Hon. Charles B. Burch See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Contra Costa County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.3 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 8 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Charles B. Burch


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA5831
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I witnessed firsthand the ineptitude of his court in a murder trial. he most certainly was biased towards minorities, allowing clear hearsay testimony in, and otherwise failing to uphold his own standard when it comes to theadmission of evidence. instructions to the jury were cut and pasted and so incomplete its a wonder the case hasn't come back yet. keep it up my sis what is wrong with our judicial system right now and should be removed.

Other

Comment #: CA4778
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Not only does this judge exemplify someone who is well-versed in all facets of the law, he genuinely takes time to hear all sides of the case and make decisions based on fact and reason, rather than emotion. His extreme intelligence is obvious in his personal research.

Litigant

Comment #: CA4377
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge needs to be removed. He is the worst manager of any courtroom proceeding that I have ever seen. He is totally uninterested in what is best for the kids. A complete nut job.

Other

Comment #: CA4361
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In the guardianship case of minor child A.Z., Judge Burch allowed the child to be returned to the parents before drug testing results were submitted to the court. He never enforced his own ruling regarding drug testing, and the results of the drug test were never submitted to the court. The parents had a history of criminal behavior that included domestic violence, felony drug use and sales, and child molestation. The child had been with the guardian for over five years, and was taken from the guardian against both the child's and the guardian's wishes. A year and a half later the child is still hoping to be returned to the guardian.

Litigant

Comment #: CA3722
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Burch made a joke about domestic violence ("Oh, I see no one has any bruises -- that's a start!) when coming back to court after a conference between my ex and our lawyers. Mind you, this is a case in which there was a restraining order being debated because of domestic violence.

This judge talks more than any other person in the room, including the lawyers. His written, legal documents are so badly cut and pasted, that often it is entirely obvious he is not paying attention to, or reviewing what he has written.

He ignores factual, submitted evidence to suit his needs and should never be allowed to determine the fate of any child.

Other

Comment #: CA3000
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Extremly insensitive and uncaring sbould not be allowed to decide the fate of children. Is biased against women and minoritys. Has not kept up with the rules of the court and his rulings are whatever strikes his fancy at that time. Twists facts to fit the outcome he wants. Does not enforce his own orders. Likes to hear the sound of his own voice with lengthy time wasting conversations he has with himself. Is unconcerned with the impact his decisions have on the partys in his court. The reasoning behind his decisions are silly, immature, and embarrassing. His logic is that of a child. I am embarrssed to have him sitting in our Superior Court and angry that he thinks we the people don't deserve better.

Other

Comment #: CA2701
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Has not kept up with current laws. His thinking is outdated which makes him appear foolish and dangerous.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2414
Rating:4.3
Comments:
Judicial activism at its worst. Either unable to comprehend issues or arrogant to the point of disregard for case law, statutes, and facts. Nice guy, terrible judge.

Other

Comment #: CA1723
Rating:3.0
Comments:
He didn't understand the entire case.