Hon. Peter K. Ottenweller See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Sonoma County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Peter K. Ottenweller


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA45059
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA45058 -TRR ED's leave up this angry ALL CAPS posts, but take down post by victim of LASC family law courtrooms, at demand of guilty, creepy, nepotism nasty attorney troll, who demand's deletion of posts and/or certain judges' names, of those in, quid pro quo, inner circle ? Why do the words, "receipts', "nepotism", make them so nervous, aren't they "protected" and can hurt, threaten, abuse, and "do whatever they want". per the very words of LA family court, creepy nepotism attorney troll?

Other

Comment #: CA45058
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
CARES MORE ABOURT FATHERS PARENTAL RIGHTS MORE THAN PARENTAL RIGHTS AND CHILDRENS RIGHTS. IGNORES THE LAWS, ABUSE OF POWER, MAKES HIS OWN RULES, APPOINTS COUNCILOR THERAPISTS THAT WILL DO WHAT HE PLEASES, COURTROOM ETIQUETTE NO EXSIISTENT, IGNORES MATERIALS FACTS, PAPERS, [Redacted by Ed.] HE TAKES CHILDREN AWAY FROM MOTHERS WHO HAVE HAD THE CHILDREN THEIR WHOLE LIVES AND GIVES CHILDREN TO FATHERS WHO HAVE CONTINUAL PATTERN OF SEVER DOMESTIC VIOLNCE, MULTI CONVICTED FELONS. OTTENWELLER, HIS COURTROOM STAFF, APPOINTED KID COUNCIL AND THERAPISTS ARE [redacted] SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED.

Other

Comment #: CA40226
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Biased towards unrepresented parties by letting them speak over the other parties and attorneys.

Sees parents rights as priority over childrens rights to safety, predictability, continuity and peace. Allowed unsupervised visitation, even when a parent has open domestic violence records.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA22567
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Biased
Sees himself as an all powerful dictator