Hon. Roger L. Lund See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Ventura County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.7 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 5 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Roger L. Lund


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA18711
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Do not bother to enter this court if you are a woman. He hates woman and he will side with the man no matter what the case. He is a Mormon women do not matter.

Other

Comment #: CA14842
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I have been in Judge Lunds court 4 times and every time he was cruel and harsh and sided with my ex even though I brought evidence of court orders being broken by my ex and his girlfriend with drinking and driving and five years of evidence of domestic violence. 5 DUIs a piece on their record and one since my daughter's been there. He didn't care that my ex broke the strict no drinking order or that my daughter was witnessing domestic violence and was mauled by their vicious family dog in the face . Why and how is he a judge? He has no conscience and I was warned by other women before entering the courtroom. This is a travesty of Justice and my daughter is in immenint danger.

Other

Comment #: CA13536
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Horrible judge, this man needs to be removed from court. He is a complete disgrace to any judicial process. This man threw documented perjury out of court, even coerced my ex into saying "This must have been a misunderstanding am I correct?" No, it was completely false allegations that he allowed and acted on in court. He detests woman and should not be allowed in family court or any court for that matter.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA13533
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I was warned before entering Lund's court how I should appear. My first attorney told me what to wear, no make up, no heels, high collar shirts. I even had two other attorneys refuse my case unless I was able to get another judge. This man hates woman he will go in favor of the man even if he has a criminal history. I was shocked how bias he was, completely unfair down right cruel at times.

Litigant

Comment #: CA13532
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Lund is extraordinarily prejudiced against women. He will take a perjured statement from a man, over hard, documented evidence from a woman.

He lacks the ability to comprehend case law, and routinely fails to follow judicial guidelines.

This man should be removed. He should never be allowed near a courtroom again.

Other

Comment #: CA12263
Rating:2.0
Comments:
One of the rudest family judges I have seen. Predisposed to the husband in divorce settlement. Curt and threatening. Seemed to dislike lawyer and took it out on litigant. No regard for wife's situation. Pro male without looking at specific details. Not Ventura County quality. Lawyers feel he's angry to be reassigned in this position and not in criminal court anymore.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA9666
Rating:2.6
Comments:
Horrible judge. One of the worst family law judges I've ever dealt with in Ventura. Patently sexist, very biased against women. God complex. Apparently quite popular with his judicial peers, but to litigants and attorneys, simply awful, awful, awful. Local appellate court has overturned family court rulings, and rightly so. Routinely papered, and thankfully left the family law department a while back. Should be voted off the bench.

Other

Comment #: CA8232
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He has no business being in the courtroom. I would confidently venture as far as to say he lacks the mental capacity, or integrity, to oversee anything - especially children in the most minute of details.
When attorneys are secretly flipping him off in his courtroom, you see what kind of respect he garners.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA5473
Rating:1.4
Comments:
This judge needs a refresher course in procedure. He also needs to learn how to proof read his writing. I don't believe he makes orders on law and procedure, but rather on that days emotion. He needs to learn about Tax Law, simple Income Tax Law.

Other

Comment #: CA5472
Rating:1.0
Comments:
No judge can remember everything about a case before him. This judge makes orders, and then forgets and apparently doesn't take the time to look over his previous minutes/orders. He appointed a Public Guardian in a case, meaning the disabled person is no longer the "Respondent" then for about 18 months forgot to have the Guardian there to represent the disabled person. This is procedurally wrong. He also, states orders that make no sense. I only wish there was an official that would make him look at his mistakes of procedure.