Hon. Sarah H. Heckman See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Sutter County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.8 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 5 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Sarah H. Heckman


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA10471
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Sarah Heckman is NOT honorable nor Worthy. I have unfortunately have come into some form of contact with this judge twice weither it be with myself or a friend. In my experience she was uncourteous and in my opinion bias to white males in the court room. The dirty looks I received made me uncomfortable in very small. As though I had done something wrong in bringing someone to court for justice in a family matter. She is not a good person and is not what we need.

Other

Comment #: CA10470
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This woman has absolutely no business wearing the robe or being in a courtroom! She's incredibly rude and hateful. She discriminates and contradicts herself. The most unprofessional judge I've ever come into contact with. I don't understand how such a person became a judge. How can you look at a person going through whatever it may be while in your court room with such discussed in judgment without even hearing them out first. I was felt betrayed by my judicial system when I was put in front of this judge. This person is supposed to represent our County and she is one of the most ugly person I've ever been around. Her manner on the bench is of a careless soul. She wouldn't even let me finish my sentence let alone give her my evidence and proof of incidents Brought at hand. I had police reports, surveillance pictures, physical evidence none of which she let me present. The danger of my family and myself was imminent. After being fed up with the whole case because it wasn't going in the direction she wanted ( which was in my favor) she stormed out of the court room like a small child to her chamber slamming the door ultimately not finding in my favorite though I had everything needed and had provided. The uncertainty of my families safety was sealed because of this woman. And she made that decision so easily without the blink of an eye or a care in the world. And as a matter of factly seemed annoyed that I had even asked her for such a thing as fairness. I hope and pray everyday that this woman is taken off the bench!

Other

Comment #: CA9827
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This "judge" disregarded the FACTS, expert testimony, eye witnesses and honest testimony in reaching her decision. Instead she sided with the individual whom was repeatedly caught being dishonest and deceptive to the court. What has happened to the "justice system" in this country when a judge is allowed to base her judgment on personal feelings and disregards facts and overwhelming evidence?

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA8921
Rating:2.5
Comments:
Extremely unprofessional and discourteous to parties and counsel and very disrespectful. Judges before hearing all parties and shows extreme bias. Has a very bad temptement and should definitely not be a judge.

Other

Comment #: CA8614
Rating:1.0
Comments:
S.Heckman made several malapropos comment about counsel when they are out of court in front of opposing counsel. She was not prepared and grossly unorganized. Does not listen. Flagrant bias

Other

Comment #: CA8377
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is biased, disrespectful, ignorant and makes decisions based on her personal opinions rather than the basis of the facts and the law. She has her own personal agenda. She drug out for almost three years what should have been resolved in less than one day! She demonstrated 5th grade antics and is unprofessional! She drug out what another judge said should have been thrown out the first day for three years! How she is allowed to remain a judge is a mystery!!

Other

Comment #: CA8140
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge has got to be the worst judge I have ever encountered. She rewards a bad parent by giving the good parent the same treatment to be "fair". I'm not sure if she's scared or too lazy to make decisions. I wish there was a way to get this case out of her courtroom. How she manages to stay a judge is beyond me.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA6303
Rating:1.3
Comments:
"No Perry Mason moments in this court". She needs to listen more instead of always trying to be heard. Read the briefs and just make a decision. I was in her court every month for a custody dispute for over 1 year. Spend $85k on attorney fees n custody evaluations n she wouldn't ever make a decision (she doesn't like trials because it forces her to make a decision). She needs to focus on the facts of the case, not her personal bias opinion. If your in her court, request another judge... I was eventually able to transfer the case to Butte county (wasn't easy), judge [Mcnellis] read the briefs and made a decision first appearance. He couldn't believe this sat in her court for 1 year and 17 appearances.

Other

Comment #: CA5068
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Not a good judge. She is un able to make clear decision. She dose not even finish the ruling. Leaving things out wants parents they do what to do child sup. She trays and makes them. I have set through her court room many times. Let's the women get away with everything. Will no hold the accountable for nothing. One mom got away with working 12 hours a week and making that dad pay her alimony when she didn't even ask for it. And won't let the dad be with his kids. Cause mom made up lies. judge even count her in the lie. She is ruining lives. Yelled at a lady in the crowd for shaking her hair on disbelief she should not have the right to make decisions.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA4763
Rating:1.6
Comments:
This judge never starts on time. She cannot handle a calendar on her own. She has to have the bailiff pull files for her. It is apparent that she either takes the bench without reading the files, or that she does not take notes, or is unable to remember the facts of the case that is in front of her. She is unprepared and seems overwhelmed. She also appears to be biased and unable to make a decision. She is always referring people back to mediation to see if they can "resolve" their family law case.