Hon. John H. Sugiyama See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Contra Costa County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. John H. Sugiyama


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA4769
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge and his court have outlived their purpose. This court is not competent, and has forgotten the true purpose of the law and the courts.

Other

Comment #: CA4362
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
In the guardianship case of minor child A.Z., this judge allowed the child's attorney J. C. W. to decide on the child's visitation with family members who are concerned about the child. Attorney J.C.W. submitted documentation that he has not spoken with the child in over a year and a half. The child is not being represented in our courts in the way that the law intended, and this judge is allowing court-appointed attorneys to represent this minor child in court, even when they have not spoken to the the child and obviously do not have a client-attorney relationship. This is court child abuse and neglect.

Other

Comment #: CA4293
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is unfamiliar with the cases in front of him. He has a lack of compassion for guardianship cases. He shows no concern for children who want to continue relationships with ex-guardians and extended family members.