Hon. Pamela M. Parker See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Diego County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 35 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Pamela M. Parker


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA25817
Rating:1.0
Comments:
she is not pro-female, she is anti-male

she enjoys hurting and destroying men, she does not have any agenda of empowering women, her primary agenda is to tear men down,

she is a tool, she just doesn't know it, and probably never will

Litigant

Comment #: CA25018
Rating:1.0
Comments:
sorry excuse for a judge,

needs to quit being a judge and get some mental health counseling for herself, she should stop projecting her own anger problems, bitterness and loathing on the respondent and the petitioner, she need some anger management classes herself and maybe a psychological evaluation for suspected personality disorder

she has created a lot of enemies in the legal field and it will sooner for later bite her on the "you know what", she is low IQ pompous ignorant fool

need to get off the bench, she is just terrible

Other

Comment #: CA24770
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Parker was recently assigned to an assistant supervising judge in North County. Her position basically involves supervising a mix of Family cases and Criminal cases.

I am truly baffled how a judge who is clearly a raging man hating pseudo-feminist can be assigned to supervise Family Court cases AND shocked how a judge who has no knowledge of Cluster B personality disorders and has zero aptitude in figuring out who the narcissist or the sociopath can be assigned to a supervise criminal court cases.

Can someone explain that to me?

Other

Comment #: CA24651
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Vicious man hater.

Litigant

Comment #: CA24357
Rating:1.0
Comments:
what a great answer below, i have no doubt it was from a woman

with that logic, I suggest we remove all judges from the bench and replace them with statisticians

parker does not follow evidence or law....parker follows an ideology that only exists in her own mind, not in the real world

Parker is a well known staunch feminist in the san Diego legal community and in the family court system.

Go around the central court house, no judge wants to emulate her, Parker is the butt of jokes in the judicial circles, I have no doubt that she was a phenomenal environmental lawyer, but she is a terrible family judge and she will be removed in disgrace sooner or later, I am willing to bet on it, there is a lot of chatter in the legal community of san diego regarding her demeanor and her rulings, the lawyers of husbands and fathers are realizing who she is and they are filing automatic motion for recusal without cause before even going in front of her, Parker has been exposed for who she is, she cant hide it anymore....the cat is out of the bag

Other

Comment #: CA24150
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Parkers hatred of men has made her into a blind fool. I wonder how many criminal mothers have been awarded sole custody by this raging incompetent miserable pseudo-feminist fool. Not only should she be recused from every family court case, she must be removed from the bench indefinitely due to lack of proper judicial temperament.

Litigant

Comment #: CA23553
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The book on Judge Parker is very simple. If you are a man and your attorney does not issue a peremptory challenge against Judge Parker (CCP 170.6), sue that attorney for malpractice.

Other

Comment #: CA23454
Rating:1.0
Comments:
dear lord, this is horrific. I just read these reviews for the first time.

I'm a male victim of this judge. I have been the CEO of several successful companies. So I would say I am fairly capable and intelligent. During the trial, I kept asking myself "what the heck is going on?".I was starting to think I might be the problem. I kept re-evaluating myself and analyzing everything that had happened between me and my ex-wife. And this judge's rulings were not making sense at all. At first I thought it was the laws that are heavily stacked against me and men in general. But the more I evaluate it and rationalize it, it's not the laws that are the problem. It's this judge in particular that is the problem.

reading these reviews are making it very clear. I am now very upset. I dont know what to do about this, it's been over 2 years since my case has been completed with severe damage to my parenthood and my reputation. Does anyone know how to help me?

Other

Comment #: CA23425
Rating:1.0
Comments:
slowly, but surely, Parker is being exposed for who she really is....an angry man hating bully with pathological envy of mens strength and intelligence

happy retirement

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA23336
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Very happy to have her for female clients. Recuse her as a matter of course for male clients.

Litigant

Comment #: CA21937
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Miserable radical pro-female judge with a fragile ego and deep seeded inferiority complex with relation to male counterparts. Has mediocre intelligence and less than average skill as a judge.

To all the males who are going through divorce in front of her, if you are at least 10 days or more before having your first hearing in front of her, you can file for an "automatic recusal without cause" to remove her from your case. If this is done over and over again and consistently with all male petitioners/respondents, it will create a putrid reputation for her and the higher ups in the state will take notice of it. She will either quit or be removed. To the fathers and the husbands, all of you have to consistently recuse her 10 days before your first hearing. It's very easy to do and you do not need to show cause. It's a legal maneuver that is easy to do. Her man-hating days on the bench are numbered.

Litigant

Comment #: CA21311
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Awful judge. I sat through a morning session where she made three straight "findings" that ex parte notice had been made by woman - with no man present. A month later, a get an "emergency" order from an ex parte where I wasn't given notice.

There is no judge in San Diego County with more than 20 ratings on here (mid 2019) that have nearly as low a rating. This person should not be a judge. Numerous complaints to the coalition of judicial performance are in order for her.

Litigant

Comment #: CA21309
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Been before around 30 judges. This one the worse by a large, large margin. This harms children. She prevented me from placing my son - who had been through so much family court litigation he had become a drug addict, a twice expelled student, and a convicted felon by age 15. Judge Parker saw fit to award custody to his mother. She did so by telephone with the juvenile court judge without ever hearing from the litigants. The boy then proceeded to reoffend. She not only harmed him, creating for sure a lifelong criminal, she harms all of those in society. This individual should not be a judge. Her bitterness, obvious self esteem issues, and marginal intelligence are irretrivable.

Litigant

Comment #: CA20685
Rating:1.0
Comments:
What bizzaro world does this woman preside over? I feel like I'm in an episode of the twilight zone when I'm in front of her. I kept showing her HARD EVIDENCE from DEPOSITIONS DONE on parties involved WHERE THEY ADMITTED to their deeds and crimes. I kept showing Parker BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT evidence that my ex-wife is trying to undermine my career through deception and fraud and consistantly disregarding court orders. . But continued to call me "not credible"..."illogical"..."irrational" and kept saying "this doesn't make sense, why would your ex wife want your career destroyed since she want s child support?".....Maybe, JUST MAYBE, it's because JUDGE PARKER DOESN"T KNOW JACK SQUAT ABOUT CLUSTER B's......I am seriously thinking that parker is delusional to the realities of the facts that are put in front of her. A family court judge who is completely clueless in Cluster B personality disorders DOES NOT BELONG IN ANY FAMILY OR CRIMINAL COURT.....she should go back to environmental law....or better yet just retire

Litigant

Comment #: CA19894
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Rabidly anti-Male and rancidly incompetent. There is no doubt in my mind that she is a staunch miserable feminist and trying to make men miserable. Unfortunately the universe doesnt work that way, she is just making herself more angry, bitter and miserable by being willfully malignant. She doesnt realize that her happiness resides in quitting her job as a judge and focusing on introspection. It's sad to see how she has become exponentially miserable on the bench over the past 4 years. I have witnessed it and actually see the changes for the worst in her in the past few years. I dont feel sorry for her, she is doing in to herself by her man hating agenda. Karma

Litigant

Comment #: CA19718
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Very weak judge. She is easily fooled by crafty wives/mothers more so than lying fathers/husband From my observation, she does not have a feminine bias. I believe she focuses on men because deep down inside she knows the men are the ones that will challenge her authority in court more so than the women. That may very well be true, but many of the women who challenge her authority in court are unchecked because her focus is on the men. If the couple divorcing are somewhat intelligent and educated, they can easily manipulate her and play her. I am referring to both the petitioner and the respondent. She doesnt realize that she is dancing like a puppet without strings being manipulated by the parties getting divorced. Despite her prestigious degree, I don't believe it reflects her intelligence because I dont believe she has the raw intellect to realize that she is being manipulated. What's sad is that I dont believe she will ever see it or realize it. I wholeheartedly believe that she should be removed from the bench. She is just too incompetent.

Other

Comment #: CA19574
Rating:1.0
Comments:
its is clear that this Judge abhors men. She has raging anger towards men underneath the civil facade and the smily mask. However, she is also intolerant of lazy wives/mothers. She usually crucifies men, but at the same time also tells the wives/mothers to go get a job. Since she takes pleasure in destroying me, she has no option to tell the women to go get jobs. Otherwise she would have to answer to someone higher up such as the California Judiciary review board. By ordering the women to go get jobs, she is really just covering her own behind.

Litigant

Comment #: CA19486
Rating:1.0
Comments:
foolish and clueless

Other

Comment #: CA19261
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The overarching and the fundamental problem with Parker is her inability to let her ego and her reputation to take an shameful insult. This woman is not stupid at all. However, due to her female bias, she is easily fooled at the beginning of a case. Further down the line in the case, when there is not a just a couple of pieces of evidence, but a truck load of beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence showing the wives/mothers are being conniving manipulative criminals, then Parker, WHILE KNOWING VERY WELL THAT SHE HAS BEEN WRONG ALL ALONG, will not reverse her own decision unless it's ridiculously obvious to the common person because it will be a shameful insult to her ego for being an incompetent fool and will make her a source of mockery by the other judges and other court staff noticing that she just cant judge correctly and accurately. I read the comments saying "how did she become a judge?"...it's very simple, she is not a judge at all, she was never a judge and she can never be a judge, she just acts like one on the bench

If she had any humility, she would admit she is wrong and not fit for the job and resign from her job instead of continuously misjudging and ruinning families in hopes of one day she might "get the hang of" or "LEARN" to be a judge. Unfortunately, she just doesn't have what it takes to be a judge. Parker's father was a SUPER STAR judge. He was a magnificent judge. It seems like the "judge genes" were all on the Y chromosome and Pamela didn't receive that natural gift that her father had and had polished throughout his career.. Maybe that's why she hates everything that carries a Y chromosome because she is envious of men.

Litigant

Comment #: CA18979
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Absolutely Awful. I didn't realize they let fools graduate from Harvard. Parker rules based on ideology, not facts or laws. If you show her a ton of facts and evidence, if it doesn't merge with her ideology, she will use every "rules of evidence" nonsense to throw out the evidence. If you are able to submit the evidence, she attaches some nonsense to it as "not for the truth of the matter". She will admit evidence even if it's hearsay only if it aligns with her ideology. Anything that does not align with her pro-female, anti-male ideology will be resisted the utmost degree. Furthermore, even if you are able to sumbit HARDCORE EVIDENCE, she doesn't consider it whatsoever. I dont know what has happened in her personal life, but she is profoundly anti-male. One thing I can tell you is that if you have a very good lawyer and you can rattle her, then parker will back off. The raging bull on the bench turns into a pussy cat and starts acting "girlish". I have seen it happen multiple times. If you have a good lawyer who knows the law and can call her out on it, she will back off. Parker is insecure with low self esteem like your average bully. Let the bullhead rage and have your lawyers watch her make multiple mistakes, THEN CALL HER OUT ON HER MULTIPLE PITFALLS ALL OF A SUDDEN. She will put put her tail between her legs and back off. After that, you have won the case. This is how you win in front of parker. The universal recipe works with all bullies in all domains.

Remember, in Parker's court, if you are a male respondent or petitioner, you are not going against the opposing side. YOUR REAL LEGAL BATTLE IS AGAINST PARKER, not the person you are divorcing. keep that in mind and you are ahead of the game.

Lastly, to the people who say Parker is blind in figuring out who the cluster B narcissist is, you are wrong, she is not blind. Cluster B's are bullies. Bullies dont fight each other, bullies band together to go after a target. Thus, guess why she takes the Cluster B narcissist side? any idea?.....I rest my case

Court Staff

Comment #: CA18764
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The people who work at the family court routinely laugh at her gross incompetence during lunchtime gathering.. Her performance is routinely subject of mockery and "comic relief" by the everyone in the family court building. The day will come when this judge will be forced to resign or be removed from the bench in disgrace. I doubt if she will make it past the 6 year election mark. Her behavior and demeanor on the bench is like a spoiled neglected 4 year old who throws tantrums at anything and everything she doesn't like. How did this woman become a judge?

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA18605
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
WOW. The only reason Parker is not in jail is because she has immunity as a judge. Some of the things she does and the rulings she hands out are downright criminal and she would surely be in jail if she wasn't a judge. IT"S UNBELIEVABLE. I hope the California Judiciary board is monitoring her. There is no way this woman was appointed to the bench by evaluation and voting through a judiciary panel, SHE WOULD HAVE NEVER MADE IT. I can only assume her appointment to the bench was a political one and entirely done by the governor.

Other

Comment #: CA18399
Rating:8.0
Comments:
Judge Parker is a fair Judge. She was able to see both sides and take into a ton of consideration on our wants as parents and the children(s) needs. She listened to both sides equally. Both of us had lawyers. Judge Parker does not lean in one direction of favoritism on male and or female. She knows when someone is lying and will question you when she knows. She does not like hesaid/shesaid situations. She likes facts. So if you are going before Judge Parker make sure you have all your documents together and a priority of the most important issues you want to cover first. I liked Judge Parker even though it didn't all come out in my favor. Due to the massive amount of consideration of the children she had put into her ruling I was happy with the way it turned out. Sad to see her go. Oh if you have a medical condition that effects your ability to show emotions physical or mental provide her a document of this. Either it being a hard time producing tears, paralysis in the face and so forth. She is very understand when she knows of this ahead of time.

Other

Comment #: CA18336
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Pay attention to her behavior, her smirk and her angry words. If you remove the black robe she is wearing, the only thing that is exposed is a raging man hating bully who has an inferiority complex, likely because her father was a much more accomplished judge than she will ever be. She is so shamelessly and malignantly pro-female that even true equality seeking feminist would cringe at her behavior and demeanor.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA17642
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
it's interesting how some say Judge parker protects "females and victims", as you see, it was not said "females THAT ARE victims", I have been to court in front of this judge multiple times, she is clearly pro-female even if the female has committed egregious offenses against the husband/father. Judge parker does not only protects females. Judge parker routinely takes the side of the female despite overwhelming evidence that the female is the criminal. She simply does not like men/fathers and is at the least very incompetent and at the most malignant. Personally, I think it's a combination of both malingering and incompetence. . Dont be fooled by these positive reviews on her. Go to court and see how she tears apart innocent husband and loving fathers. She is not fit to be a judge in family court.

Other

Comment #: CA14543
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge seems angry all the time like a toxic feminist. She pretends that she has the child best interest in mind, but in reality, her mind is only made up on man hating ideology. Dont be fooled by her fancy background, she can easily be fooled due to her over inflated ego.

Other

Comment #: CA12718
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge seemed to be impatient, and was not open to listen to me. She gave 50% custody to the father, even if I brought evidence of his abuse. Well, that same father sexually molested our kid right after getting custody. I can't live with the pain since then. This judge destroyed mine and my kid's lives. She simply doesn't understand abuse, or identify abusers. Children suffer because of unprepared judges like her. If you are divorcing or on a custody battle against a toxic/cluster B personality parent - she won't do anything on your favor. I hope one day reads that. Horrible professional, destroying lives! Please leave this career because you have done enough damage.

Litigant

Comment #: CA12242
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
AS A FAMILY LAW JUDGE: NO UNDERSTANDING OR SYMPATHY IF YOU ARE DISABLED AND HAVE NOT WORKED OUTSIDE OF YOUR HOME FOR MANY YEARS.

Litigant

Comment #: CA12241
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
My only income was alimony. I have had Parkinson's disease for 13 years. My ex retired from a $150,000 + salary. Judge Parker ruled that my alimony be reduced to $500 per month. She said I should sell my home. $500 pays for my medical & dental. Apparently she has no idea of the cost of living.

Other

Comment #: CA11974
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge destroyed my children's future and didn't follow the law in any way. We had solid proof showing my Ex-wife and her family was constantly telling lies and she laughed it off. She was not a fair or resonable judge by any means. Worst judge I have ever had an experience with. If you get assigned to her do whatever you can to get a different judge.

Litigant

Comment #: CA11941
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is absolutely horrible.
Unfortunately I have been involved in the SD family court process since late 2012 and Judge Parker is the WORST judge I have experienced! She rules by the seat of her pants and does not seem to know or care about court rules! Judge Miller was taking over for Judge Parker recently and she was GREAT ...fare, just and worked at fining happy medium in her rulings and keep needs of children front and center. I pray that Judge Miller permanently takes over for Judge Parker!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11819
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Worst judge I have ever seen. She reverses decisions, doesn't hold people accountable to not showing up to court, takes sides without any evidence, is scared to take action, heavily against people in recovery. Completely unfair and has ruined the past multiple years of my life!!! Wish I had other judge who saw completely through my ex in 10 minutes.

Other

Comment #: CA11607
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Pamela Parker saw right through the lies of the petitioner in my case. She is the first person to ever hold the petitioner accountable for her actions and I felt vindicated after hearing her rule in my favor today. Judge Parker is very intuitive and she has great instincts. She knew I was a good dad to my kids in spite of what petitioner and her attorney said about me, and I am eternally grateful to her for that. For anyone else who has their case heard by Judge Parker, all I can tell you is that if you are one hundred percent truthful then you should come out on the winning side.

Other

Comment #: CA10874
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Pamela Parker does not know family law. She also can't see through an abusive man, doesn't take domestic violence seriously and couldn't care less about the best interest of children in a shared custody situation. She should get educated about narcissistic personality disorder, and cluster B personality disorder in general. She gave 50% custody to my abusive ex, right after he was back from deployment. Our kid was 3, and she disconsidered my requests for a gradual adjustment period. My child suffers until today... anxiety and abandonment issues. I begged for her to consider the Domestic violence history, she didn't care. Right after 1 month of shared custody my little girl told me her father was sexually abusing her, by touching her privates. For the love of God, why this judge didn't listen to a mother in need??? Why disconsidered all the signs??? I can't tell how much I dislike this judge. Because of her I share custody with a pedophile. Please judge Pamela Parker, be more attentive and prepared. Shared custody situation when a parent is unfit is traumatic for the children!!!! Shame on you!!! Go do something else. You ruined mine and my daughter's life.

Litigant

Comment #: CA10585
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Pamela Parker, allowed a Plantiff to make a fool out of her, as the Respondent told Judge Parker that the Plantiff was Perjuring himself, and taking documents out of the file, any yet Judge Parker, as educated , as experienced as she is, and a mother, she allowed criminal actions to take place. Shame on you Judge Parker? YOU FAILED!!!!!!!!

Litigant

Comment #: CA10116
Rating:9.0
Comments:
I believe she was fair. I was very honest and my ex tried every tactic to embarrass and discredit me for my dvro. She properly weighed facts and thankfully saw through his facade.

Other

Comment #: CA10005
Rating:10.0
Comments:
After over two years in a custody trial in her courtroom, I can say I am very familiar with this judge. I have been dealing with a narcissist ex for 6 years in court, and this is the first judge who rightly and completely exacted justice for the children in my case. With laser beam precision, she saw through all of my ex's lies and behavior and ruled as the judges in family court are supposed to do, in the best interest of the children! It isn't about a parent "winning", it's about the kids. I have never witnessed a judge in family court so deeply committed to their job, and so thoughtful in their ruling. I consider it a great loss that she will be leaving Vista court in January.

Other

Comment #: CA9978
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This Judge has really let down and disappointed me and my young children. I presented CPS records of all of my children stating that their father hits them, a letter and medical files stating that my daughter is afraid of her father and that she needs anti anxiety medication. I also provided my daughters direct statements of escalated abuse in a forensic interview. My daughter can't even sleep in her own bed, she's too afraid. This judge stated that she doesn't believe that my children are being abused by their father. HOW MANY TIMES DOES A CHILD HAVE TO BE HURT BEFORE SHE CONSIDERS IT TO BE ABUSE!? She seemed to be unhappy with ME for bringing this case to court. My narcissist ex charmed and fooled her and his case was dismissed. My ex looked at me and smirked after she gave her judgement. How can one protect their children and stop the cycle of abuse when a judge allows it to happen? I'm disgusted.

Litigant

Comment #: CA9759
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I CONCUR! This Judge knows little about Family Law/ Court. Has to look everything up - but she was Appellate & Environmental Lawyer in family court? To be Harvard law she made procedural mistake SEVERAL times in my case and has gotten upset to the point she has made decisions and comments that fall under the Definition of Misconduct. She is getting out of Family Court but she is doing SERIOUS damage while she is there, its SAD for the children while do we need to be the proving grounds for Judges like this. Don't sit and take it, go thru the process of Recusing her so it can bring this issues to more light. Obvious if you have a lawyer that is going in front of multiple times a week they will be hesitate to do so because it may effect them and other cases but don't her damage your family any more than needed. The party in your case is already an adversary you don't need the Judge to be also.

Other

Comment #: CA7945
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge does not know anything about family law. She is willing to risk placing a child back in the home of a criminal who hits and abuses a child. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS SERIOUS. She is not taking this matter seriously.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA7230
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She has a definitive pro-female bias

Other

Comment #: CA7018
Rating:1.0
Comments:
During our Divorce case / Trial, I told and showed proof to Judge Parker, that, my Ex LIED about anything and everything that came out of his mouth. Judge Parker allowed my Ex to play her as a Fool, not only should my ex, be Ashamed of himself, of how he Lied over and over, he wasted the Judicial systems time and resources, but Judge Parker, should be embarrassed, that my ex, made her look like the biggest Fool ever. My ex, and his sister, were waiting in the court room lobby, boasting about how easy, that was, to get over on Judge Parker.

Other

Comment #: CA6155
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I really liked Judge Parker. She seemed fair and willing to give the litigants time to present their side. She also has a very keen BS meter and often used it to admonish people who were getting out of control in the courtroom. I love how she would put my husband's ex-wife in her place when the ex-wife would get histrionic and start telling lies that anyone could see through. I went to observe her before she heard my husband's case, and I was very very impressed with how she showed compassion and insight into people's situations, and really tried to bring about the most fair and compassionate result. She is a much better judge than Judge Huguenor, who was, quite frankly, a disaster, as she was incompetent, old and tired and obviously didn't care about the best interests of the children or the parties. She would just rubber stamp whatever the female litigant would demand, without any discernment, anything to get the people out of the courtroom. My husband is still trying to recover from the damage that Judge Huguenor brought not only to his relationships with his children, but also to his finances. He will NEVER get back the years that Judge Huguenor, through her incompetence and laziness, took away from him and his children. Judge Parker is a breath of fresh air by comparison; bright, compassionate, truly committed to bringing about the best and most fair result. I am sorry to see her go.

Other

Comment #: CA5626
Rating:2.0
Comments:
New Judge. Doesn't seem to know what she is doing. Easily falls prey to Narcissist's charm at the peril of innocent parties. Needs to be better educated or go back to the PTA.