Hon. Ross C Moody See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Francisco County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Ross C Moody


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA40494
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He just accepts and reiterates previous incorrect rulings and has ruled against me 4 times! In error of course on a motion to dismiss a case and 3 quiet title rulings that he ruled were justified. THE MAN IS CLEARLY ARROGANT AND POMPOUS AND IS A DISGRACE TO THE BENCH! Unfortunately for me I have to face him again June 20th, 2022. I'm not certain if I should file for his "removal for cause" It's too risky now if it's denied.

Litigant

Comment #: CA28917
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
this guys an idiot. he awarded attorney fees and made up damages for time spent in small claims. he tripled the amount and thought nothing of it. you may only claim ACTUAL damages in small claims. he just made this up.