Hon. Ralph W Wyatt See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Kern County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Ralph W Wyatt


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA8336
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Made an absolute mess out of the probate calendar; he is way too technical; guardianship cases that used to take 3-6 months were taking 2 years because he had a hearing or trial over every case and he would set up multiple review hearings on each case. It got so bad that if you wanted a hearing in a guardianship, your hearing date was 9 months out. Meanwhile, the kids were living with parents who should not have them or with the person to whom he gave temporary guardianship. I had an uncontested guardianship case that lasted over one year because he kept setting up review hearing. Come on man. There is no one that wanted these kids. My clients were the grandparents who didn't want their grandchildren to end up in the foster home; they were just trying to do the right thing and this Judge was making us keep coming back hearing date after hearing date.

Other

Comment #: CA7750
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Great