"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Alan K Cassidy	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Stanislaus County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 2 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 2 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Alan K Cassidy

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: CA53176
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This Judge is completely biased, ignorant, too hasty in judging without looking at the evidence or the written documents. He sides with sides with men 95% of the time on family court cases. He display his Hatred towards women by ripping custody away from perfectly capable mothers and drags cases out to just to break down the women to make them break down emotionally or financially. He clearly displays his hatred for people with emotional disabilities caused by the men in the first place and ignores the signs of abusive behavior of the fathers. He doesn't care if the Man is a Registered Sex Offender or has a criminal record. He will award custody to the father no matter what the circumstances without looking at any evidence that contradicts the fathers statements in claims or what the mother or other party is trying to plea for their child safety and health. Cassidy also meets with the Plaintiff in Ex Parte communication often and outside the courtroom in his chambers and is often seen by others with the father and children in his courtroom without the other parties. The Father has admitted to having Ex Parte communication without me present with the judge and it's documented on the docket. This judge is has ruined my life financially and relationship wise with my child and my child's life with regards to their safety and mental health. Currently there are other children that have been emotionally abused and worse by the father as well since this judge has awarded custody to the father and this judge continues to hurt families as I see in these comments and have witnessed in the courtroom and have experienced first hand. This judge should not be on the bench. I suggest you get a different judge immediately if you are assigned this judge.

Litigant

Comment #: CA50717
Rating:1.0

Comments:
He comes off biased and ignorant, definitely not the characteristics a judge should have. He has favorites when it comes to attorneys and the attorneys he favors use that to their advantage.
Judge didn't seem interested at all in my side of the story and gave me a horrific ruling for monthly child support. Has me paying way more than the guidelines suggest (38%). With no special needs or circumstances attached. When I tried to voice my concern, he was only waiting for me to finish talking. I was better off staying home that day. He seemed to be driven by something that had nothing to do with me. It was over before it started. These are real people trying to make a living in a real world. You're not looking at a criminal on trial You're looking at a father who needs to maintain stability to consistently provide support but you took that away in 2016. And my life has been upside down since. You were the last line of defense and you could care less. Shame on you. And I hope more people come forward with how they've been mistreated by you as well. If you see him on your sheet for the court date. REQUEST A DIFFERENT JUDGE IMMEDIATELY.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA49188
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge is very bias if this judge is assigned to you you should immediately ask for a different family law judge. I agree with the other comment he will completely ignore evidence once he decided who he likes and doesn't like he is not concerned with the best interest of the child at all and it is very apparent in his rulings

Litigant

Comment #: CA46928
Rating:1.0

Comments:
request a new judge if Cassidy is appointed to your family law case. he is extremely biased, has a bad temper, and ignores any and all evidence brought into court.