Hon. Jill C. Fannin See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Contra Costa County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.2 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Jill C. Fannin


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5432
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Has her mind made up before reading DETAILS of documents. Favors the mother even with drug issues over a tested and clean father. Easily duped by lies. Just wants to clear docket with little regard to evidence.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5431
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Has her mind made up before reading DETAILS of documents. Favors the mother even with drug issues over a tested and clean father. Easily duped by lies. Just wants to clear docket with little regard to evidence.

Other

Comment #: CA5428
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Requests drug testing at $200 ea to disprove false accusations of other party--- all results negative--ignores all results! Drops a restraining order but allows accuser to interpret said order to still be in effect! Blows off an 11 day hiding of a child by parent as inconsequential! She is clueless to the family destruction she wreaks.

Other

Comment #: CA5081
Rating:3.0
Comments:
In following a divorce/custody case, it seems she is easily swayed by belligerent attorneys rather than evidence-photos-statements-police reports, etc. from the quieter opposing lawyer. Does not realize she is being played by an attorney who omits selective pages of subpoenaed documents. Signs off on documents without realizing the opposing attorney refused to accept the incorrectly written order and her rebuttal to said refusal was "omitted" from the judge's viewing!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4799
Rating:8.1
Comments:
She cares and does a credible job. She is very hardworking.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA4726
Rating:4.7
Comments:
Judge Fannin has a complicated calendar. Many litigants appear pro per; some of the represented litigants have a sense of entitlement, and are surprised when Judge Fannin educates them otherwise. She's on an even keel.

Other

Comment #: CA4694
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She conveys a limited skill-set, and has an egocentric demeanor. She ignores evidence, and is fairly incompetent. She should be re-assessed or re-assigned, based on her lack of ability to perform.