Hon. Pamela M. Parker See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Diego County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 52 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Pamela M. Parker


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA30881
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Atrocious personality. She is extremely destructive to children. Continuously favors the mother/wives in non-malignant divorces. However, she also disproportionally favors the mother/wives that have clear sociopathic personality traits or personality. Either she has a blind bias towards females or she is consciously malignant and enjoys hurting the men and the children. She enjoys seeing men squirm and be in pain on the stand in her court. I have actually seen her smile and get excited when men express painful emotions. It seems she gets mentally rewarded and gets her high from hurting the men. It's disgusting, sadistic and truly heinous. Unfortunately, she is legally immune as a judge. However, there is a way to remove her from the bunch. It takes about 300k to remove a judge from the bench by financing another candidate to run against her at the 6 year election mark. There have been hundreds of men who have been tortured and hurt by this immoral woman. If each of them contribute 1 to 2 thousand dollars each, she can be removed from the bench and forever retired to her personal misery and loneliness due to her selfish and destructive character. The men should come together as a unit and forcefully retire her.

Other

Comment #: CA30565
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Nice try Missy. Better luck next time Pam.

Other

Comment #: CA30550
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Dear angry men

Let me shed light in how far this rabbit hole goes. Parker and multiple other female family court judges are members of the “lawyers club of San Diego” which is an organization that promotes the advancement of women in the legal field. The official slogan is “advancement of women in the legal field”. The slogan does NOT say to promote equality in the legal field, rather emphasizes advancement of women in the legal field than emphasizing equality. So, we clearly know that these judges are pro female and anti male.

But the truly heinous part of this set up is that the lawyers club of San Diego is heavily financed and sponsored by the most greedy family law firms in San Diego. Are you following this? Connecting the dots? The family law firms that destroy men financially are sponsoring the club that is pro female. Surprised yet? But there is more.

Given that these judges are elected every 6 years by non-restrictive public financing, meaning it can even be the man destroying family lawyers in their courts who donate to their election campaign, then the system is rigged against men. The system is designed for men to lose. Are you guys still following me?

There is a huge backlash coming and the authorities are starting to take notice. The feds are observing the LA county family court. Also, very soon the RICO case against San Diego family court system might come back to life and this time it will succeed.

Marriage is racket and the laws in the system are heavily stacked against men. If you want to get married legally, you must have your family outside United States.

If you want to have children in the United States, it’s ok to have relationships and have children. But never legally marry women and never live under the same roof and never pay for the woman’s lifestyle. If they want true equality, they can go get a job and their own maintenance. Split custody from the beginning 50/50.

If true feminist laws are enacted, then the laws will force women to be garbage collectors and sewer treatment plant cleaners just like men. Those jobs will be split 50/50 by force of law as well. But you don’t see the feminists fighting for those jobs, do you? You don’t see females fighting over jobs in a coal mine digging a hole to the center of the earth while risking being buried under a mountain of rocks.

As the previous reviewer said, once you mention legally forcing females to take 50% of those jobs, then Parker along with all those hardcore man hating female judges will remain perfectly silent.

Whoever is maintaining this site, if you have any dignity and humanity, you will leave this comment be and not remove it. I doubt you do, but prove me wrong.

So judge Parker, I want to see you put your money where your mouth is. I want you to start lobbying with the full fury of your anger to legally force women to take 50% of the garbage collector jobs and coal miner digger jobs. And while you are at it, maybe you should fight ferociously so make exotic dancers and make adult entertainers get the same pay as females.

Other

Comment #: CA30542
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is eerily similar to Cathy Newman who is a British journalist and reporter. The fathers and husbands have no chance in her court. There is No way she would have been appointed as judge if her true man hating nature was discovered earlier.

Other

Comment #: CA30119
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
In Pamela Parkers court, the wives and mothers are entitled to get the authority that men have had throughout the ages, the privileges of what women have always had though out the ages, and the irresponsibility and lack of accountability that children have had throughout the ages.

Parker is an embarrassment to true feminists. Simply put, she is just a bad person.

Other

Comment #: CA29957
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I am guessing her life didn't turn out as she expected/wanted. When she was young, I'm sure everybody around told her she was the smartest, sharpest and strongest. And that she cant possibly do anything wrong. She was the princess who was expected to grow up to be a queen. However, that was just her parents and friends telling her that. In reality, she is of average intelligence with a nasty attitude. Which makes her overall worth far less than average.

Bitter, petty, an embarrassment and a failure.

Other

Comment #: CA29794
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Quack -psycho "psychiatrist"--all conjecture and this is not a normal comment, of a "psychiatrist." As they say, many psychiatrists are more F'd up than the patients--this comment proved the theory..

It is completely irresponsible, for a male- "grandfather" psychiatrist", to diagnose a person, they have never treated and well as a creepy male, discussing a
female judge is "depressed"

In my Opinion,this is slandar and defamation. The origin of the comment , CA29792 should be subpoenaed.

Other

Comment #: CA29792
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I am the grandfather of one of the her male victims. I am also a psychiatrist. Nothing new to see here. She is just another one of the profoundly immoral family law judges in California. She is legally untouchable because she had legal immunity. But she is not immune to natural law. Natural law supersedes all other laws. She is already profoundly miserable due to her conscious choice of being a bad person. However, she has no common sense and thus doesn't realize why she is a miserable wretch. This is only the beginning. Once psychological unhappiness from personality issues settles in, if you follow their health status, then physical and social ills start in such people. Women like this usually develop fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome in addition to severe depression and unpredictable fits of rage. I hope she lives a very very very long time on earth because the physical, psychological and social karma she is accruing will be all handed to her by nature.

Other

Comment #: CA29751
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Easily outsmarted. She is every intelligent criminals dream come true.

Other

Comment #: CA29480
Rating:1.0
Comments:
To all the Gentlemen:

-if you want to win, then flattery is the key to controlling Judge parker insecure ego
- if you want to lose, then trigger the covert furious feminist


To all the ladies:
- if you want to win, just nod and smile
- if you want to lose, tell Parker that you like to be dominated and told what to do by a big strong alpha male, also tell her that you are just a girl and that you just wanna go out to the yard and play jump rope

Judge Parker is a just a big joke

Other

Comment #: CA29428
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Sadistic social bully hiding behind a black robe. Unfair.

Other

Comment #: CA29351
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Parker should know if you choose to adopt the feminist philosophy and you end up a bitter angry woman, she should not take out her rage of women who choose the traditional feminine roles and men who choose traditional masculine rolls. Those are her ideals and her ideals only. They do not belong in her court room, they belong only in her personal. If she can’t come to terms with her bitterness and angry feminist, she should retire and go be bitter at home where no one can be a victim of her bitter anger. She should stop projecting her bitter anger on masculine men and feminine women. She has wasted her life, she wants to ruin other people’s lives, families and children. Truly evil and disgusting.

She has no business being in the bench. It’s pathetic and sad.

Other

Comment #: CA29347
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Unjust, unethical and immoral

Litigant

Comment #: CA29253
Rating:1.0
Comments:
delusion is defined as the following in the dictionary:


A delusion is a firm and fixed belief based on inadequate grounds not amenable to rational argument or evidence to contrary, not in sync with regional, cultural and educational background. As a pathology, it is distinct from a belief based on false or incomplete information, confabulation, dogma, illusion, or some other misleading effects of perception.

Now you tell me, is Parker delusional? The answer is an emphatic YES

Litigant

Comment #: CA29186
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Not a judge. She is a misplaced spectator. Her life was stolen from her early in childhood. It’s sad and unfortunate. Maybe retirement will bring her peace.

Litigant

Comment #: CA29129
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Instead of pursuing justice and preventing crime, this judge loves to create brand new criminals by giving to custody of children to the abusive criminal spouse. The words "menace to society" are absolutely perfect in describing her judicial career.

Litigant

Comment #: CA29119
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I feel sorry for Pamela Parker. She will NEVER EVER be as good as a judge as her father was. It must be soul crushing to be a feminist warrior but never be able to get out of the paternal shadow. Honestly, I think this is why she is so angry. Deep inside, she knows she is a loser as compared to her dad.

I guarantee you that when she lays down her head on the pillow at night to go to sleep, the anger starts to boil to the surface and causes her further insomnia. People like her with this kind of psychiatric baggage do not get good night sleep. You want proof? Look at her when she comes to the bench at 8:30 am. She is suffering from insomnia and is bitter and irritable.

She is a lost cause at this point in her life. To all the young women that are career minded and are trying hard to succeed at their jobs, take a look at her. Make sure you don’t end up like her by being pathologically envious of men, miserable, full of poison, and full of hate.

Litigant

Comment #: CA29108
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
What I’m about to tell you is extremely important. This judge is incapable of determining who the cluster B narcissist, sociopath or psychopath is amongst the divorcing party. She is very easily duped by the cluster B party at the very beginning of the trial and will continue hurting you with negative ruling after ruling while under the spell and charm of the cluster B party. The psychos in her courtroom have figured out that she is very susceptible to flattery and can turn her into advocate on their behalf. If your soon to be ex-wife or ex-husband has cluster B personality, either ask for a representative of judicial coalition performance or an auditor to be present in the court anonymously or make sure you transcribe every court session and record all documents. Take those documents and give them to a court auditor or coalition for judicial performance. This woman should have never been a judge. At the current moment, people in her court room are noticing this, but her demeanor and ruling MUST be reported to the coalition for judicial performance in order to stop this insecure low intelligent judge who has massive inferiority complex with respect to male judges. If all divorcing parties report her over and over again, she will finally be removed. She is the most incompetent judge in the San Diego court system and her appointment was solely a political one, not one based in talent or merit. She must be disabled legally on a permanent basis.

Litigant

Comment #: CA29073
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Unpleasant, bitter and mean. She gets off on hurting and torturing men. When you walk into her courtroom, you can actually feel her toxic energy and the mean spirit. Her behavior is not solely relegated to her professional performance, It is part of her deep seeded personality. She is just a toxic miserable person. Without exception, people with this type of personality end up miserable and lonely as they age. They might or might not have a good job and social status, but their own families and friends start marginalizing them and cutting them off. I do not feel bad about her at all, because she is doing the same thing to other families in her court. She knows what she is doing is wrong, but she does it anyway because it “feels” good. When the karma bus hits them, then they understand it deeply rather than just knowing it as before. But by then, it’s too late, they will have to suffer the consequences of their actions.

Litigant

Comment #: CA28821
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Gentlemen:

You might not realize it from the way it looks. But even though Judge Parker is wearing a black robe and sitting 3 feet above everyone, she is actually not the judge on the case. After a while, it becomes fairly obvious that she is the opposing lawyer for your soon to be ex-wife. Judge Parker will interpret and manipulate the law any which way possible to hurt you and award the soon to be ex-wife and/or mother. Judge parker has been indoctrinated to hate anything that has testosterone.

She is nasty and spiteful misandrist.

Litigant

Comment #: CA28745
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She tries so hard to hide the fact that she hates men but everyone in the courtroom clearly sees it. No one has the guts to call her out on it openly in court. Her behavior is now hardwired into her brain at the age of 60. The implications are as follows:

Now that she is supervising criminal cases, it means she is going to convict innocent men and set free criminal women. And do you do know what will result in? her rulings on men will get reversed on appeals And the criminal females who have been set free will become emboldened and commit bigger crimes. Once these females go in front of another judge, their previous legal files will be reviewed and other judges will see that Parker is clearly bias and incompetent.

Her promotion has just accelerated her demise. She and her incompetence have become more visible in the legal community.

Litigant

Comment #: CA28744
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
she suffers from two characteristics that is a recipe for disaster. She is both Ignorant and conceited. The combination of these two traits leads make her delusional. She lives in her mind, not in reality.

Litigant

Comment #: CA28635
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Are you kidding me? Is this clueless woman now an assistant supervising judge in criminal cases?

This woman can’t determine who the criminal is if you showed her a picture of Ted Bundy stabbing someone in addition to a written and oral confession of Ted Bundy standing in front of her. She has virtually zero knowledge iof cluster B personality disorder and criminal psychopathology.

The criminals in her court have the best chance of getting of the hook out of any other judges court in San Diego. If you are a female criminal, then you have twice as good of a chance as getting off scott-free in front of her. Parker seems to have a deep seeded belief that women can’t possibly be criminals. You don’t believe me? Go review her cases in central courthouse. It will be crystal clear to you.

Who came up with the brilliant idea to appoint her to criminal court?

I remember representing clients in front of her. And everytime the bailiffs would walk out of hersession, they would hang their heads low and shake them in disgust.

Other

Comment #: CA28633
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She has taken her misandrous behavior and rulings to an obscenely never before seen savage levels. To all the males in her court, no matter what you do or say, no matter how blatantly innocent you are, it will be of no value in protecting you against this judges sadistic and deliberately cruel nature. She is a bad judge and a worse human being.

You must automatically recuse her “without cause” 10 days before your first hearing. You can do it without a lawyer. It’s a very easily legal maneuver.

I’m disgusted that such a person is allowed to be a judge.

Other

Comment #: CA28533
Rating:1.0
Comments:
she looks miserable and beat up, it seems like she is not happy with her own life and is taking it out on anyone and everyone in the court room

being a miserable angry lawyer is oftentimes acceptable and the legal system has a place for those kinds of lawyers, but being a judge with those qualities is not acceptable and not conducive to appropriate justice

I believe she is a housewife misplaced to be a judge, something went wrong in her childhood, maybe being was neglected and/o was spoiled

I don't think anyone will remove her from the bench, but it doesn't matter, bringing that kind of personality to the bench is self sabotaging and self destructive to her own professional and personal life

the ire of the people at the end of her injustice is really not needed, her conduct is far more destructive to herself than the objections of the victims in her court

Other

Comment #: CA28425
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Sorry excuse for a judge. She is terrible

Litigant

Comment #: CA28143
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
After representing several men in front of this judge and how this man destroyer savagely tore apart my completely innocent clients and destroyed their lives because of her toxic feminist ideology, for the first time in my life, I am voting for a Republican governor and a republican president, even if it's Trump. The pendulum against men has gone too far and now innocent men are being hurt. I am ashamed I voted for Governor Brown who appointed this toxic judge. The METOO movement has backfired.

The world owes an apology to Johnny Depp. Amber Heard should be behind bars.

Other

Comment #: CA28114
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Lacking the aptitude and the knowledge to accurately identify the criminal abuser vs the victim of domestic abuse. It makes this judge extremely dangerous. Lacks basic fund of knowledge in psychology needed to qualify as a family court judicial officer. Not fit to preside over cases involving a cluster B party petitioner or respondent. Unfit to preside over emotionally charged family cases due to her own ill and angry temperament. It is unwise to have such individual preside over criminal or family cases. I find it absurd how someone like her can become a judge without a fundamental political flaw in the selection process. If she had any conscious, she would step down from the bench. It is imperative that she is removed from the bench.

Other

Comment #: CA28004
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Who is the commentator that is upset at the negative reviews? Is that you Judge Parker? Could it be Pamela Parker? Why so sensitive now?

Did you really think that you can forever hide your man hating ideology? Did you really think you can continue hurting men and not face the consequences of your actions? Are you so clueless to think you, eventhough legally immune, are also publicly immune to the results of your actions? Unfortunately, it’s too late to correct your behavior and avoid the fallout from your ill tempered rulings ? It is obvious there is finally backlash to you professionally and personally.

I have noticed that the lawyers in your judicial court are recusing you with greater frequency. It won’t be long until you are forced to quit.

It’s called “reaping what you sow”, which coincidentally , is a sentence from a book you mock and ridicule publicly while sitting on the bench.

Litigant

Comment #: CA27958
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I cant believe how incompetent and foolish this judge is. She took my ex-wife's side despite significant amount of evidence of fraud, deception and criminal behavior. She continued chastising me and rewarding her. In turn, my ex-wife became emboldened and arrogant and thought she was untouchable. She continued her criminal activity until she was caught by other legal and state authorities. if this pro-female low IQ judge hadn't emboldened her, maybe my ex-wife wouldn't have destroyed herself. However, now I have full custody because my ex-wife got nailed. Thus, I have to say to Judge Parker:

"thank you""

Court Staff

Comment #: CA26225
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is nearly 60 years old and has no idea what she is doing. If she does know what she is doing, then she has no morals or ethics, which is far worse than just being ignorant. Either she does know what she is doing and she is intentionally destroying families out of evil intent. Or she is a complete ignorant tool who is destroying families and does not realize it due to some liberal nonsense she has indoctrinated in the past. I agree with the reviewer that she is a little bit of both. She is a toxic family hating fool who not only destroys men, she also destroys children. If you pay attention to the divorce outcomes that she presided over and what happened to the man, woman and children of those divorces, they are doing far worse than the compared to the other divorces that other judges preside over. I don't care that she was a Harvard graduate. She is an absolutely atrocious, destructive and damaging judge, specifically to children. She routinely gives custody of the children to the unfit parent. She lives in her own ideological feminist mind, social justice warrior mentality, however, the truth and the outcome of her decisions are far more devastating. It reminds me of communists who witnesses the destruction of soviet union, but are still communists, they are delusional and live in a fantasy land.
She is seeing the result of the ruling and how it is devastating the mother, father and children, yet she is still doing it. That is the definition of being delusional

Other

Comment #: CA25817
Rating:1.0
Comments:
she is not pro-female, she is anti-male

she enjoys hurting and destroying men, she does not have any agenda of empowering women, her primary agenda is to tear men down,

she is a tool, she just doesn't know it, and probably never will

Litigant

Comment #: CA25018
Rating:1.0
Comments:
sorry excuse for a judge,

needs to quit being a judge and get some mental health counseling for herself, she should stop projecting her own anger problems, bitterness and loathing on the respondent and the petitioner, she need some anger management classes herself and maybe a psychological evaluation for suspected personality disorder

she has created a lot of enemies in the legal field and it will sooner for later bite her on the "you know what", she is low IQ pompous ignorant fool

need to get off the bench, she is just terrible

Other

Comment #: CA24770
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Parker was recently assigned to an assistant supervising judge in North County. Her position basically involves supervising a mix of Family cases and Criminal cases.

I am truly baffled how a judge who is clearly a raging man hating pseudo-feminist can be assigned to supervise Family Court cases AND shocked how a judge who has no knowledge of Cluster B personality disorders and has zero aptitude in figuring out who the narcissist or the sociopath can be assigned to a supervise criminal court cases.

Can someone explain that to me?

Other

Comment #: CA24651
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Vicious man hater.

Litigant

Comment #: CA24357
Rating:1.0
Comments:
what a great answer below, i have no doubt it was from a woman

with that logic, I suggest we remove all judges from the bench and replace them with statisticians

parker does not follow evidence or law....parker follows an ideology that only exists in her own mind, not in the real world

Parker is a well known staunch feminist in the san Diego legal community and in the family court system.

Go around the central court house, no judge wants to emulate her, Parker is the butt of jokes in the judicial circles, I have no doubt that she was a phenomenal environmental lawyer, but she is a terrible family judge and she will be removed in disgrace sooner or later, I am willing to bet on it, there is a lot of chatter in the legal community of san diego regarding her demeanor and her rulings, the lawyers of husbands and fathers are realizing who she is and they are filing automatic motion for recusal without cause before even going in front of her, Parker has been exposed for who she is, she cant hide it anymore....the cat is out of the bag

Other

Comment #: CA24150
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Parkers hatred of men has made her into a blind fool. I wonder how many criminal mothers have been awarded sole custody by this raging incompetent miserable pseudo-feminist fool. Not only should she be recused from every family court case, she must be removed from the bench indefinitely due to lack of proper judicial temperament.

Litigant

Comment #: CA23553
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The book on Judge Parker is very simple. If you are a man and your attorney does not issue a peremptory challenge against Judge Parker (CCP 170.6), sue that attorney for malpractice.

Other

Comment #: CA23454
Rating:1.0
Comments:
dear lord, this is horrific. I just read these reviews for the first time.

I'm a male victim of this judge. I have been the CEO of several successful companies. So I would say I am fairly capable and intelligent. During the trial, I kept asking myself "what the heck is going on?".I was starting to think I might be the problem. I kept re-evaluating myself and analyzing everything that had happened between me and my ex-wife. And this judge's rulings were not making sense at all. At first I thought it was the laws that are heavily stacked against me and men in general. But the more I evaluate it and rationalize it, it's not the laws that are the problem. It's this judge in particular that is the problem.

reading these reviews are making it very clear. I am now very upset. I dont know what to do about this, it's been over 2 years since my case has been completed with severe damage to my parenthood and my reputation. Does anyone know how to help me?

Other

Comment #: CA23425
Rating:1.0
Comments:
slowly, but surely, Parker is being exposed for who she really is....an angry man hating bully with pathological envy of mens strength and intelligence

happy retirement

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA23336
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Very happy to have her for female clients. Recuse her as a matter of course for male clients.

Litigant

Comment #: CA21937
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Miserable radical pro-female judge with a fragile ego and deep seeded inferiority complex with relation to male counterparts. Has mediocre intelligence and less than average skill as a judge.

To all the males who are going through divorce in front of her, if you are at least 10 days or more before having your first hearing in front of her, you can file for an "automatic recusal without cause" to remove her from your case. If this is done over and over again and consistently with all male petitioners/respondents, it will create a putrid reputation for her and the higher ups in the state will take notice of it. She will either quit or be removed. To the fathers and the husbands, all of you have to consistently recuse her 10 days before your first hearing. It's very easy to do and you do not need to show cause. It's a legal maneuver that is easy to do. Her man-hating days on the bench are numbered.

Litigant

Comment #: CA21311
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Awful judge. I sat through a morning session where she made three straight "findings" that ex parte notice had been made by woman - with no man present. A month later, a get an "emergency" order from an ex parte where I wasn't given notice.

There is no judge in San Diego County with more than 20 ratings on here (mid 2019) that have nearly as low a rating. This person should not be a judge. Numerous complaints to the coalition of judicial performance are in order for her.

Litigant

Comment #: CA21309
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Been before around 30 judges. This one the worse by a large, large margin. This harms children. She prevented me from placing my son - who had been through so much family court litigation he had become a drug addict, a twice expelled student, and a convicted felon by age 15. Judge Parker saw fit to award custody to his mother. She did so by telephone with the juvenile court judge without ever hearing from the litigants. The boy then proceeded to reoffend. She not only harmed him, creating for sure a lifelong criminal, she harms all of those in society. This individual should not be a judge. Her bitterness, obvious self esteem issues, and marginal intelligence are irretrivable.

Litigant

Comment #: CA20685
Rating:1.0
Comments:
What bizzaro world does this woman preside over? I feel like I'm in an episode of the twilight zone when I'm in front of her. I kept showing her HARD EVIDENCE from DEPOSITIONS DONE on parties involved WHERE THEY ADMITTED to their deeds and crimes. I kept showing Parker BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT evidence that my ex-wife is trying to undermine my career through deception and fraud and consistantly disregarding court orders. . But continued to call me "not credible"..."illogical"..."irrational" and kept saying "this doesn't make sense, why would your ex wife want your career destroyed since she want s child support?".....Maybe, JUST MAYBE, it's because JUDGE PARKER DOESN"T KNOW JACK SQUAT ABOUT CLUSTER B's......I am seriously thinking that parker is delusional to the realities of the facts that are put in front of her. A family court judge who is completely clueless in Cluster B personality disorders DOES NOT BELONG IN ANY FAMILY OR CRIMINAL COURT.....she should go back to environmental law....or better yet just retire

Litigant

Comment #: CA19894
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Rabidly anti-Male and rancidly incompetent. There is no doubt in my mind that she is a staunch miserable feminist and trying to make men miserable. Unfortunately the universe doesnt work that way, she is just making herself more angry, bitter and miserable by being willfully malignant. She doesnt realize that her happiness resides in quitting her job as a judge and focusing on introspection. It's sad to see how she has become exponentially miserable on the bench over the past 4 years. I have witnessed it and actually see the changes for the worst in her in the past few years. I dont feel sorry for her, she is doing in to herself by her man hating agenda. Karma

Litigant

Comment #: CA19718
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Very weak judge. She is easily fooled by crafty wives/mothers more so than lying fathers/husband From my observation, she does not have a feminine bias. I believe she focuses on men because deep down inside she knows the men are the ones that will challenge her authority in court more so than the women. That may very well be true, but many of the women who challenge her authority in court are unchecked because her focus is on the men. If the couple divorcing are somewhat intelligent and educated, they can easily manipulate her and play her. I am referring to both the petitioner and the respondent. She doesnt realize that she is dancing like a puppet without strings being manipulated by the parties getting divorced. Despite her prestigious degree, I don't believe it reflects her intelligence because I dont believe she has the raw intellect to realize that she is being manipulated. What's sad is that I dont believe she will ever see it or realize it. I wholeheartedly believe that she should be removed from the bench. She is just too incompetent.

Other

Comment #: CA19574
Rating:1.0
Comments:
its is clear that this Judge abhors men. She has raging anger towards men underneath the civil facade and the smily mask. However, she is also intolerant of lazy wives/mothers. She usually crucifies men, but at the same time also tells the wives/mothers to go get a job. Since she takes pleasure in destroying me, she has no option to tell the women to go get jobs. Otherwise she would have to answer to someone higher up such as the California Judiciary review board. By ordering the women to go get jobs, she is really just covering her own behind.

Litigant

Comment #: CA19486
Rating:1.0
Comments:
foolish and clueless

Other

Comment #: CA19261
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The overarching and the fundamental problem with Parker is her inability to let her ego and her reputation to take an shameful insult. This woman is not stupid at all. However, due to her female bias, she is easily fooled at the beginning of a case. Further down the line in the case, when there is not a just a couple of pieces of evidence, but a truck load of beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence showing the wives/mothers are being conniving manipulative criminals, then Parker, WHILE KNOWING VERY WELL THAT SHE HAS BEEN WRONG ALL ALONG, will not reverse her own decision unless it's ridiculously obvious to the common person because it will be a shameful insult to her ego for being an incompetent fool and will make her a source of mockery by the other judges and other court staff noticing that she just cant judge correctly and accurately. I read the comments saying "how did she become a judge?"...it's very simple, she is not a judge at all, she was never a judge and she can never be a judge, she just acts like one on the bench

If she had any humility, she would admit she is wrong and not fit for the job and resign from her job instead of continuously misjudging and ruinning families in hopes of one day she might "get the hang of" or "LEARN" to be a judge. Unfortunately, she just doesn't have what it takes to be a judge. Parker's father was a SUPER STAR judge. He was a magnificent judge. It seems like the "judge genes" were all on the Y chromosome and Pamela didn't receive that natural gift that her father had and had polished throughout his career.. Maybe that's why she hates everything that carries a Y chromosome because she is envious of men.

Litigant

Comment #: CA18979
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Absolutely Awful. I didn't realize they let fools graduate from Harvard. Parker rules based on ideology, not facts or laws. If you show her a ton of facts and evidence, if it doesn't merge with her ideology, she will use every "rules of evidence" nonsense to throw out the evidence. If you are able to submit the evidence, she attaches some nonsense to it as "not for the truth of the matter". She will admit evidence even if it's hearsay only if it aligns with her ideology. Anything that does not align with her pro-female, anti-male ideology will be resisted the utmost degree. Furthermore, even if you are able to sumbit HARDCORE EVIDENCE, she doesn't consider it whatsoever. I dont know what has happened in her personal life, but she is profoundly anti-male. One thing I can tell you is that if you have a very good lawyer and you can rattle her, then parker will back off. The raging bull on the bench turns into a pussy cat and starts acting "girlish". I have seen it happen multiple times. If you have a good lawyer who knows the law and can call her out on it, she will back off. Parker is insecure with low self esteem like your average bully. Let the bullhead rage and have your lawyers watch her make multiple mistakes, THEN CALL HER OUT ON HER MULTIPLE PITFALLS ALL OF A SUDDEN. She will put put her tail between her legs and back off. After that, you have won the case. This is how you win in front of parker. The universal recipe works with all bullies in all domains.

Remember, in Parker's court, if you are a male respondent or petitioner, you are not going against the opposing side. YOUR REAL LEGAL BATTLE IS AGAINST PARKER, not the person you are divorcing. keep that in mind and you are ahead of the game.

Lastly, to the people who say Parker is blind in figuring out who the cluster B narcissist is, you are wrong, she is not blind. Cluster B's are bullies. Bullies dont fight each other, bullies band together to go after a target. Thus, guess why she takes the Cluster B narcissist side? any idea?.....I rest my case

Court Staff

Comment #: CA18764
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The people who work at the family court routinely laugh at her gross incompetence during lunchtime gathering.. Her performance is routinely subject of mockery and "comic relief" by the everyone in the family court building. The day will come when this judge will be forced to resign or be removed from the bench in disgrace. I doubt if she will make it past the 6 year election mark. Her behavior and demeanor on the bench is like a spoiled neglected 4 year old who throws tantrums at anything and everything she doesn't like. How did this woman become a judge?

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA18605
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
WOW. The only reason Parker is not in jail is because she has immunity as a judge. Some of the things she does and the rulings she hands out are downright criminal and she would surely be in jail if she wasn't a judge. IT"S UNBELIEVABLE. I hope the California Judiciary board is monitoring her. There is no way this woman was appointed to the bench by evaluation and voting through a judiciary panel, SHE WOULD HAVE NEVER MADE IT. I can only assume her appointment to the bench was a political one and entirely done by the governor.

Other

Comment #: CA18399
Rating:8.0
Comments:
Judge Parker is a fair Judge. She was able to see both sides and take into a ton of consideration on our wants as parents and the children(s) needs. She listened to both sides equally. Both of us had lawyers. Judge Parker does not lean in one direction of favoritism on male and or female. She knows when someone is lying and will question you when she knows. She does not like hesaid/shesaid situations. She likes facts. So if you are going before Judge Parker make sure you have all your documents together and a priority of the most important issues you want to cover first. I liked Judge Parker even though it didn't all come out in my favor. Due to the massive amount of consideration of the children she had put into her ruling I was happy with the way it turned out. Sad to see her go. Oh if you have a medical condition that effects your ability to show emotions physical or mental provide her a document of this. Either it being a hard time producing tears, paralysis in the face and so forth. She is very understand when she knows of this ahead of time.

Other

Comment #: CA18336
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Pay attention to her behavior, her smirk and her angry words. If you remove the black robe she is wearing, the only thing that is exposed is a raging man hating bully who has an inferiority complex, likely because her father was a much more accomplished judge than she will ever be. She is so shamelessly and malignantly pro-female that even true equality seeking feminist would cringe at her behavior and demeanor.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA17642
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
it's interesting how some say Judge parker protects "females and victims", as you see, it was not said "females THAT ARE victims", I have been to court in front of this judge multiple times, she is clearly pro-female even if the female has committed egregious offenses against the husband/father. Judge parker does not only protects females. Judge parker routinely takes the side of the female despite overwhelming evidence that the female is the criminal. She simply does not like men/fathers and is at the least very incompetent and at the most malignant. Personally, I think it's a combination of both malingering and incompetence. . Dont be fooled by these positive reviews on her. Go to court and see how she tears apart innocent husband and loving fathers. She is not fit to be a judge in family court.

Other

Comment #: CA14543
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge seems angry all the time like a toxic feminist. She pretends that she has the child best interest in mind, but in reality, her mind is only made up on man hating ideology. Dont be fooled by her fancy background, she can easily be fooled due to her over inflated ego.

Other

Comment #: CA12718
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge seemed to be impatient, and was not open to listen to me. She gave 50% custody to the father, even if I brought evidence of his abuse. Well, that same father sexually molested our kid right after getting custody. I can't live with the pain since then. This judge destroyed mine and my kid's lives. She simply doesn't understand abuse, or identify abusers. Children suffer because of unprepared judges like her. If you are divorcing or on a custody battle against a toxic/cluster B personality parent - she won't do anything on your favor. I hope one day reads that. Horrible professional, destroying lives! Please leave this career because you have done enough damage.

Litigant

Comment #: CA12242
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
AS A FAMILY LAW JUDGE: NO UNDERSTANDING OR SYMPATHY IF YOU ARE DISABLED AND HAVE NOT WORKED OUTSIDE OF YOUR HOME FOR MANY YEARS.

Litigant

Comment #: CA12241
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
My only income was alimony. I have had Parkinson's disease for 13 years. My ex retired from a $150,000 + salary. Judge Parker ruled that my alimony be reduced to $500 per month. She said I should sell my home. $500 pays for my medical & dental. Apparently she has no idea of the cost of living.

Other

Comment #: CA11974
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge destroyed my children's future and didn't follow the law in any way. We had solid proof showing my Ex-wife and her family was constantly telling lies and she laughed it off. She was not a fair or resonable judge by any means. Worst judge I have ever had an experience with. If you get assigned to her do whatever you can to get a different judge.

Litigant

Comment #: CA11941
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is absolutely horrible.
Unfortunately I have been involved in the SD family court process since late 2012 and Judge Parker is the WORST judge I have experienced! She rules by the seat of her pants and does not seem to know or care about court rules! Judge Miller was taking over for Judge Parker recently and she was GREAT ...fare, just and worked at fining happy medium in her rulings and keep needs of children front and center. I pray that Judge Miller permanently takes over for Judge Parker!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11819
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Worst judge I have ever seen. She reverses decisions, doesn't hold people accountable to not showing up to court, takes sides without any evidence, is scared to take action, heavily against people in recovery. Completely unfair and has ruined the past multiple years of my life!!! Wish I had other judge who saw completely through my ex in 10 minutes.

Other

Comment #: CA11607
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Pamela Parker saw right through the lies of the petitioner in my case. She is the first person to ever hold the petitioner accountable for her actions and I felt vindicated after hearing her rule in my favor today. Judge Parker is very intuitive and she has great instincts. She knew I was a good dad to my kids in spite of what petitioner and her attorney said about me, and I am eternally grateful to her for that. For anyone else who has their case heard by Judge Parker, all I can tell you is that if you are one hundred percent truthful then you should come out on the winning side.

Other

Comment #: CA10874
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Pamela Parker does not know family law. She also can't see through an abusive man, doesn't take domestic violence seriously and couldn't care less about the best interest of children in a shared custody situation. She should get educated about narcissistic personality disorder, and cluster B personality disorder in general. She gave 50% custody to my abusive ex, right after he was back from deployment. Our kid was 3, and she disconsidered my requests for a gradual adjustment period. My child suffers until today... anxiety and abandonment issues. I begged for her to consider the Domestic violence history, she didn't care. Right after 1 month of shared custody my little girl told me her father was sexually abusing her, by touching her privates. For the love of God, why this judge didn't listen to a mother in need??? Why disconsidered all the signs??? I can't tell how much I dislike this judge. Because of her I share custody with a pedophile. Please judge Pamela Parker, be more attentive and prepared. Shared custody situation when a parent is unfit is traumatic for the children!!!! Shame on you!!! Go do something else. You ruined mine and my daughter's life.

Litigant

Comment #: CA10585
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Pamela Parker, allowed a Plantiff to make a fool out of her, as the Respondent told Judge Parker that the Plantiff was Perjuring himself, and taking documents out of the file, any yet Judge Parker, as educated , as experienced as she is, and a mother, she allowed criminal actions to take place. Shame on you Judge Parker? YOU FAILED!!!!!!!!

Litigant

Comment #: CA10116
Rating:9.0
Comments:
I believe she was fair. I was very honest and my ex tried every tactic to embarrass and discredit me for my dvro. She properly weighed facts and thankfully saw through his facade.

Other

Comment #: CA10005
Rating:10.0
Comments:
After over two years in a custody trial in her courtroom, I can say I am very familiar with this judge. I have been dealing with a narcissist ex for 6 years in court, and this is the first judge who rightly and completely exacted justice for the children in my case. With laser beam precision, she saw through all of my ex's lies and behavior and ruled as the judges in family court are supposed to do, in the best interest of the children! It isn't about a parent "winning", it's about the kids. I have never witnessed a judge in family court so deeply committed to their job, and so thoughtful in their ruling. I consider it a great loss that she will be leaving Vista court in January.

Other

Comment #: CA9978
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This Judge has really let down and disappointed me and my young children. I presented CPS records of all of my children stating that their father hits them, a letter and medical files stating that my daughter is afraid of her father and that she needs anti anxiety medication. I also provided my daughters direct statements of escalated abuse in a forensic interview. My daughter can't even sleep in her own bed, she's too afraid. This judge stated that she doesn't believe that my children are being abused by their father. HOW MANY TIMES DOES A CHILD HAVE TO BE HURT BEFORE SHE CONSIDERS IT TO BE ABUSE!? She seemed to be unhappy with ME for bringing this case to court. My narcissist ex charmed and fooled her and his case was dismissed. My ex looked at me and smirked after she gave her judgement. How can one protect their children and stop the cycle of abuse when a judge allows it to happen? I'm disgusted.

Litigant

Comment #: CA9759
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I CONCUR! This Judge knows little about Family Law/ Court. Has to look everything up - but she was Appellate & Environmental Lawyer in family court? To be Harvard law she made procedural mistake SEVERAL times in my case and has gotten upset to the point she has made decisions and comments that fall under the Definition of Misconduct. She is getting out of Family Court but she is doing SERIOUS damage while she is there, its SAD for the children while do we need to be the proving grounds for Judges like this. Don't sit and take it, go thru the process of Recusing her so it can bring this issues to more light. Obvious if you have a lawyer that is going in front of multiple times a week they will be hesitate to do so because it may effect them and other cases but don't her damage your family any more than needed. The party in your case is already an adversary you don't need the Judge to be also.

Other

Comment #: CA7945
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge does not know anything about family law. She is willing to risk placing a child back in the home of a criminal who hits and abuses a child. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS SERIOUS. She is not taking this matter seriously.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA7230
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She has a definitive pro-female bias

Other

Comment #: CA7018
Rating:1.0
Comments:
During our Divorce case / Trial, I told and showed proof to Judge Parker, that, my Ex LIED about anything and everything that came out of his mouth. Judge Parker allowed my Ex to play her as a Fool, not only should my ex, be Ashamed of himself, of how he Lied over and over, he wasted the Judicial systems time and resources, but Judge Parker, should be embarrassed, that my ex, made her look like the biggest Fool ever. My ex, and his sister, were waiting in the court room lobby, boasting about how easy, that was, to get over on Judge Parker.

Other

Comment #: CA6155
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I really liked Judge Parker. She seemed fair and willing to give the litigants time to present their side. She also has a very keen BS meter and often used it to admonish people who were getting out of control in the courtroom. I love how she would put my husband's ex-wife in her place when the ex-wife would get histrionic and start telling lies that anyone could see through. I went to observe her before she heard my husband's case, and I was very very impressed with how she showed compassion and insight into people's situations, and really tried to bring about the most fair and compassionate result. She is a much better judge than Judge Huguenor, who was, quite frankly, a disaster, as she was incompetent, old and tired and obviously didn't care about the best interests of the children or the parties. She would just rubber stamp whatever the female litigant would demand, without any discernment, anything to get the people out of the courtroom. My husband is still trying to recover from the damage that Judge Huguenor brought not only to his relationships with his children, but also to his finances. He will NEVER get back the years that Judge Huguenor, through her incompetence and laziness, took away from him and his children. Judge Parker is a breath of fresh air by comparison; bright, compassionate, truly committed to bringing about the best and most fair result. I am sorry to see her go.

Other

Comment #: CA5626
Rating:2.0
Comments:
New Judge. Doesn't seem to know what she is doing. Easily falls prey to Narcissist's charm at the peril of innocent parties. Needs to be better educated or go back to the PTA.