Hon. Ana L. España See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Diego County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.1 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Ana L. España


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA9529
Rating:9.1
Comments:
Great judge and a pleasure to be in her courtroom.

Other

Comment #: CA6486
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In a complex case of corruption in south San Diego county which affected three school districts, Espana was--believe it or not--not familiar with the Ed Code, which specified that those convicted of a crime committed connected with their position were required to resign from the school board. Her misdirection muddied the waters and meant that necessary corrections were greatly delayed. She offered no apologies for her ignorance, and was apparently not reprimanded by any judicial authority. She apparently was trying to sweep things under the rug, in a very unprofessional manner. She should not be a judge--if anything, she should return to law school and take some remedial classes