Hon. Gregory W. Pollack See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Diego County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.1 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Gregory W. Pollack


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11491
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This man is not truly qualified to be a judge. Shows blatant bias on a regular basis - Lies openly, regularly, and with a seeming attitude of "and what are you going to do about it then". He looks to find a way to irritate, rules entirely outside of the law whenever he chooses, and generally appears to be the JV team who just should never have made the cut. NOT A GOOD AND DECENT JUDGE! He should retire or be removed.

Other

Comment #: CA11428
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Mr. God Complex - I thought it was just supposed to be doctors??? THE LAW IS THE LAW! Yes - that is whether you like that or not - if you can believe it. It would be more than outstanding for you and everyone who's case is decided by your honorable self, if you agreed with this SIMPLE TRUTH!

Other

Comment #: CA11420
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Thoroughly outraged and disgusted to have been subjected to this judge! Know this - do not wonder if it's true - he is so entirely FOS! Straight creep here, people! 170.6!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA11116
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Brutal - bellicose, and just plain bad Kabuki theater here! Very little - if any legitimate law occurring. EXIT STAGE LEFT PLEASE!

Litigant

Comment #: CA11076
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Just the worse, pure and simple! Shocking, really, that it gets this bad. San Diego's deep embarrassment!

Litigant

Comment #: CA11065
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
People who can't support the legal conclusions they come to should either make appropriate legal conclusions or admit that they cannot support the ones that they choose to make. Hiding behind 10 second technicalities is truly lame! Yes, 2+2 still equals 4. Just ridiculously lame - period!

Other

Comment #: CA11063
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In the Crystal Harris v. Harris and Feeney v. Feeney cases: This judge proved he does NOT like women, favors certain expert witnesses and other court whores and attorneys, even when they are caught blatantly lying and violating the law, and definitely does NOT know the laws or follow the law. Complain to Presiding Court Judge David Danielson about him.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11061
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Folks - this is the rudest, most biased judge you will ever experience! Makes sport of being rude - demeaning - embarrassing, and trying his level best to irritate the litigants and/or their attorneys in his courtroom. I guess it's because the "your honor" thing is required. Sick, sick' sick - depraved truly! 170.6 period here!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA10646
Rating:1.1
Comments:
Awful, Awful, and awful. And yes, he is 100 percent biased against woman.

Other

Comment #: CA10645
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Pollack, is the most Biased, unfair judge there is. He ruled against my mom and brother in a restraining order. Even though he knew her and should of recused himself in the first place. This judge is rude, unfair, and is a monster. He should be removed from bench for unethical practices. He will be sued. He is biased against women, etc and is unfair. He should of never been elected a judge. He is the worst judge in Sd, CA.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA10561
Rating:1.7
Comments:
Abuse of Discretion under color of law, failure to recuse, bias with malice and forethought... All fact based and as plain as day.

Other

Comment #: CA10057
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This Judge shows favoritism towards certain attorneys and expert witnesses, makes bad rulings, ignores court protocol, allows witnesses to lie, and dislikes women. He was moved out of Vista Court an hour drive away to Downtown San Diego Court after he was caught holding on to family law court cases after being sent to criminal court cases. He was overturned by the appeals court for misconduct on cases, and has been a big contributor to abusive fathers with money getting custody of children under the false allegations of "Parental Alienation" by the mothers; usually after the father had abused / molested the children and the mother filed a report.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA10055
Rating:4.6
Comments:
Reversed himself during trial on several motions in limine that he had previously granted with no real explanation as to why. Watching him rule on a motion or objection is like watching him play a ping-pong match with himself. Bad rulings and poor trial management resulted in him granting a motion for new trial after a jury verdict went bad for plaintiff.

Other

Comment #: CA5130
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Pollack is incompetent and bias.