Hon. James T Latting See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Riverside County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.8 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. James T Latting


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA16359
Rating:4.0
Comments:
No regard for regular hours. Always late taking the bench. Tolerates oral argument but never strays from tentative ruling.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA14633
Rating:4.2
Comments:
Deliberately ignores settled law, and has never, in 8 cases before him, veered from his tentative rulings - likely written by research attorneys or clerks - as he has no real interest in the proper application of law.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA13899
Rating:6.7
Comments:
Seems to hate non-represented parties; also seems to favor local lawyers. Doesn't seem to like contentious litigation. Case still ongoing after 3 years and judge continued trial out again to next year sending parties to mediation for a 3rd time...??

Litigant

Comment #: CA12620
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Failed in a fair, accessible, effective, and efficient manner, resolve disputes arising under the law and will interpret and apply the law consistently, impartially, and independently to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitutions of California and of the United States. "Short but Sweet".

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA9613
Rating:4.5
Comments:
Took 45 minutes to take the bench. Don't plan to be out of there quick. Also will order mediation before TSC - don't show up at a TSC without having mediated.