Hon. Khymberli S.Y. Apaloo See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Bernardino County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Khymberli S.Y. Apaloo


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA13509
Rating:2.0
Comments:
I think she failed her job by being a judge by favoring female.Despite of lack of credible evidence or documentation from the female, she would rule in favor of her and ignored all evidence provided by the male. She presumes all females are weak and needs support, which are not always the case. In fact, a lot of women are hiding money then crying poor. I wished I had known this before being stuck in her courtroom. GET OUT OF HER COURTROOM AS FAST AS YOU CAN IF YOU ARE A MAN.

Other

Comment #: CA11809
Rating:1.0
Comments:
From the onset, this "judge" it clear that one specific case was more important than the other cases before her. She rushed through them only listening to the women, not the men. She would say "case closed" but if the woman cried, she would continue discussion and make changes. "Case Closed" was mentioned three times and she continued to change in favor of the female not giving any response time to the male. It's clear this judge is a feminist and only interested in representing the wife / the mother / the female. Sad thing is she took information the female gave as truth and gave her final orders without hearing from the man. She is 100% biased for women. I'll be sure to remind the children in my friends case that a female judge took them away from their father after their mother povideded false testimony and offered pictures that were not related to the case. What the mother did not say is that she works with high risk children who lash out and hurt her at work. One child bite her on the arm and she will be on medication for the rest of her life. But pictures of that incident with that child was presented against the father as evidence he abused her. Shame on this woman who calls herself a judge. She's not interested in hearing the truth or being fair. And when is lifetime alimony a fair decision for a 7 year marriage where both parents income is almost the same? What this does is provides an environment where a female can live with someone without getting married just so she can collect alimony for the rest of her life. What was the point of going to a mediator if the judge is going to change everything that had already been agreed upon. What the judge didn't hear is that the father's employment is seasonal and that his last paystub is not a true representation of his annual income or that this year we are supposed to have a much harsher winter (he can't work when it rains). She didn't want to hear from him. So leaving court he knows he will be in contempt of court each month he's out of work because the child support order was more than he can afford. In essence, the father will be paying the mother's apt rent and new car payment every month. We'll see how much of that money goes toward the children. Shame on this "judge". There was no attempt at fairness. She made it clear that she was in a hurry to get to this important other case. In fact, two issued in the paperwork were never discussed. They were not discussed and they are not in the minutes.