Hon. Sunil R. Kulkarni See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Santa Clara County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Sunil R. Kulkarni


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA12580
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He picked fight with parties while he handle small claim. He is rude and does not know what he is doing all the times. He seems to like bullies.

Litigant

Comment #: CA12536
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I did not get the chance to complete my comments. Here is moer:
His ruling completely violate my Constitutional rights, including but not limited to, 1st amendment right, equal protection and due process. I do have right to make comment as long as my comments do not violate TRO. My comment was to HOA’s attorney, not even to petitioners. This judge instantly hates non-white citizens. He is evil and enjoys his power to hurt people. He is not white but he thinks he is. He also refused to hear testimony and try to trick me that I can argue more later. But I never get the chance to argue later. He is a liar and a bully. He just wants to bully his way to the court. We, the educated legally immigrated, do not trust he being a judge. He only cares about rich citizens. He is running a drama court, no need to know the laws because he does not rule laws by laws, ignorance of privacy laws.He said it is a common practice for janitor arrived in CID ownership town house to take picture without any permission. He also hates to hear accident. He has a discussing looking when he heard accent. He demanded the other side to file defamation lawsuit against while the HOA manger told many residents that I was mentally ill and no board members like me. He is not white but he thinks he is. He also refused to hear testimony and try to trick me that I can argue more later. But I never get the chance to argue later. He is a liar and a bully. He just wants to bully his way to the court. We, the educated legally immigrated, do not trust he being a judge. He only cares about rich citizens.

In addition, he lied and said that he read my case. However, he stated in the court that
my request for TRO was denied by dep 11, which was totally a lie. It was granted and legally served. Either he does not know what he was doing or he intentionally lied to me and tried to fool me. He indirectly calling me stupid.