Hon. Daniel B. Proud See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
El Dorado County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.3 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Daniel B. Proud


Comments


Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: CA19994
Rating:2.3
Comments:
Judge Proud has major memory issues. His inability to remember what happened at a prior hearing drastically effects his ability to determine if one party is lying and that in turn allows that party to continue to lie hearing after hearing. I agree with other comments that judge Proud is starting to show senile dementia and needs to retire. Just by being allowed to sit on the bench he unfortunately is doing much more harm than good. My wife currently has a family law issue against her ex husband in Dept 5 with Judge Proud and he has made bad rulings. Of course it doesn't help when most attorneys commit gross incompetence and gross negligence.

Other

Comment #: CA16006
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This joke of a judge granted a restraining order against me literally for calling my children during the court ordered date/time for my phone calls. It was granted to my ex father in law. I called to talk to my kids, he picked up and began yelling at me and threatening me. After I hung up on him, he filed a restraining order against me for harassment for the ONE phone call, where he admited on the stand that I was calling to talk to my kids. The “Honorable” Judge Proud granted it and yelled at me not to “bother this man anymore”. This old man needs to retire because he is obviously beginning to become senile.