Hon. Susanne M. Fenstermacher See Rating Details
Superior Court
Contra Costa County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.1 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   6.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Susanne M. Fenstermacher



Comment #: CA7840
This judge I have seen very bias and does not look into children's best interest. Is known to favor ppl in her circle to rule in their favor there is a case right now going on that has been very poorly ruled. I was in shock and feared for the children's well being. It will be heard again this Monday nov 1 2015. The father's gf knows court personal and the judge and shows how she favors the father in this family case. Never have I seen someone allowed to yell or talk back to the judge with such rudeness and get his demands made. Evidence had clearly been shown. By the fathers negligence drinking issues verbal abuse missed visits he has not completed his parental classes per court order the cps investigation was completely ignored after brought up I saw a poor single mother struggling and pleading her case for custody and to get her children away from this man until further time and changes made on his end his demands of when and where and who to do visit drop offs were met with no question even after the mother stated she did not drive and for he location to be change and the conflict is intrest in who did the drop offs she has stated numerous domestic violence incidents that had occurred under his care that were never questioned or even asked to interview the children's even after it was stated they are being forced to go and it is traumatizing the children. I truly hope this is reviewed and looked into before the hearing Monday for those poor kids sake. God forbid she makes a ruling due to bias conflict of interest with the Father and something horrible happens under his care to the children. It would be an awlful pr hit for the county court system. I myself and 4 other reporters will be present Monday to see the ruling on this family case and write about it to be printed in our 4 publications I encourage more staff and ppl to come and see about this judge


Comment #: CA7716
fantastic judge


Comment #: CA7032
Rating:Not Rated
She is a bad judge who abuses her powers

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA6428
This judge is outrageous. She was removed from the family law division of Contra Costa because she was so incredibly biased. Multiple complaints were filed with the Commission for Judicial Performance. She intentionally miscalculated one litigants support order to the tune of $40,000 per year greater than it should have been. This cannot have been on accident. This has been used as a tactic to cruch one of the litigants on behalf of a favored party. She also toook away custody from a parent in a closed session hearing with no evidence to back it at all. Scrutunize her every move, she can stab you in the back when you are not looking!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA3191
Absolutely wonderful human being. She cannot, however, separate her personal feelings about equity from the outcome, which makes her very result oriented.