Hon. Dean H. Hansell See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.2 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   4.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Dean H. Hansell


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA26159
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge D. Hansell is a liar !
I presented evidence re his lies today in open court. All he did was turning his face left and right, trying to hide his shameless eyes, and blushing. There was no argument presented on judge's side. He refuse to recuse himself promised to provide a written statement.
I'm looking forward to see his written statement.

Litigant

Comment #: CA24800
Rating:1.0
Comments:
So many people in the US are falsely accused of domestic violence because of women use protection orders to cut a better deal in the court. There are judges like D.Hansell always ready for bias in a favor for women. My wife accused me in domestic violence on false testimony. Without even checking the facts, D.Hansell believed the false accusations and separated me from my family for 3 years. He disregarded basic father’s rights on the visitation custody. He doesn’t look after the Best interest of the child, or after the Human rights of the parents. That is to the question of honesty of D.Hansell.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA19772
Rating:3.2
Comments:
When he smiles, be careful, he is about to rule against you. Plays favorites.
Get a good looking young male attorney to represent you. Or a woman. Terrible to say, but it's true.
Sometimes very smooth. Sometimes stutters like crazy. If he likes you, or your client, he will give you advantages. He's been an advocate all his life. Came to being a judge only recently so he still plays games. Not transparent. Thinks he cute when he is tricky., He's going to get himself in trouble sooner or later. He's not as clever as he thinks.

Litigant

Comment #: CA13667
Rating:2.0
Comments:
He was bias in favor of my ex wife. He disregarded basic fathers rights on the visitation custody area, giving me an unnecessary hard time just to get some visitation with my kids.
On the money issues, he was also not fair, and gave her attorney fees when she is the one that started the divorce. I gave him strong evidence that she has hidden money and assets.
He is typical of many Stanly Mosk 'judges' who have become agents for the interests of LA County. They don't look after the Best interest of the child, or after the Human rights of the paretns. they work for the best interest of Title 4 money flowing to LA County. He may not know it, but he is part of the big family court Raquette.

Other

Comment #: CA11802
Rating:9.0
Comments:
I have to say..I was shocked. Judge Hansell came prepared and read the both parties moving paper. The reason I say this is my prior Judge B. Scott Silverman, was horrific and biased against women. Judge Hansell was patient, listened and thought about the case. I didn't get the everything I wanted but he was fair and this is why I am shocked. There are very few Judges out there that is good and he is one of them.