Hon. Daniel A Flores See Rating Details
Superior Court
San Francisco County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.3 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Daniel A Flores


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA23443
Terrible judge. He shouldn’t belong on the bench. His parents should be embarrassed that they gave birth to him. He should quit and become a paralegal at best.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA13448
SF court throws people on Family Bench without Family Law experience despite state law re should have a least 2 years. He is rude to lawyers who disagree with him, even when he is completely wrong. I guess it might have to do with him being so short that he pushes back at the slightest little challenge to "his authority." I had a two day trial with him and then all he had to do was run the disso for temp spousal and he still screwed it up, costing my client money. This is about 1.4 years after he started family law. How hard it is to a disso?

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA13391
Easily, the dumbest, least professional judge I have dealt with in my long career.


Comment #: CA10782
Hot headed, uninformed, green, unprofessional