn't know family law, so your chances of winning on appeal are good. He is pompous, arrogant and rude because he knows he doesn't have a clue about anything family. Why the presiding judge stuck him here is beyond me. Take some classes Berry, 3 years and you still don't know what to do. If you are assigned this judge and you are a woman, file a peremptory challenge IMMEDIATELY.

Other

Comment #: CA8822
Rating:2.0
Comments:
This is MY DIVORCE JUDGE & he is biased against me, a woman. He signed a bogus restraining order against me, based on LIES told to the court by my addict estranged spouse. The judge has no knowledge of Family LAW, which is actually DIVORCE & Child Custody LAW. He messes around with papers, does not know where to sign what, & has clue what is going on in the courtroom. He constantly calls me by my soon to be ex's last name, assuming that ALL WOMEN change their name when WE get married. I do not know why I got stuck with this JUDGE. It is NOT FAIR that one man wields so much POWER over MY life. My lawyer told me he used to be a prosecutor, so the JUDGE knows about criminals, not about divorce. This is what MY TAX DOLLARS PAY FOR. A lousy JUDGE.

Litigant

Comment #: CA8643
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Partial to father's rights despite having proof of disregard for previous court orders that were being ignored by the defendant. (Contempt) Total disregard for recommendation from mediator assigned to the case who did the actual research and interviewing of parties involved. A friend also had this judge assigned to their case and the judge gave full custody to a drug addict father who is now in jail for several years. Does he like a competent judge who looks at facts? Not quite. Not only is the judge the problem, it's the entire system. In the court system, children do not have rights, especially when you are discussing psychological trauma. If there are no signs of physical battery, the court doesn't care. So what do they do? They give incompetent parents custody so the state doesn't get sued by deadbeats and also so they don't waste anymore time on a case than they feel they need to. Who gets screwed over? The children. As another comment stated regarding this judge, he is part of the problem and not the solution.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA7843
Rating:1.3
Comments:
Judge Berry is part of the problem and not the solution.

Other

Comment #: CA7842
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This feedback is for the Hon. David Berry in Dept. 45 of San Diego Superior Court Family Division. I have the unpleasant experience to deal with Judge Berry for over 20 months. This judge is prejudice, and bias against minority men. He did not read evidence presented to him, instead, he kept stalling and dragging the case until finally the case had to go to trial by default. His inability to be neutral makes it impossible to have a fair chance in his court room to present evidence. He shows an unprecedented preference to lawyers in his court room and a very obvious dislike to those who don't have a lawyer. He rules based on preserving his already damaged reputation vs. facts. Shame on Judge Berry

Litigant

Comment #: CA7283
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Judge Berry is by far the best family law judge in San Diego. He has an extremely patient temperament, educates litigants and attorneys in the law and their rights, and commands respect and decorum. Unlike other judges, he follows meticulous procedure and actually reads case files and pleadings. He cares about children and teens and it shows. He understands children and does not have a negative view of them. He cares about judicial economy but his hands are tied in some cases. He has no tolerance for incompetent or unethical attorneys that violate rules of the court. He is an extremely intelligent academic and takes domestic violence seriously.

Litigant

Comment #: CA6781
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This feedback is for the Hon. David Berry in Dept 45 of San Diego Superior Court Family Division. Judge Berry replaced Judge Rosenstein in Dept 45 effective January 2014, and my attorneys and I have been in his Courtroom on at least 15 separate occasions during this short time. Why so many times? Because he's very new to Family Law, indecisive, and gets lost in the emotional testimony every single time versus paying attention to the facts. Sadly, if you have a borderline litigant who tosses a lot of superfluous details at him, he can turn into a negative advocate and stall the case rather than follow the solutions that the professionals are recommending. He's a wildcard and you should avoid him if you can.