Hon. David C. Mathias See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Tulare County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.1 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. David C. Mathias


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA14963
Rating:2.1
Comments:
Absolutely terrible. Literally mocking witnesses and the parties. Made it clear before hearing any evidence he has made up his mind.

Also, be sure to mediate because if you decline, he will make a fool of you in court for enforcing your rights because it infringes on his time.

Seems like he doesn’t care for safety of parties either. If you ever have a case in front of him, consider a .6. Terrible.

Other

Comment #: CA4314
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Replaced Judge Shirk after two years of testimony, then handed down a decision that was full of errors, both in law and in basic math. Also neglected to read the complete file and missed volumes of info. When I filed a motion for reconsideration, he assigned me a court date that was past the 30 days, then stated, correctly, that he had no jurisdiction. Then he told me he would give me an additional 30 days to prove that he should hear my motion before making a judgement. In doing so, because of my ignorance, he caused me to miss the additional 30-day deadline to file an appeal. He handed down a decision full of errors, then manipulated the system so that I couldn't appeal.