Hon. Kevin M Seibert See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Tuolumne County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   4.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Kevin M Seibert


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA53189
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Worst of the worst. Does not read anything or comprehend simple things. He favors the county and covers up pedo issues in his own court with the family law commissioner philip pimenel who was terminated. Not a singe judge is bonded or took the complete oath including the loyalty oath pursuant to California Constitution Artice 20, Section 3.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA52633
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He admitted to not reading anything and on video in a zoom call he denied being served a CCP 170.6 and for cause motion to disqualify as he read the motion on video which was recorded and then he threatened contempt on me for recording his treason.

Other

Comment #: CA46927
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is extremely biased. If you look at his record- always in favor of DA or prosecution.

Completely biased court system in this county.

Other

Comment #: CA26004
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Respectable and respectful, manages to reconcile the letter and the spirit of the law, in a manner that just exudes an aura of fairness and objectivity,no one gets off easily,and all participants leave Judge Seibert's courtroom with an absolutely properly calibrated attitude adjustment. Restores the dignity of the law,thorough,efficient,with such a wealth of charm and character that makes accepting responsibility and accountability feel very inclusive,good and right. Overall, Judge Seibert's performance can truly be summed up in just three words:Justice For All.