Hon. Lawrence P. Riff See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Lawrence P. Riff


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA23193
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23187


""What do you mean Riff “sent you...

My ex obtained a fake TRO against me that turned into a fake 5 year no contact DVRO from Dept 22 judge Hall.

It’s fake because according to local Rule all restraining orders must originate from Dept 8 room 245 restraining order court and they have a separate case number.
It can then be transferred to the judge who has the main divorce case, for a final DVRO, but THE TRO MUST ORIGINATE FRom FROM THE RESTRAINING ORDER COURT... and have a separate case number.."

Comment #: CA23191 ---"Sorry to offend you.
My ex got a fake restraining order against me and I was wondering if that happened to you as well..."


^^^ My ex's lawyer Mary Catherine Bohen, often does all "CAPS" just like in your comment-- but, when lawyers do this--it has been said to be, done by "bad lawyers"-- especially when using all CAPS in blatantly perjured statements.


Many people who have seen my ex's attorneys' mess-ups and obvious perjury , even contradicting their own evidence and Judicail Notice, have said my ex. has very "bad", "sloppy" attorneys--

Others, even add, that when my ex's attorney Richard Gould-Satlman, (and his other lawyer, Mary Catherine Bohen, as well) often uses all "CAPS" --- and many have said, is a very " obnoxious, bad lawyer (who does this) -- especialy when doing it with blatantly perjured statements; (for example , as comment above did-- but you said, your a "litigant"^^) , -----

Mary Catherine Bohen (and my ex's other bad lawyer-Richard-"tricky Dick" Gould-Saltman ) often "BOLDS" , "UNERLINES"-- even doing it shockingly, with blatant perured statements of Material facts-- even after brought to his attention, is "bad, obnoxious
lawyering". ---

Mary Catherine Bohen , used many obnoxious "CAPS" along with a lot of "UNDERLINING", BOLDING", "Italics"in her 1000 page FL320 , reply to one motion of mine...and even did this with Judicial Notice and Evidence--that contradicted, her perjured statements, written in "CAPS", "BOLDING" etc. People were stunned at the blatant, arrogant, perjury and sloppiness -- highlighted by her own doing-- in the 1000 page , excessive reply which again -in which she protested way too much.------- --


And, stunningly, Mary Catherine Bohen put in evidence where I was notifying her, that her statements were perjured and directed her to the contradicted evidence (even often contradicting her own evidence )
and she repeated the perjured statements--

Mary Catherine Bohen even put in Judicial Notice- (with my evidence- and often their evidence) where I had informed Richard Gould saltman of perjured statements-- yet Mary catherine Bohen , Just repeated Richard's perjury-- often in "CAPS" and "BOLDING"-- I as stunned -so are other people-- who again, said, this was the work of very "bad lawyers "and " bad
lawyering." She even often repeated Richard's "tricky Dicks" perjured statements-- while putting in evidence that they were pwrjured- as well as my notification -- yet, she willfully, recklessly repeated them----

But, why do they need to bother being good or honest--tricky Dick or mary catherine Bohen??Because they have so much illegal judge help.

And yet, Mary Catherine Bohen still repeated this false, perjured, statements, which were Material --instead of doing a (SEC 473) correction. Incredible! She even recklessly contadicted, what 3 Appeallate judges opined (and so did Lawrence Riff.)----

Mary Catherine Bohen and Richard Gould Saltman, intentionally ,recklessly created a false record;even when they had so much illicit judicial help.

Every reasonable person knows what went down in my case- even every unreasonable person, in shocked and stunned by judge and lawyer malfeasance, and what went down in my case.

Litigant

Comment #: CA23192
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23187


""What do you mean Riff “sent you...

My ex obtained a fake TRO against me that turned into a fake 5 year no contact DVRO from Dept 22 judge Hall.

It’s fake because according to local Rule all restraining orders must originate from Dept 8 room 245 restraining order court and they have a separate case number.
It can then be transferred to the judge who has the main divorce case, for a final DVRO, but THE TRO MUST ORIGINATE FROM THE RESTRAINING ORDER COURT... and have a separate case number.... "

^^ My ex's lawyer Mary Catherine Bohen, often does all "CAPS" just like in your comment-- but, when lawyers do this--it has been said to be, done by "bad lawyers"-- especially when using all CAPS in blatantly perjured statements.


Many people who have seen my ex's attorneys' mess-ups and obvious perjury , even contradicting their own evidence and Judicail Notice, have said my ex. has very "bad", "sloppy" attorneys--

Others, even add, that when my ex's attorney Richard Gould-Satlman, (and his other lawyer, Mary Catherine Bohen, as well) often uses all "CAPS" --- and many have said, is a very " obnoxious, bad lawyer (who does this) -- especialy when doing it with blatantly perjured statements; (for example , as comment above did-- but you said, your a "litigant"^^) ,

Mary Catherine Bohen (and my ex's other bad lawyer-Richard-"tricky Dick" Gould-Saltman ) often "BOLDS" , "UNERLINES"-- even doing it shockingly, with blatant perured statements of Material facts-- even after brought to his attention, is "bad, obnoxious lawyering".

Mary Catherine Bohen , used many obnoxious "CAPS" along with a lot of "UNDERLINING", BOLDING", "Italics"in her 1000 page FL320 , reply to one motion of mine...and even did this with Judicial Notice and Evidence--that contradicted, her perjured statements, written in "CAPS", "BOLDING" etc. People were stunned at the blatant, arrogant, perjury and sloppiness -- highlighted by her own doing-- in the 1000 page , excessive reply which again -in which she protested way too much.------- --


And, stunningly, Mary Catherine Bohen put in evidence where I was notifying her, that her statements were perjured and directed her to the contradicted evidence (even often contradicting her own evidence ) and she repeated them--

mary catherine Bohen even put in Judicial Notice- (with my evidence- and often their evidence) where I had informed Richard Gould saltman of perjured statements-- yet Mary catherine Bohen , Just repeated Richard's perjury-- often in "CAPS" and "BOLDING"-- I as stunned -so are other people-- who again, said, this was the work of very "bad lawyers "and " bad
lawyering."--

But, why do they need to bother being good or honest--tricky Dick or mary catherine Bohen??Because they have so much illegal judge help.

And yet, Mary Catherine Bohen still repeated this false, perjured, statements, which were Material --instead of doing a (SEC 473) correction. Incredible! She even recklessly contadicted, what 3 Appeallate judges opined (and so did Lawrence Riff.)----

Mary Catherine Bohen and Richard Gould Saltman, intentionally ,recklessly created a false record;even when they had so much illicit judicial help.

Every reasonable person knows what went down in my case- even every unreasonable person, in shocked and stunned by judge and lawyer malfeasance, and what went down in my case.

Litigant

Comment #: CA23191
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Sorry to offend you.
My ex got a fake restraining order against me and I was wondering if that happened to you as well.

When I say fake I mean 6 clerks have already confirmed there is not actual restraining order against me.. oh yes Judge Riff and opposing counsel all present it’s real but it is not in fact real.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA23189
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
@23167. Good catch!
Major “slip” up, on the part of other person, who wrote the comment and referred to your former partner, as the”petitioner.”

How would the person writing a comment, know which party is the”petitioner” , unless they are involved in some manner and have a dog in the fight?

Litigant

Comment #: CA23187
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23167

"What do you mean Riff “sent you”..

My ex obtained a fake TRO against me that turned into a fake 5 year no contact DVRO from Dept 22 judge Hall.

It’s fake because according to local Rule all restraining orders must originate from Dept 8 room 245 restraining order court and they have a separate case number.
It can then be transferred to the judge who has the main divorce case, for a final DVRO, but THE TRO MUST ORIGINATE FROM THE RESTRAINING ORDER COURT... and have a separate case number, "


^^ A lot of questions, from a commenter, who does 'not know me'; and who basically anwere their own question, as well.

Very interesting questions. --

----Why does it even matter, **what date it happened? How would the date, have any relevance to you? -

-- And, more importantly, why was it **relevant, to you, that my ex. who you refered to as the "petitioner", was with me? --

--Why did you even **refer to my ex. as the "petitioner"? What made you assume that?

--Freudian slip? Again, why did you presume to call my ex. . the "petitioner"? --

I have categorically never stated in any comment-whether I am the "petitioner" or my exis the "petitioner" -- yet, my ex's slimy agents, lawyers and certain judges would know this----


Just how many more people have the Gould-Saltmans', tretn lewis , Lawrence Riff involved?--

They know they messed uo--big--(mob mentality) -with people who should never be near my case--all against a vulnerable (non attorney) litigant---


This is how my ex./ the opposing side , has repeatedly messed up-- including Mary catherine Bohen,Richard Gould--Saltman (Freudian Slips- and unable to keep track of lies nd falsities)----especialy since they have greatly under-estimated me and over-estimated themselves.------

They also took it way to far---Richard Gould Saltman, as"chopping at the bits" --to add as many falsities to the record--in his dyuplicious back door tactics-- with no regard to the law, ethics--civility towards oppossing side-- and great disrespect to the court and Judge Riff.------

They force me to single handedly------- go against all of them; who have stunningly abused power and positions=--

ME thinks they do, protest way too much. (And so do many others)----

Litigant

Comment #: CA23186
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
# 23167

One of my ex's corrupt, cheating, perjuring lawyers Richard Gould-Saltman, a pathological perjurer, remained duplicitously in my ex's case, even after my ex removed him; to help equally corrupt perjurer Mary Catherine Bohen; while they (and my ex.) repeatedly lied to judges , such as Judge Riff, acting as if they were so much smarter ,
than Lawrence Riff. --


Lawrence Riff basically gave obsessed, guilty corrupt lawyer, Richard Gould Saltman carte blanch'; to go crazy on his computer, to fill the record with falsities, and ad hominem attacks, against me; when he did not take ownership of his false work product, - wan not even listed as an attorney -any longer-- ( Richard had slimy Mary Catherine Bohen sign her part ; and my ex sign his--in Richard's falsities )---- "big man" that Richard Gould saltmans' is --(actually more like coward--who just intentionally had his client sign perjured statements).Mary Catherine Bohen
did the same.. -------

But , Mary Catherine Bohen does an enormous share of her own lying in the paapers, oral argument-- and to Lawrence Riff, (Byrd/Powell) even under oath; such as, denying Richard was even any longer involved, under oath --(and when I immediately figured it out) -- she falsely claimed she "wasn't required to tell me or Judge Riff." Wrong! And, why did she lie-under oath about this-and numerous other things?---

Mary Catherine Bohen, was also sarcastic and arrogant, mimimizing Lawrence Riff, as the one who sent me to the DV unit-- as if words did not matter-- Byrd did the same , as well.

Their tone {Mary Catherine Bohen's and Christine Byrd's--about Riff sending me to the DV unit] --was also sarcastic and obnoxious-- and disrespectful to Judge Riff . I actually attempted to stick up for Riff during this hiring, -when they were so disrespectful, as memeorialized in the trascripts----

But, Judge Riff allowed attorney abuse, disrespect to me, to him, to the court, to the rule of law, violations of CCP, CRC, the process; while Riff wrongly ignored evidence, failed to protect and remedy me; emboldened my violent ex and emboldedened abusive, perjuring lawyers' who make a circus, out of his courtroom, Mary Catherine Bohen and Richard Gould-Saltman, did.-------

If there every was a case of disqualification for" CAUSE"-- it would be Riff, Trent Lewis, Byrd, others while Dianna Gould Saltman should have never been near my case Lawrence Riff should have recused himsef and so should the others have.
----
Because, they repeatedly made reckless, perjured statements, that were Material - that I brought to their attention-- which even contradicted their own evidence and Judicial Notice. But, instead of correcting their falsities with a (SEC 473) they just repeated the, Not to mention an over copious amount of paperwork- such as about a 1000 (one thousand) FL320 reply, with over 200 evidentiary objections; to just one of my motions I filed.
Riff also did nothing-when I brought this to his attention.-----


Mary Catherine Bohen and Richard GouldS altman (and my abusive ex.) showed an enormous disrespect for Judge Lawrence Riff (among others) the law , ethics and the court process; also causing this protracted litigation--- when I acted in good faith, told the truth, attempted settle , attempted to Meet and Confer (while they repeatedly violated these mandatory rules-: I also asked for a modicum of civility-- and look where it got me......

I told the truth, I was respectful, followed the rules and look where it got me-- even after my ex admitted to repeated acts of abuse.


Therefore, if one of my ex's lawyers/ agents or a guilty judge wrote these questions and comments--shame on them-----

If you're truly a litigant- and had a fake TRO against you--- we must continue call out the corruption.

They (Riff -his cohorts) fail to protect victims-and seem to protect the guilty.-- a long as they have money and /or hired a connected attorney.---

--

Other

Comment #: CA23184
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23167

"What do you mean Riff “sent you”..

My ex obtained a fake TRO against me that turned into a fake 5 year no contact DVRO from Dept 22 judge Hall.

It’s fake because according to local Rule all restraining orders must originate from Dept 8 room 245 restraining order court and they have a separate case number.
It can then be transferred to the judge who has the main divorce case, for a final DVRO, but THE TRO MUST ORIGINATE FROM THE RESTRAINING ORDER COURT... and have a separate case number, "


^^ A lot of questions, from a commenter, who does 'not know me'; and who basically anwere their own question, as well.

Very interesting questions. --

----Why does it even matter, **what date it happened? How would the date, have any relevance to you? -

-- And, more importantly, why was it **relevant, to you, that my ex. who you refered to as the "petitioner", was with me? --

--Why did you even **refer to my ex. as the "petitioner"? What made you assume that?

--Freudian slip? Again, why did you presume to call my ex. . the "petitioner"? --

I have categorically never stated in any comment-whether I am the "petitioner" or my exis the "petitioner" -- yet, my ex's slimy agents, lawyers and certain judges would know this----


Just how many more people have the Gould-Saltmans', tretn lewis , Lawrence Riff involved?--

They know they messed uo--big--(mob mentality) -with people who should never be near my case--all against a vulnerable (non attorney) litigant---


This is how my ex./ the opposing side , has repeatedly messed up-- including Mary catherine Bohen,Richard Gould--Saltman (Freudian Slips- and unable to keep track of lies nd falsities)----especialy since they have greatly under-estimated me and over-estimated themselves.------

They also took it way to far---Richard Gould Saltman, as"chopping at the bits" --to add as many falsities to the record--in his dyuplicious back door tactics-- with no regard to the law, ethics--civility towards oppossing side-- and great disrespect to the court and Judge Riff.------

They force me to single handedly------- go against all of them; who have stunningly abused power and positions=--

ME thinks they do, protest way too much. (And so do many others)----

Other

Comment #: CA23167
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
What do you mean, Judge Riff sent you to the DV unit?

Does the DV Case have a separate case number? Was the initial TRO filed in room 245 .. the restraining order court? And when did this happen? Who was the Petitioner in the DV case.. you?

Was it transferred to Riff in Dept 77 or 22?
What do you mean Riff “sent you”..

My ex obtained a fake TRO against me that turned into a fake 5 year no contact DVRO from Dept 22 judge Hall.

It’s fake because according to local Rule all restraining orders must originate from Dept 8 room 245 restraining order court and they have a separate case number.
It can then be transferred to the judge who has the main divorce case, for a final DVRO, but THE TRO MUST ORIGINATE FROM THE RESTRAINING ORDER COURT... and have a separate case number,

Litigant

Comment #: CA23166
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
--When Lawrence Riff sent me to the DV unit, he never anticipated that my abusive ex. he was protecting, would later admit to the DV violence and numerous physical assaults, that my ex. had denied (falsely), repeatedly under oath, verified declarations RFA's and Rog's .---

While Lawrence Riff, stuck to his false narrative, in the ruling, falsely stating the domestic violence "never occurred" , shocking many people , who could not believe Judge Riff still continued to, commit fraud on the court," help out" connected perjuring lawyers, protect my ex. while falsely ruling that the "Domestic violence "never occurred.----

Lawrence Riff also had the help of equally compromised Christine Byrd and my ex's pathological perjuring lawyers, including Mary Catherine Bohen, who continued the pervasive perjury , of Material Facts (just like Richard Gould-Saltman) ; even when getting so much unethical family law judge help-- even repeatedly lying about service to Riff, Powell and Byrd (when there is receipt, evidence proof).

During the permanent retraining order hearing-- which should have never been questionably transfered to CCW **conflicted, Christine Byrd's **long cause courtroom, by Thomas Trent Lewis; --Christine Byrd not only mocked and disparaged me--(to try to justify her tainted ruling) after my ex admitted to the abuse--

Christine Byrd also mocked and disparaged Lawrence Riff -- in a very sarcastic tone --implying that Lawrence Riff "could not be take seriously"-for sending me to the DV unit. Mary Catherine Bohen did this, as well.....

Mary Catherine Bohen, also used a disparaging and mocking tone, about the fact that Lawrence Riff had sent me to the DV unit--undermining the fact that I went there per "Riff's instructions"... downplaying his suggestion for me to go tthere --

They do 'eat their own'--how ungrateful and disprestable of Judge Byrd and Mary Catherine Bohen to even question what Judge Riff had told me- and suggestion I goto the DV unit--- --
]......when Mary Catherine Bohen, also (like Byrd) really used a disparaging tone , minimizing Judge Riff , while she appeared to be getting so much (illegal) help, and quid pro quo and who actively appeared to be , Richard Gould Saltmans' partner in crime..

Why did Riff even send me--when it was so obvious he was going to continue to protect my abusive ex?

He probably did it it for 'show' , thinking my ex would still deny the abuse -not knowing my ex would get tangled up- and be forced to admit physical assaults against me (while my ex. was still lying and trying to mimimize what he had done.)

I seriously do not think my ex. knew how much perjury his lawyers, like mary catherine bohen had committed (besides his own).....while Mary Catherine Bohen's protections of tricky Dick (did a big disservice to her own client-my ex.) -

And, my ex ( became tangled up)- and seemed unaware of all the attorney perjury ---and this might (and should )come back to haunt them later--in sanctions, and rulings set aside , based on extrinsic fraud.---- as well as all the fees my ex paid his laywers (who did not operate "above board)

I am seriously going to have to take other legal measures, to have justice served---- because the family court judges, lawyer -who worked at the behest of the Gould-Saltmans' know they are in very deep "doo-doo" (as it is said)------ becaause they could not stop themselves-- they involved too many, against one vulnerable self represented litigant.

Again , a FALSE RECORD does not count. So Judge Riff,s Tricky Dick Gouldsaltmans' , Mary Catherine Bohen's arguments , which contradict factsm evidence, the lae, merits are invalid, null and must be voided .

Just how many careers, reputations are going to be compromised, for the whims , entitlements of the Gould-Saltmans' ? --


Just how many careers, reputations are going to be compromised, for the criminal, self-serving schemes of the Gould-Saltmans', who also finacially benefitted??
(which has atocious optics)----

Other

Comment #: CA23157
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23147

"I was astonished to learn, that Judge Lawrence Riff, is Trent Lewis' ** assisstant "supervising judge." Judge Lewis does not know anything about "supervising" the family law dept. that is a complete, lawless mess....


--Maybe Judge Thomas Trent Lewis and Lawrence Riff are scratching each other's backs with "open secrets". Makes you wonder what Riff "has" on Trent Lewis and/ or the corrupt LA family courts.--

--Look at this May 2019; like up 51st Annual Family Law Symposium (summary) Ironically discussing-" New **Rules of Professional Conduct", **Domestic violence, **Un-represented litigants, Rights duringg a divorce, **Legal Ethics...:which the Irony can't be lost---

--Good luck, to anyone who has an appeal in Division 5, appealing a ruling of Judge Lawrencde Riff ; since Judge Riff and Carl H. Moor, Associate Justice, Division 5 , were both speakers at this event (along with, Judge Thomas Trent Lewis)......... "


"Comment #: CA2315

What was promised, to put Lawrence Riff in a position he is clearly not qualified for...

What does he know?

Appearence's of impropriety alone, are very bad,.... who did Riff help and which litigants civil liberties were violated -for him to gain this position so quickly for which he is not qualified?

What secrets and whose secrets is he protecting ; and what possible will Trent Lewis take with him , when he possibly leaves his position in "November"-for Riff to possibly "selectively tale over? Why November?--


Let us watch for any rulings (likely tainted)around that time--- But, they may change up dates, since we have been commenting on this and the corruption . Why such a focus on the "Internet era" ??---

Laws and liberties have not changed that much--they seem afraid that now their corruption and ,malfeasance, can be called out, on the "Internet" and that they can not silently continue to violate rights-without being "called out," on a public forum. Why the focus on family law in the "future"-- what about the "PRESENT "?? ! --

They {Riff, Lewis] must focus on the present and our present civil liberties-- Justice delayed is justice and due process denied!!! "


^^These are very valid questions, concerns and observations....made by many .....and there must be answers, explanations ---

Litigant

Comment #: CA23156
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
What was promised, to put Lawrence Riff in a position he is clearly not qualified for...

What does he know?

Appearence's of impropriety alone, are very bad,.... who did Riff help and which litigants civil liberties were violated -for him to gain this position so quickly for which he is not qualified?

What secrets and whose secrets is he protecting ; and what possible will Trent Lewis take with him , when he possibly leaves his position in "November"-for Riff to possibly "selectively tale over? Why November?--


Let us watch for any rulings (likely tainted)around that time--- But, they may change up dates, since we have been commenting on this and the corruption . Why such a focus on the "Internet era" ??---

Laws and liberties have not changed that much--they seem afraid that now their corruption and ,malfeasance, can be called out, on the "Internet" and that they can not silently continue to violate rights-without being "called out," on a public forum. Why the focus on family law in the "future"-- what about the "PRESENT "?? ! --

They {Riff, Lewis] must focus on the present and our present civil liberties-- Justice delayed is justice and due process denied!!!

Litigant

Comment #: CA23155
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
What was promuised, to put Lawrence Riff in a position he is clearly not qualified for...

What does he know? Appearences of impropriety alone, are very bad,.... who did Riff help and which litigants civil liberties were violated -for himto gain this position so quickly for which he is not qualified?

What secrets and whose secrets is he protecting ; and what poosible will Trent Lewis take with him , when he possibly leaves his position in "November"-for Riff to possibly "selectively tale over?

Why November? Let us watch for any rulings (likely tainted)around that time--- But, they may change up dates, suince we have been commenting on this and the corruption .

Why such a focus on the "internet era" Laws and liberties have not changed that much--they seem afraid that now their corruption and ,alfeasance, can be called out, on the "internet" and that they can not silently continue to violate rights-without being "called out," on a public forum.


Whay the focus on family law in the "future"-- what about the "PRESENT "?? !

They {Riff, Lewis] must focus on the present anfd our present coivil liberties-- Justice delayed is justice and due process denied!!!

Litigant

Comment #: CA23153
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23152



*assisstant

"I was astonished to learn, that Judge Lawrence Riff, is Trent Lewis' **asssisstant "supervising judge." Judge Lewis does not know anything about "supervising" the family law dept. that is a complete, lawless mess....

Something is very **wrong about all of this!

Other

Comment #: CA23152
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23147

"I was astonished to learn, that Judge Lawrence Riff, is Trent Lewis' "supervising judge." Judge Lewis does not know anything about "supervising" the family law dept. that is a complete, lawless mess....


--Maybe Judge Thomas Trent Lewis and Lawrence Riff are scratching each other's backs with "open secrets". Makes you wonder what Riff "has" on Trent Lewis and/ or the corrupt LA family courts.--

--Look at this May 2019; like up 51st Annual Family Law Symposium (summary) Ironically discussing-" New **Rules of Professional Conduct", **Domestic violence, **Un-represented litigants, Rights duringg a divorce, **Legal Ethics...:which the Irony can't be lost---

--Good luck, to anyone who has an appeal in Division 5, appealing a ruling of Judge Lawrencde Riff ; since Judge Riff and Carl H. Moor, Associate Justice, Division 5 , were both speakers at this event (along with, Judge Thomas Trent Lewis).........

51st Annual Family Law Symposium; Effective Family Law Practice in the Internet Era"

Program description:

Experienced and distinguished Judicial Officers, Attorneys, evolving aspects of the practice of family law....---



8:30–9:00 AM – Introductions/>>>State of Department 2 and Family Law Future

---"Hon. >>>Thomas Trent Lewis, Supervising Judge, Family Law Division, Los Angeles Superior Court ..."


Panel 1 Enforcing Family Law Orders and Judgments . This panel will focus on enforcing family law orders and judgments.

Speakers:

-->>>*Hon. Carl H. Moor, Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District, Division 5---- ...


-->>>*Lawrence P. Riff, Assistant Supervising Judge, Family Law Division, Los Angeles Superior Court--
.."

In the Shadow of Culture: Making Invisible, Visible


An examination of ways to intervene when micro/macro aggressions arise ...... issues specific to foreign litigants in family court, ...’ understanding of rights in a divorce, domestic violence, ... Asian and African experience.--

Speakers: .....


"-->>>*Hon. Thomas Trent Lewis, Supervising Judge, Family Law Division, Los Angeles Superior Court-- ..."

^^DOJ must intervene! Besides the Irony of topics , which are not being enforced in the family courts ... are confounding. Something appears incredibly amiss.

We need to closely monitor rulings in the lower courts, appellate courts and Judge Riff's incredibly fast, questionable move , "up the ladder; way too quickly"

^^Look: - "*Lawrence P. Riff, Assistant Supervising
Judge ??!


And, "Judge Moor Division 5" and Judge Lewis, Judge Riff all speaker's at this event?? I already see a huge conflcit , that will harm a certain litigant, even more; if that is even possible. YES, something is incredibly amiss!

We need to keep our eyes wide open, as well as, our mouths, to continue to call out, gross injustices and those 'justices" who actively cause, these injustices,"

^^What was promised? What favors were traded, at the expense of civil liberties of litigants'. What did Lawrence Riff have to do , promise in exchange for being assisstant Supervising Judge of the family courts, when he is clearly new, unqualified..

Other

Comment #: CA23151
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23147

"I was astonished to learn, that Judge Lawrence Riff, is Trent Lewis' **Assisstant "supervising judge. " Judge Lewis does not know anything about "supervising" the family law dept. that is a complete, lawless mess....
rumor has it he will take over for Trent Lewis--while something is very, very amiss!

Litigant

Comment #: CA23147
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23146


"I was astonished to learn, that Judge Lawrence Riff, is Trent Lewis' "supervising judge." Judge Lewis does not know anything about "supervising" the family law dept. that is a complete, lawless mess....


--Judge Lawrence Riff does not about family law or every understand it. Talk about the blind (criminals) , leading the blind (criminals).---

--Maybe Judge Thomas Trent Lewis and Lawrence Riff are scratching each other's backs with "open secrets". Makes you wonder what Riff "has" on Trent Lewis and/ or the corrupt LA family courts.--

--Look at this May 2019; like up 51st Annual Family Law Symposium (summary) Ironically discussing-" New **Rules of Professional Conduct", **Domestic violence, **Un-represented litigants, Rights duringg a divorce, **Legal Ethics...:which the Irony can't be lost---

--Good luck, to anyone who has an appeal in Division 5, appealing a ruling of Judge Lawrencde Riff ; since Judge Riff and Carl H. Moor, Associate Justice, Division 5 , were both speakers at this event (along with, Judge Thomas Trent Lewis).........

51st Annual Family Law Symposium; Effective Family Law Practice in the Internet Era"

Program description:

Experienced and distinguished Judicial Officers, Attorneys, and a Mental Health Professional will guide you through rapidly evolving aspects of the practice of family law....---



8:00–8:30 AM Registration and Breakfast

8:30–9:00 AM – Introductions/>>>State of Department 2 and Family Law Future

---Hon. >>>Thomas Trent Lewis, Supervising Judge, Family Law Division, Los Angeles Superior Court


Panel 1 Enforcing Family Law Orders and Judgments . This panel will focus on enforcing family law orders and judgments.

Speakers:

-->>>*Hon. Carl H. Moor, Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District, Division 5----


--Hon. Audra M. Mori, Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court--

-->>>*Lawrence P. Riff, Assistant Supervising Judge, Family Law Division, Los Angeles Superior Court--

--Ira M. Friedman, CFLS, Partner, Friedman and Friedman----

In the Shadow of Culture: Making Invisible, Visible


An examination of ways to intervene when micro/macro aggressions arise in the context of family law; litigation involving same-sex and non-heteronormative families; issues specific to foreign litigants in family court, including language barriers, cultural differences affecting litigants’ understanding of rights in a divorce, domestic violence, ... Asian and African experience.--

Speakers:

--Amaka Akudinobi,--Jinna Kang, Esq., APC--
--Gitu Bhatia, Psy.D., Clinical Psychologist--
--Diane M. Goodman, Esq.,

-->>>*Hon. Thomas Trent Lewis, Supervising Judge, Family Law Division, Los Angeles Superior Court-- ..."

^^DOJ must intervene! Besides the Irony of topics , which are not being enforced in the family courts , the conflicts of interest within the LA family courts and even on the panel at this Family Law Symposium; are confounding. Something appears incredibly amiss.

We need to closely monitor rulings in the lower courts, appellate courts and Judge Riff's incredibly fast, questionable move , "up the ladder; way too quickly"

^^Look: - *Lawrence P. Riff, Assistant Supervising
Judge

Judge Riff "Assistant Supervising"Judge? This can't be possible?!! Who decided this? Judge Lewis, to cover his butt?

And, "Judge Moor Division 5" and Judge Lewis, Judge Riff all speaker's at this event?? I already see a huge conflcit , that will harm a certain litigant, even more; if that is even possible. YES, something is incredibly amiss!

We need to keep our eyes wide open, as well as, our mouths, to continue to call out, gross injustices and those 'justices" who actively cause, these injustices,

Other

Comment #: CA23146
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23145

"I was astonished to learn, that Judge Lawrence Riff, is Trent Lewis' "supervising judge." Judge Lewis does not know anything about "supervising" the family law dept. that is a complete, lawless mess....


--Judge Lawrence Riff does not about family law or every understand it. Talk about the blind (criminals) , leading the blind (criminals).---

--Maybe Judge Thomas Trent Lewis and Lawrence Riff are scratching each other's backs with "open secrets". Makes you wonder what Riff "has" on Trent Lewis and/ or the corrupt LA family courts.--

--Look at this May 2019; like up 51st Annual Family Law Symposium (summary) Ironically discussing-" New **Rules of Professional Conduct", **Domestic violence, **Un-represented litigants, Rights duringg a divorce, **Legal Ethics...:which the Irony can't be lost---

--Good luck, to anyone who has an appeal in Division 5, appealing a ruling of Judge Lawrencde Riff ; since Judge Riff and Carl H. Moor, Associate Justice, Division 5 , were both speakers at this event (along with, Judge Thomas Trent Lewis).........

51st Annual Family Law Symposium; Effective Family Law Practice in the Internet Era"

Program description:

Experienced and distinguished Judicial Officers, Attorneys, and a Mental Health Professional will guide you through rapidly evolving aspects of the practice of family law....---



8:00–8:30 AM Registration and Breakfast

8:30–9:00 AM – Introductions/>>>State of Department 2 and Family Law Future

---Hon. >>>Thomas Trent Lewis, Supervising Judge, Family Law Division, Los Angeles Superior Court


Panel 1 Enforcing Family Law Orders and Judgments . This panel will focus on enforcing family law orders and judgments.

Speakers:

-->>>*Hon. Carl H. Moor, Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District, Division 5----


--Hon. Audra M. Mori, Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court--

-->>>*Lawrence P. Riff, Assistant Supervising Judge, Family Law Division, Los Angeles Superior Court--

--Ira M. Friedman, CFLS, Partner, Friedman and Friedman----

In the Shadow of Culture: Making Invisible, Visible


An examination of ways to intervene when micro/macro aggressions arise in the context of family law; litigation involving same-sex and non-heteronormative families; issues specific to foreign litigants in family court, including language barriers, cultural differences affecting litigants’ understanding of rights in a divorce, domestic violence, ... Asian and African experience.--

Speakers:

--Amaka Akudinobi,--Jinna Kang, Esq., APC--
--Gitu Bhatia, Psy.D., Clinical Psychologist--
--Diane M. Goodman, Esq.,

-->>>*Hon. Thomas Trent Lewis, Supervising Judge, Family Law Division, Los Angeles Superior Court-- ..."

^^DOJ must intervene! Besides the Irony of topics , which are not being enforced in the family courts , the conflicts of interest within the LA family courts and even on the panel at this Family Law Symposium; are confounding. Something appears incredibly amiss.

We need to closely monitor rulings in the lower courts, appellate courts and Judge Riff's incredibly fast, questionable move , "up the ladder; way too quickly.

Other

Comment #: CA23145
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I was astonished to learn, that Judge Lawrence Riff, is Trent Lewis' "supervising judge." Judge Lewis does not know anything about "supervising" the family law dept. that is a complete, lawless mess....


--Judge Lawrence Riff does not about family law or every understand it. Talk about the blind (criminals) , leading the blind (criminals).---

--Maybe Judge Thomas Trent Lewis and Lawrence Riff are scratching each other's backs with "open secrets". Makes you wonder what Riff "has" on Trent Lewis and/ or the corrupt LA family courts.--

--Look at this May 2019; like up 51st Annual Family Law Symposium (summary) Ironically discussing-" New **Rules of Professional Conduct", **Domestic violence, **Un-represented litigants, Rights duringg a divorce, **Legal Ethics...:which the Irony can't be lost---

--Good luck, to anyone who has an appeal in Division 5, appealing a ruling of Judge Lawrencde Riff ; since Judge Riff and Carl H. Moor, Associate Justice, Division 5 , were both speakers at this event (along with, Judge Thomas Trent Lewis).........

51st Annual Family Law Symposium; Effective Family Law Practice in the Internet Era"

Program description:

Experienced and distinguished Judicial Officers, Attorneys, and a Mental Health Professional will guide you through rapidly evolving aspects of the practice of family law....---



8:00–8:30 AM Registration and Breakfast

8:30–9:00 AM – Introductions/>>>State of Department 2 and Family Law Future

---Hon. >>>Thomas Trent Lewis, Supervising Judge, Family Law Division, Los Angeles Superior Court


Panel 1 Enforcing Family Law Orders and Judgments . This panel will focus on enforcing family law orders and judgments.

Speakers:

-->>>*Hon. Carl H. Moor, Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District, Division 5----


--Hon. Audra M. Mori, Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court--

-->>>*Lawrence P. Riff, Assistant Supervising Judge, Family Law Division, Los Angeles Superior Court--

--Ira M. Friedman, CFLS, Partner, Friedman and Friedman----

In the Shadow of Culture: Making Invisible, Visible


An examination of ways to intervene when micro/macro aggressions arise in the context of family law; litigation involving same-sex and non-heteronormative families; issues specific to foreign litigants in family court, including language barriers, cultural differences affecting litigants’ understanding of rights in a divorce, domestic violence, ... Asian and African experience.--

Speakers:

--Amaka Akudinobi,--Jinna Kang, Esq., APC--
--Gitu Bhatia, Psy.D., Clinical Psychologist--
--Diane M. Goodman, Esq.,

-->>>*Hon. Thomas Trent Lewis, Supervising Judge, Family Law Division, Los Angeles Superior Court--

--Abbas Hadjian, Esq., CFLS.,Law Offices of Abbas Hadjian (APC)--

12:15-1:15 Luncheon

1:15-2:45 Panel 3 (Legal Ethics Credit)

Brave New World for Family Lawyers: the New Rules of Professional Conduct
The panel will discuss the newly enacted Rules of Professional Conduct ..other issues of ethics and professional responsibility....----

Speakers:
-Hon. Hank Goldberg (Ret.),;-Marlo Van Oorschot, Esq.
-Jennifer Saunders, Certified Specialist in >>Legal -Malpractice Law, Partner, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP; David B. Parker, Certified Specialist in>> Legal --Malpractice Law, Partner, Parker Mills LLP;-

--Panel 4--
Unbundling Legal Services: Building Your Practice by Increasing Legal Access


---The increase of unrepresented litigants offers an opportunity for family lawyers to deliver needed profitable limited scope services ......ethics to overcome ethical challenges.--

Speakers:
Forrest S. Mosten, CFLS, Mediator and Limited Scope Attorney Terri J. Breer, Elizabeth Potter Scully,
Ana M. Storey, Esq., Executive Director, LevittQuinn --

CLE
6.25 hrs CLE credit (Includes 6.25 hrs **Family Law Legal Specialization Credit, includes 1.5 hrs. **Legal Ethics credit)---

5/4/2019 ; 8:30 AM - 4:30 PM Where
Hilton Hotel Universal

Other

Comment #: CA23144
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23141 "There seems to be, no sign of intelligent life, anywhere ..", in Dept 77 on Hill St. or within any LA county family law bar, courtrooms.


^^With the exception , of bada#s pro pers , giving Judge Riff and his buddies, a run for their money, while also trying to run from their crimes, corruption and abuses of their positions.

Other

Comment #: CA23143
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23141

"There seems to be, no sign of intelligent life, anywhere ..", in Dept 77 on Hill St. or within any LA county family law bar, courtrooms.

^^With the exception , of bada#s pro pers , giving Judge Riff and his buddies, a run for their money, while alos trying to run from their crimes and abuses of their positions.

Other

Comment #: CA23141
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
"There seems to be, no sign of intelligent life, anywhere ..", in Dept 77 on Hill St. or within any LA county family law bar, courtrooms.

Litigant

Comment #: CA23140
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Some conservatives have called ANTIFA-to paraphrase: "..group of anti-civil liberties criminals who use terror tactics to silence free speech..."-- **(sounds like Lawrence Riff, Michael Powell and Trent Lewis, Christine Byrd- and other family law judges )-----

." "They only attack in mobs however, because they’re cowards and chumps, they’re afraid to do it alone..." "specializes in violent attacks on females and others who are defenseless..." **((sounds like "tricky Dick" and Dianna Gould-Saltman - and those working at their behest-- Lawrence Riff, Michael Powell and Trent Lewis, Christine Byrd, Tamara Hall)- and other family law judges, their favored lawyers )----


"They’re chumps & cowards .......who only attack in packs ......." ......**( sounds like "tricky Dick" and Dianna Gould-Saltman - and those working at their behest-- Lawrence Riff, Michael Powell and Trent Lewis, Christine Byrd, Tamara Hall)- and other family law judges, their favored lawyers )----

They’re chumps & cowards .......who only attack in packs ......."because they’re weak, sorry, pathetic human beings organization committed to attacking civil liberties and free speech...." -- ......**( sounds like "tricky Dick" and Dianna Gould-Saltman - and those working at their behest-- Lawrence Riff, Michael Powell and Trent Lewis, Christine Byrd, Tamara Hall)- and other family law judges, their favored lawyers )----


^^Sounds just like Lawrence Riff and the Gould-Saltman criminal enterprise, and their pack of cronies--including Trent Lewis, Christine Byrd, Tamara Hall..who engaged in illegal, conduct; violations of my civil liberties--all against one pro per (me)... ....

What does this say about Richard "tricky Dick" Gould Saltman, who couldn't handle going against a pro per? So he illegally ran to his wife and her colleagues for help, while judges like Riff were more than willing to acquiesce.--

What does this say about Lawrence Riff, Dianna Gould-Saltman and their band of crooked judges and lawyers? ...
.

Litigant

Comment #: CA23136
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
"Comment #: CA23134

Some are asking, "What even is going on in Portland? Are they just going to wait for someone to get killed?"___


I ask, "What even is going in the Judge Lawrence Riff's family law courtroom? Is he just going to wait for victims of documented domestic violence, to get killed?"___


I ask, "What even is going in the LASC family law courtrooms? Are they just going to wait for victims of documented domestic violence to get killed?"___

#TommyMESS

#Riffraff

"Riff-raff" = disreputable. Not to be confused with the rapper. "



^^ Some conservatives have called ANTIFA-to paraphrase: "..group of anti-civil liberties criminals who use terror tactics to silence free speech....."

"They only attack in mobs however, because they’re cowards and chumps, they’re afraid to do it alone..."

"specializes in violent attacks on females and others who are defenseless..."

"They’re chumps & cowards who only attack in packs because they’re weak, sorry, pathetic human beings
organization committed to attacking civil liberties and free speech...."

^^Sounds just like Lawrence Riff and the Gould-Saltman criminal enterprise, and their pack of cronies--including Trent Lewis, Christine Byrd...who engaged in illegal, conduct; violations of my civil liberties--all against one pro per (me)...

What does this say about Richard Gould Saltman, who couldn't handle going against a pro per? So he illegally ran to his wife and her colleagues for help, while judges like Riff were more than willing to acquiesce. What does this say about Lawrence Riff, Dianna Gould-Saltman and their band of criminal judges?

Litigant

Comment #: CA23134
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Some are asking, "What even is going on in Portland? Are they just going to wait for someone to get killed?"___


I ask, "What even is going in the Judge Lawrence Riff's family law courtroom? Is he just going to wait for victims of documented domestic violence, to get killed?"___


I ask, "What even is going in the LASC family law courtrooms? Are they just going to wait for victims of documented domestic violence to get killed?"___

#TommyMESS

#Riffraff

"Riff-raff" = disreputable. Not to be confused with the rapper.

Litigant

Comment #: CA23133
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
How is the Portland situation any different than dept 77, 2, 22,
on Hill? ---


How is the Portland situation any different than the Lawrence Riff and likeminded colleague situation, of misogynistic judges, like Riff who sent the message to my ex that violence was acceptable ("for a price")?--

Judge Riff and others have forfeited their right to complain about groups they feel are violent, such as ANTIFA-- because ANTIFA does not attempt to claim they are something, they are
not.----


On the other hand, Judge Riff swore to uphold the law, civil liberties, justice -which he routinely breaks/violates, in a "play to pay" criminal enterprise- where those with money, connected lawyer, lawyer married to his judge colleague , such as Dianna Gould-Saltman, will prevail-- even if a violent male, committed repeated perjury about the domestic violence and later admitted it-- even when he abusive perjuring lawyers- committed repeated reckless, intentional perjury of Material facts....

And. when corrupt perjuring lawyers, such as "tricky Dick" and Mary Catherine Bohen, continue to repeatedly commit perjury-- where Mary Catherine Bohen, seems more worried about protecting, Tricky Dick,and his lies and misdeed, continuing the lies, this doesa great disservice to her client (my abusive ex.). ---

And, if they [my ex's corrupt , perjuring lawyers]think the repeated perjury is acceptable,(even after they were getting so much help from Riff-they're wrong, wrong, wrong-- but I guess their perjury helps Riff's, Trent Lewis's and Byrd's false narratives----

They also continued marginalizing of the abuse, and personal attacks against me-- as well as their deflections from their own wrongdoings -against me; and if they think this is helping my ex.--they have greatly underestimated what I will continue to Legally do to achieve justice.---


-Key word "legally"- a word that Riff, and my ex's lawyers have seem to have forgotten.---

Lawrence Riff's courtroom , might as well be "Portland" today. There are also many "Proud" 'BOY'-'Lady' judges- who routinely violate the law and civil liberties- in their biases and prejudices against females, the poor and victims of domestic violence-- and protect violent men- who have admitted to the violence-- but that is not their narrative -- when the Gould-Saltmans' deep pockets-filled with dark money and unjust financial gain from the lawlessness, quid pro quo, obstruction of justice, are involved.----

Still arguably appears, like "Bribery" to me and many others-- when my ex pays "tricky Dick' and then he unlawfully runs to wife and her colleagues- to conspire to rig outcomes of rulings and obstruct
justice. --

Litigant

Comment #: CA23132
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23130
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Lawrence Riff, dept 77 Stanley Mosk, creates an unfair situation for pro pers, females vulnerable, non -connected; with willful, reckless intent to help colleagues, males and the well connected , including his favored lawyers. _____

Dept 77, Lawrence Rii'f courtroom, is filled with unlevel playing fields, for pro-pers , where Riff routinely denies requested attorney fee's and costs failing to remedy the disparity...while routinely striking valid motions by pro pers (just to help the cover-ups) of Riff's favored corrupt lawyers on opposing side...and ignoring attorney perjury of Material Facts, when brought to Riff's attention-afecting putcome of case _____

Lawrence Riff's courtroom reaks with ---gender inequality____gender stereotypes_____gender bias_______imbalanced playing fields_____unequal opportunity___unbalanced situation______quid pro quo___improper influences of ThoMESS Trent-Lewis______improper extrajudicial , exparte communications____violations of due process_______unjustness_______Protections for well funded violent, perjuring male parties____


__add butt kissing the corrupt a**es of colleage and colleague's equally corrupt, attorney spouse , such as "tricky Dick" , unethically falsifying record, with queen perjerer , dishonest, disreputable, Mary Catherine Bohen--(who routinely pulls the wool over Riff--refusing to correct perjured statements-when brought to her attention-and own eveidence )____ add Riff's disregard for the best interest and safety, of the most vulnerable, children, victims of domestic violence, the disabled, the elderly_______

^^DEpt 77, Lawrence Riff's, RiffRAFF Courtroom, in a NUTshell....

#TommyMess -- #RiffRAFF

^^^^How is the Portland situation any different than the Lawrence Riff and likeminded colleague situation of misogynistic judges. like Riff who sent the message to my ex that violence was acceptable.

Judge Riff and others have forfeited their right to complain about groups they feel are violent , such as ANTIFA-- because ANTIFA does not attempt to claim they are something, they are not.

On the other hand, Judge Riff swore to uphold the law, civil liberties, justice -which he routinely breaks/violates, in a "play to pay" criminal enterprise- where those with money, connected lawyer, lawyer married to his judge colleague, will prevail-- even if a violent male committed repeated perjury about the domestic violence and later admitted it.

And. when corrupt perjuring lawyers, such as tricky Dick and Mary Catherine Bohen, continue to repeatedly commit perjury-- where Mary Catherine seems more worried about protecting, Tricky Dick, doing a great disservice to her client (my abusive ex.).


And, if they think the repeated perjury,(even after they were getting so much help from Riff- but I guess their perjury helps Riff's, Trent Lewis's and Byrd's false narratives) marginalizing of the abuse, and personal attacks against me-- as well as their deflections from their own wrongdoings -against me-- they have greatly underestimated what I will continue to Legally do to achieve justice--Key word "legally"- that Riff, and my ex's lawyers have seem to have forgotten,

Lawrence Riff's courtroom , might as well be "Portland" today.

There are also many "Proud" 'BOY'-'Lady' judges- who routinely violate the law and civil liberties- in their biases and prejudices against females, the poor and victims of domestic violence.

Litigant

Comment #: CA23130
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Lawrence Riff, dept 77 Stanley Mosk, creates an unfair situation for pro pers, females vulnerable, non -connected; with willful, reckless intent to help colleagues, males and the well connected , including his favored lawyers. _____

Dept 77, Lawrence Rii'f courtroom, is filled with unlevel playing fields, for pro-pers , where Riff routinely denies requested attorney fee's and costs failing to remedy the disparity...while routinely striking valid motions by pro pers (just to help the cover-ups) of Riff's favored corrupt lawyers on opposing side...and ignoring attorney perjury of Material Facts, when brought to Riff's attention-afecting putcome of case _____

Lawrence Riff's courtroom reaks with ---gender inequality____gender stereotypes_____gender bias_______imbalanced playing fields_____unequal opportunity___unbalanced situation______quid pro quo___improper influences of ThoMESS Trent-Lewis______improper extrajudicial , exparte communications____violations of due process_______unjustness_______Protections for well funded violent, perjuring male parties____


__add butt kissing the corrupt a**es of colleage and colleague's equally corrupt, attorney spouse , such as "tricky Dick" , unethically falsifying record, with queen perjerer , dishonest, disreputable, Mary Catherine Bohen--(who routinely pulls the wool over Riff--refusing to correct perjured statements-when brought to her attention-and own eveidence )____ add Riff's disregard for the best interest and safety, of the most vulnerable, children, victims of domestic violence, the disabled, the elderly_______

^^DEpt 77, Lawrence Riff's, RiffRAFF Courtroom, in a NUTshell....

#TommyMess -- #RiffRAFF

Litigant

Comment #: CA23129
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23124

Comment appropriate for Gould-Saltman sycophant, Lawrence Riff's page .


Comment #: CA23120 "Dianna and Richard Gould-Saltman, have an exaggerated sense of self-importance and entitlement; while expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance, with their expectations. Folie de grandeur..... -

--The Gould-Saltmans' don't think twice of taking advantage of others to get what they want; and are known to get impatient and angry, when they don't receive special treatment, while operating, as they are above the law and couldn't care less, with the consequences, of dragging others down with them.... "


^^Comment appropriate for Gould-Saltman sycophant, Lawrence Riff's page ....

The Gould-Salman , Trent Lewis synchophant, Lawrence Riff, has also caused so much harm to many-- his lack of knowledge of family law, appearences of quid pro quo corruption , impropriety, improper his ex parte communications-- with Judge Dianna Gould Saltman, who should NEVER have been discussing the case with him. --------

Lawrence Riff's courtoom is riddled with incompetance, perjury by attorneys', abuses of power, quid pro quo corruption , conspiracy to obstruct justice, undue influences by Trent Lewis among many other things. Dianna and Richard Gould-Salman , caused so much harm to so many; while involing judges like Lawrence Riff in their schemes, while displaying strong appearences of "expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance", --

Tthis comment is perfect on Lawrence Riff's page--- because hestrongly appears, connected to the Gould-Saltman' misconduct, wrongdoings, conspircy to obstruct justice and outcome of case....


. These co-conspirator, onstructors of justice need to be throughly investigatied by an*** impartial group of investigaters, not one of their equally corrupt cronies."

^^These criminals and criminal enterprise of corrupt family judges and lawyers, are way too closely connected and attached at the hip -one key short of a federal prison cell.

Other

Comment #: CA23124
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment appropriate for Gould-Saltman sycophant, Lawrence Riff's page .


Comment #: CA23120 "Dianna and Richard Gould-Saltman, have an exaggerated sense of self-importance and entitlement; while expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance, with their expectations. Folie de grandeur..... -

--The Gould-Saltmans' don't think twice of taking advantage of others to get what they want; and are known to get impatient and angry, when they don't receive special treatment, while operating, as they are above the law and couldn't care less, with the consequences, of dragging others down with them.... "


^^Comment appropriate for Gould-Saltman sycophant, Lawrence Riff's page ....

The Gould-Salman , Trent Lewis synchophant, Lawrence Riff, has also caused so much harm to many-- his lack of knowledge of family law, appearences of quid pro quo corruption , impropriety, improper his ex parte communications-- with Judge Dianna Gould Saltman, who should NEVER have been discussing the case with him. --------

Lawrence Riff's courtoom is riddled with incompetance, perjury by attorneys', abuses of power, quid pro quo corruption , conspiracy to obstruct justice, undue influences by Trent Lewis among many other things. Dianna and Richard Gould-Salman , caused so much harm to so many; while involing judges like Lawrence Riff in their schemes, while displaying strong appearences of "expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance", --

Tthis comment is perfect on Lawrence Riff's page--- because hestrongly appears, connected to the Gould-Saltman' misconduct, wrongdoings, conspircy to obstruct justice and outcome of case....


. These co-conspirator, onstructors of justice need to be throughly investigatied by an*** impartial group of investigaters, not one of their equally corrupt cronies.

Other

Comment #: CA23123
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23120


"Dianna and Richard Gould-Saltman, have an exaggerated sense of self-importance and entitlement; while expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance, with their expectations. Folie de grandeur.....

---The Gould-Saltmans' don't think twice of taking advantage of others to get what they want; and are known to get impatient and angry, when they don't receive special treatment, while operating, as they are above the law and couldn't care less, with the consequences, of dragging others down with them.... "


^^Comment appropriate for Gould-Saltman sycophant, Lawrence Riff....

The Gould-Salman , Trent Lewis synchophant, Lawrence Riff, has also caused so much harm to many-- his lack of knowledge of family law, appearences of quid pro qup, impropriety, improper his ex parte communications-- with Judge Dianna Gould Saltman, who should have been discussing the case with him.

Lawrence Riff's courtoom is riddled with incompetance, perjury by attorneys', abuses of power, quid pro quo corruption , conspiracy to obstruct justice, undue influences by Trent Lewis among many other things.

Dianna and Richard Gould-Salman , caused so much harm to so many; while involing judges like Lawrence Riff in their schemes, while displaying strong appearences of "expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance", -- this comment is perfect on his page--- because he is connected to their conduct, conspircy to obstruct justice and outcome of case.


These co-conspirator, onstuctors of justice need to be throughly investigatied by an*** impartial group of investigaters, bot one of their equally corrupt cronies.

Other

Comment #: CA23120
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23118


"Dianna and Richard Gould-Saltman, have an exaggerated sense of self-importance and entitlement; while expecting special favors and unquestioning compliance, with their expectations. Folie de grandeur.....

---The Gould-Saltmans' don't think twice of taking advantage of others to get what they want; and are known to get impatient and angry, when they don't receive special treatment, while operating, as they are above the law and couldn't care less, with the consequences, of dragging others down with them....


--They are boastful and have exaggerated, sense of self-importance and admiration by others, obsession with domination of others, obsessed with the exercise of power, while fully abusing it...

-- They appear to be envious of others and seem to wrongly believe, others envy them; while they are known to belittle others, to make themselves appear superior .....

---- The Gould-Saltmans appear to have fragile egos, vulnerable to the slightest criticism, even about comments written, relating to the very own conduct."

^^ "So very, accurrate. Cleverness by its design and
ingeniousness. The quality of being "superior", lies within the precision and truth, of this comment and other comments. Truth to power"

^^YES!

^^Bulls-eye

Other

Comment #: CA23119
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
--Judge Lawrence Riff; Judicial incompetance , at the highest level.-

--Lawrence Riff had ONE job.....

__How can Lawrence Riff ever be trusted, relating to anything/ everything?....

- How can Lawrence Riff ever be trusted, relating to rulings,....civil liberties,...protections for the disabled,...protections for children... protections for victims of domestic violence....protections for Constitutionally protected civil liberties,....protections for respect of the rule of law and settled law.... the evidence and facts in the case..... respect for Judicial Canonss....anything....how can Lawrence Riff be trusted? .....

-Lawrence Riff had ONE job.....

Litigant

Comment #: CA23094
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Did y’all hear about the federal court judge that held the entire Kansas US Attorneys office In contempt of court this week for violating the 6th amendment rights of litigants in custody?

Yah.

So glad the Los Angeles Superior Court is being investigated by the Feds. It’s only a matter of time before that stinking hell hole will be turned upside down and public officials get dragged out in handcuffs.

Other

Comment #: CA23093
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23092

"Make no mistake-Richard and Dianna Gould Saltman, unjustly gained financially, with dark money in their deep pockets-- with the questionable help of Lawrence Riff, Trent Lewis and others (when Dianna Gould Saltman, should have never been near my case- discussing it-- or soliciting favors from colleagues)

The fact that Dianna Gould-Saltman, financially benefited by the money of her attorney husband- that my ex paid him--Richard Gould Saltman-- while laws were broken-with strong appearence's of improper quid pro quo, ex parte communications-- and conspiracy to obstruct justice-- besides mail-wife fraud- (seems there is, arguably-- bribery and pay to play). ---

My ex. and Lawrence Riff made my life exponentially worse- and now I am homeless; and he is living in a very high end place-with a concierge; and the Gould-Saltmans; -greatly benefitted-- includong financially-- as judges catered unethically, illegally to their every illegal, unethical whims, sense of entitlement an egos.

How could this not give the appearence of bribery??--

My ex paid Richard Gould Saltman - and while he also remained on the case-after my ex released him and hired Richard's friend (while Richard Gould-Saltman remained duplicitously on the case--guilty much?)--- so I was going against all these abusers of power-- attorneys' with judge connections (all of them as a pro per- including going against my abusive ex). --- --

Does not pass the smell and optics test. "

^OMG it doesn't --this should involve the DOJ-FBI- the CJP- the State Bar- the AG- The State's Attorney ,
US Attorney - Federal Courts-- OMG. They'll never be able to keep the same "open secrets" straight-the lies-the cover-ups, they are obviously not smart- because they are so obvious and it got this far.

Litigant

Comment #: CA23092
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Make no mistake-Richard and Dianna Gould Saltman, unjustly gained financially, with dark money in their deep pockets-- with the questionable help of Lawrence Riff, Trent Lewis and others (when Dianna Gould Saltman, should have never been near my case- discussing it-- or soliciting favors from colleagues)

The fact that Dianna Gould-Saltman, financially benefited by the money of her attorney husband- that my ex paid him--Richard Gould Saltman-- while laws were broken-with strong appearence's of improper quid pro quo, ex parte communications-- and conspiracy to obstruct justice-- besides mail-wife fraud- (seems there is, arguably-- bribery and pay to play). ---

My ex. and Lawrence Riff made my life exponentially worse- and now I am homeless; and he is living in a very high end place-with a concierge; and the Gould-Saltmans; -greatly benefitted-- includong financially-- as judges catered unethically, illegally to their every illegal, unethical whims, sense of entitlement an egos.

How could this not give the appearence of bribery??--

My ex paid Richard Gould Saltman - and while he also remained on the case-after my ex released him and hired Richard's friend (while Richard Gould-Saltman remained duplicitously on the case--guilty much?)--- so I was going against all these abusers of power-- attorneys' with judge connections (all of them as a pro per- including going against my abusive ex). --- --

Does not pass the smell and optics test.

Litigant

Comment #: CA23091
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Make no mistake-Richard and Dianna Gould Saltman unjustly gained financially, with dark money in their deep pockets-- with the quetionable help of Lawrence Riff ,mTrent Lewis and others(when Dianna GouldSaltmanshould have never been near my case- discusiing it-- or soliciting favors from colleaguesa)

The fact that Dianna Gould-Saltman financially benefitted by the money of her attorney husband- that my ex paid him--Richard Gould Saltman-- while laws were broken-with stong appearences of impeoper quid pro quo, wex parte communications-- and conspiacy to obrtuct justice-- besides mail-wife fraud- (is there questionable bribery and pay to play)?

My ex paid the attorney spouse of a family judge -- he committed perjury, domestic violence, his hundreds of thousands in assets, violated discovery, violated a Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum for discovery-- his attorneys; repaetadlty committed perjury of material facts (contradicting their judical notice -an deven judicial notice of me bringing this perjury to their attention) which they repeated , instead of correcting in a (SEC473)--

How could this not give the appearence of bribery when my ex paid Richard Gould Saltman - and while he also remained on the case-after my ex relaesed him????? Does not pass the smell and optics test.

Litigant

Comment #: CA23090
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Lawrence Riff fails to grasp, the fact that abusive men (like my ex.) often present themselves, as likable, calm, "reasonable" people in court,, and often play the role of "hurt, misunderstood victim" (even though my ex. , when tangled in lies , admitted to horrific acts of abuse) against me- (after years of verified denials ..)


For some reason even a male (my abusive ex.) who is physically violent , often in the presence of the children, is not considered a bad role model, by judges like Riff and cronies;.... while arguably, drug dealer would be in their minds, even though abusers, do at least as much (or more) damage in society...

Although, I do not wish anyone to be assaulted; I would take an educated guess if even one incident-happened (just once) --- against Lawrence Riff, Christine Byrd, Trent Lewis or the Gould Saltmans' or to a child, loved one of theirs -- they would be outraged and seek the full extent of the law-- and would not rest until justice was served and achieved....... .


But, Lawrence Riff , does seem to grasp, the solicitation of quid pro quo, favors by the Gould-Saltmans' and grasps the undue influence, of his supervisor, Thomas Trent Lewis, who is a friend of the Gould-Saltmans'. --

Judge Scott Gordon, family law judge and Board Memeber of Judicial Council , is also a good friend of the Gould-Saltmans'. Talk about glaring conflicts of interest, cronyism, nepotism --etc.(besides the fact a family law judge- her attorney husband)--huh??? And. all of their abusses against one self-represented, disabled liigant ansd abuse victim-- (now add homeless- and elderly abuse-- after the tainted protracted litigation.)------

Scott Gordon was the judge I was initially assigned to--in November 2013-- for an early 2014, hearing in my post judgment case-- but then disastrous Tamara Hall took the spot. However, again, Scott Gordon is friends with the Gould-Saltmans'. This is egregiously how long it has gone on.


As a result, of the Gould-Saltman, Trent Lewis Riff, Byrd--"pay to play"----Lawrence Riff and Trent Lewis,selectively tend to hold my abusive ex.,and other fathers, well funded abusive males, abusive attorneys', themselves [Riff and Trent Lewis and other judges, attorneys'), to much lower standards, than pro pers, females, mothers , victims, the disabled are held to, in the family courts-------

My abusive ex . easily discerned , the family court’s [ Lawrence Riff, Trent Lewis , Christine Byrd] lack of will and effort and influence by the Gould Saltmans', to hold him (my ex) to proper standards, with the sad result, is now that my abuser, now feels even more emboldened

Thus in order to persuade the court, Lawrence Riff, Byrd , Hall to take seriously the my ex's abuse, I was forced to work quadruple hard. in attempt to get the court unstuck on the notion, he and his attorney had free reign of the courtroom--but to no avail., even after my ex. finally admitted to everything I had been saying all along,

So to help out my ex. and the Gould Saltmans'- Christine Byrd disparaged, demeaned me- tell me I am "not credible" am "mental"-- even though my ex violently beat the sh** out of me (and I am the "mental"; one? My ex lied -committed perjury for years-- (then admitted to what I had been saying is true) but I am the one who is not credible"?

Can someone say RIGGED - as quickly as the DOJ and the feds should be knocking on the doors , in the early morning-of these judges and equally corrupt lawyers?

These statements by corrupt judges and lawyers frequently occurr-- and use them to cover up their corruption, false record--as an excuse to ignore most well-documented abuse.--"disgruntled litigant" "bitter:- NO MORE !!

What will they do-- when my protected ex. goes after them, to get his money back-- because he shouldn't pay for lawyers and judges to commit crimes for him-- he will arguably plead ignorance-- KARMA--

Litigant

Comment #: CA23089
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Lawrence Riff has zero understanding, of family law, Family Codes,statutes, Domestic Violence , and appears to have misogynistic outdated beliefs, combined with prejudices against female litigant an pro pers.........

Just as when Riff, failed me and protected my violent ex.; even after my abusive ex. admitted to numerous acts of abuse, after years of perjured statements made-across state lines, while nuerous falsities also placed in the US Mail--Postal Service----and false statements were also electronically filed.. .....

Judge Lawrence Riff selectively tends to be "unaware" of the following:

--The well-established profile of my abusive ex. and other (abusive men); and the fact that his tendencies toward anger, violence, lack of impulse control and similar characteristics, have profound implications on the victims (like me) and for derivative victim children, who have also been traumatized, by my ex. and any male's abusiveness ......

-- Judge Lawrence Riff, allowed the widespread tendency among abusive ex. and his abusive lawyers, to commit repeated perjury, repeatedly violate court rules, repeatedly violate civil procedures (even after my ex's admissions to the domestic violence and abuse) and ignored their tendency, to repeatedly undermine the court process and administration of justice.......

My ex. also repeatedly also undermined my authority with the children, in attempts to damage relationships with my children and did not blink at underming the authority of the court-- as they played to his whims and desires-- especially after hiring a cleeagues husband as his attorney(while he Gould-Saltmans') financially, unjustly benefitted from their deep pockets filled with dark money-- as I lost everything, fro this protracted litiation full of corruption , perjury, conspiracy to obstruct justice- bu my ex, his slomy lawyers, Riff, Byrs The Gould-Saltmans' (others) ...


Lawrence Riff seems to fail to grasp the extremely high rate of recidivism in domestic abuse ;and extremely low rate of change in abusive men., like my ex. Except among those abusers, who are mandated to participate for an extended period of time, in a specialized anger management course--or group therapy or abusers; often in combination, with criminal prosecution... which Riff failed to order.

Riff failed to order or mandate my ex to attend anger managemet classes ... zero-- not even a slap on the wrist...(but didn't care if my ex. slapped me on the wrist, and other body parts)...along with punching, strangling etc. ....

Stats prove, abusive men have far higher rates of abusing the most vulnerable in society, more than other men do....

Lawrence Riff also fails to grasp--The fact that being a target of chronic violence and abuse, can leave a woman (me) with many emotional scars and lifetime after-effects, as well as physical, financial; as it has done to me--with the unethical, egregious rulings of Lawrence Riff (and his partners;in crime-Byrd, Trent Lewis, the Gould Saltmans')-- all must be held to account.

Other

Comment #: CA23086
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Fox News: Moonlight Fire Federal Court Corruption Scandal Eastern District of California-U.S. Courts Published on Jan 18, 2015 "Why Every American Should Care About California's Moonlight Fire Case: Fox News Dec. 4, 2014.

The Sierra Pacific Moonlight Fire case alleges egregious, systemic government misconduct, including misconduct by judges from Sacramento Federal Court, Eastern District of California – U.S. District Courts. Similar to the Moonlight Fire federal case, Sacramento Superior Court whistleblowers assert that judges of the federal US District Court in Sacramento (1)***individually and (2)***collectively are responsible for the (3) ***concealment of systemic civil rights violations, (4)***honest services fraud, and (5)***RICO racketeering by Sacramento Superior Court (6)***family law judges and judge pro tem attorneys against
(7)***indigent, (8)***financially disadvantaged and (9)***disabled (10) ***pro per litigants.

For over 10 years, the USDC EDCA has (11)*** obstructed, impeded, and (12)***dismissed federal civil rights litigation, against the RICO enterprise conspirators..

^^ ***good information - there must be accountability- society and public opinion, has changed since this time-besides new legislation and social media.

Litigant

Comment #: CA23085
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Fox News: Moonlight Fire Federal Court Corruption Scandal Eastern District of California-U.S. Courts
Published on Jan 18, 2015


"Why Every American Should Care About California's Moonlight Fire Case: Fox News Dec. 4, 2014.


The Sierra Pacific Moonlight Fire case alleges egregious, systemic government misconduct, including misconduct by judges from Sacramento Federal Court, Eastern District of California – U.S. District Courts.


Similar to the Moonlight Fire federal case, Sacramento Superior Court whistleblowers assert that judges of the federal US District Court in Sacramento individually and collectively are responsible for the concealment of systemic civil rights violations, honest services fraud, and RICO racketeering by Sacramento Superior Court family law judges and judge pro tem attorneys against indigent, financially disadvantaged and disabled pro per litigants.

For over 10 years, the USDC EDCA has obstructed, impeded, and dismissed federal civil rights litigation, against the RICO enterprise conspirators..".

Other

Comment #: CA23084
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23077

"A SF California, judge is facing, Large criticism for releasing a violent suspect, who attacked a female, in a bizarre attack....


“Unfortunately, I think this is a real problem, and I think the judge made a real mistake,” said Mayor Breed. “This person is a danger to society at this time...”.....
..
.. The Public Defender, said the judge made the “sound decision” to release Mr. Vincent under the restrictive conditions, mandating that he get "help"--and ”Assertive Case Management in order to provide him the services he needs” in order to get the serious help that he needs..."….

---This is way more than Judge Riff did for me. I had to endure, repeated attacks my my violent ex. (which he finally admitted to, after perjured statements and harmful protracted litigation-- horrific violent acts, which has also left me permanently disabled , besides all the lifetime of after-–effects and PTSD.....


--Judge Riff never ordered my ex to seek help or even remedy me... Judge Riff outrageously victim blamed me-- did a major disservice and harm, to me, the public, my ex who so desperately needs help , as well as mu ex's new partner; also likely a victim... I had to sit through (as well as my abusive ex's new partner) Judge Riff's victim blaming of me, protecting my ex-- without giving him a slap on the wrist or ordering him to go to 'anger management" classes...
--

---Then astonishing in his ruling-- Lawrence falsely stated, that Domestic Violence never occurred (despite my ex's admissions) and that I was not "permanently disabled"- despite Social Security Administrative Judge, doctor Vocational Specialist ruling......


--This is what happens when Thomas Trent Lewis, unduly influences subordinate judges, to help his allies, like the Gould-Saltmans' and Lawrence Riff, willfully acquiesced, at the illegal, unethical behest of the Gould-Saltmans', in the fraud on the court and conspiracy to obstruct justice and honest services fraud -causing another #TommyMESS of LA family courts. ----
---Not to mention, Lawrence Riff and Trent Lewis, Misprision of a felony -RICO violations. ...

---I guarantee, my violent ex. and his perjuring, rule breaking. law breaking , slimy lawyers (are not worth it)-

-----I guarantee, my violent ex. and his perjuring, rule breaking. law breaking , slimy lawyers"tricky Dick" Gould-Saltman's repeated perjury, frail ego and need to get his own way, Mary Catherine Bohen's willful pervasive perjury, to judges and in the papers, even contradicting her own evidence and Judicial Notice (while failing to correct this-when brought to her attention) ....--While Riff ignored the facts and evidence---


[Mary Catherine Bohen, tricky Dick Gould-Saltman and my abusive ex.] are not worth judicial "career suicide"- and risk to standing and reputation, or being investigated....--all the violations of state , federal law---they are not worth it.....

#TommyMESS..."

^ #RiffRAFF #RiffRaffMESS "


^^^^^^ Every victim must be remedied, by the wrongdoers; while justice, must be served.

Abuse victims, who are not getting any justice, because of Judge Riff's failure to act, appearances of impropriety, and by like minded judges; victims should then consider filing police reports, relating to the crimes committed against them.

Victims of domestic violence and abuse by their intimate parners, abuse by judges and lawyers; should also look into filing a civil suis , consider different, all applicable COA- and calsoonsider looking into the possibility of civil forfeiture of the perpetrator's
assets.

None of this, would proclude any victims, from filing a Stae Bar and-or CJP complaint.

Victims must use all legal measures, to take justice into their own hands, when judges like Lawrence Riff have dirt and blood on theirs.

Other

Comment #: CA23079
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23078

Riff-raff--disreputable

-- people who are not respectable, who engage in undesirable, engaging in untoward acts-

*(not to be confused with the rapper)
.
#RiffRaff

Other

Comment #: CA23078
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Riff-raff--disreputable

-- people who are not respectable, who engage in undesirable, untoward acts-

*(not to be confused with the rapper)

#RiffRaff

Other

Comment #: CA23077
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA23076

"A SF California, judge is facing, Large criticism for releasing a violent suspect, who attacked a female, in a bizarre attack....


This attack against the female, and judge’s decision to release the defendant, ahead of a scheduled hearing, today, elicited attention from the likes of city Mayor London Breed and California Governor Gavin Newsom, with SF, Mayor Breed commenting ,the male perpetrator, is a “danger” to the public....

“Unfortunately, I think this is a real problem, and I think the judge made a real mistake,” said Mayor Breed. “This person is a danger to society at this time...”.....
..
.. The Public Defender, said the judge made the “sound decision” to release Mr. Vincent under the restrictive conditions, mandating that he get "help"--and ”Assertive Case Management in order to provide him the services he needs” in order to get the serious help that he needs..."….

---This is way more than Judge Riff did for me. I had to endure, repeated attacks my my violent ex. (which he finally admitted to, after perjured statements and harmful protracted litigation-- horrific violent acts, which has also left me permanently disabled , besides all the lifetime of after-–effects and PTSD.....


--Judge Riff never ordered my ex to seek help or even remedy me... Judge Riff outrageously victim blamed me-- did a major disservice and harm, to me, the public, my ex who so desperately needs help , as well as mu ex's new partner; also likely a victim... I had to sit through (as well as my abusive ex's new partner) Judge Riff's victim blaming of me, protecting my ex-- without giving him a slap on the wrist or ordering him to go to 'anger management" classes...
--

---Then astonishing in his ruling-- Lawrence falsely stated, that Domestic Violence never occurred (despite my ex's admissions) and that I was not "permanently disabled"- despite Social Security Administrative Judge, doctor Vocational Specialist ruling......


--This is what happens when Thomas Trent Lewis, unduly influences subordinate judges, to help his allies, like the Gould-Saltmans' and Lawrence Riff, willfully acquiesced, at the illegal, unethical behest of the Gould-Saltmans', in the fraud on the court and conspiracy to obstruct justice and honest services fraud -causing another #TommyMESS of LA family courts. ----


---Not to mention, Lawrence Riff and Trent Lewis, Misprision of a felony -RICO violations. ...

---I guarantee, my violent ex. and his perjuring, rule breaking. law breaking , slimy lawyers (are not worth it)-----

-----I guarantee, my violent ex. and his perjuring, rule breaking. law breaking , slimy lawyers"tricky Dick" Gould-Saltman's repeated perjury, frail ego and need to get his own way, Mary Catherine Bohen's willful pervasive perjury, to judges and in the papers, even contradicting her own evidence and Judicial Notice (while failing to correct this-when brought to her attention) ....--While Riff ignored the facts and evidence---


[Mary Catherine Bohen, tricky Dick Gould-Saltman and my abusive ex.] are not worth judicial "career suicide"- and risk to standing and reputation, or being investigated....--all the violations of state , federal law---they are not worth it.....

#TommyMESS..."

^ #RiffRAFF #RiffRaffMESS

Litigant

Comment #: CA23076
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A SF California, judge is facing, Large criticism for releasing a violent suspect, who attacked a female, in a bizarre attack....

A 25 year old, homeless violent male, making bizarre rants , harmfully attacked a female, in her condo, last Sunday morning, which was caught on tape, sparking controversy in San Francisco, after the judge’s decision to release the defendant, ahead of a scheduled hearing, scheduled today.....


This attack against the female, and judge’s decision to release the defendant, ahead of a scheduled hearing, today, elicited attention from the likes of city Mayor London Breed and California Governor Gavin Newsom, with SF, Mayor Breed commenting ,the male perpetrator, is a “danger” to the public....

“Unfortunately, I think this is a real problem, and I think the judge made a real mistake,” said Mayor Breed. “This person is a danger to society at this time...”.....

Police say he’s the individual seen on footage attacking a woman in front of her condo building early, last Sunday morning, while making bizarre rants, while attempting to rob her of all her belongings. That person is seen grappling with the female victim, pulling her away from the front door of the building....

... The Public Defender, said the judge made the “sound decision” to release Mr. Vincent under the restrictive conditions, mandating that he get "help"--and ”Assertive Case Management in order to provide him the services he needs” in order to get the serious help that he needs..."….

---This is way more than Judge Riff did for me. I had to endure, repeated attacks my my violent ex. (which he finally admitted to, after perjured statements and harmful protracted litigation-- horrific violent acts, which has also left me permanently disabled , besides all the lifetime of after-–effects and PTSD.....


--Judge Riff never ordered my ex to seek help or even remedy me... Judge Riff outrageously victim blamed me-- did a major disservice and harm, to me, the public, my ex who so desperately needs help , as well as mu ex's new partner; also likely a victim... I had to sit through (as well as my abusive ex's new partner) Judge Riff's victim blaming of me, protecting my ex-- without giving him a slap on the wrist or ordering him to go to 'anger management" classes...
--

---Then astonishing in his ruling-- Lawrence falsely stated, that Domestic Violence never occurred (despite my ex's admissions) and that I was not "permanently disabled"- despite Social Security Administrative Judge, doctor Vocational Specialist ruling......


--This is what happens when Thomas Trent Lewis, unduly influences subordinate judges, to help his allies, like the Gould-Saltmans' and Lawrence Riff, willfully acquiesced, at the illegal, unethical behest of the Gould-Saltmans', in the fraud on the court and conspiracy to obstruct justice and honest services fraud -causing another #TommyMESS of LA family courts. ----


---Not to mention, Lawrence Riff and Trent Lewis, Misprision of a felony -RICO violations. ...



---I guarantee, my violent ex. and his perjuring, rule breaking. law breaking , slimy lawyers (are not worth it)-----


-----I guarantee, my violent ex. and his perjuring, rule breaking. law breaking , slimy lawyers"tricky Dick" Gould-Saltman's repeated perjury, frail ego and need to get his own way, Mary Catherine Bohen's willful pervasive perjury, to judges and in the papers, even contradicting her own evidence and Judicial Notice (while failing to correct this-when brought to her attention) ....


--While Riff ignored the facts and evidence-,[[Mary Catherine Bohen, tricky Dick Gould-Saltman and my abusive ex.] are not worth judicial "career suicide"- and risk to standing and reputation, or being investigated....--all the violations of state , federal law---they are not worth it.....

#TommyMESS...
.

Litigant

Comment #: CA23070
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A SF California, judge is facing, Large criticism for releasing a violent suspect, who attacked a female, in a bizarre attack....

A 25 year old, homeless violent male, making bizarre rants , harmfully attacked a female, in her condo, last Sunday morning, which was caught on tape, sparking controversy in San Francisco, after the judge’s decision to release the defendant, ahead of a scheduled hearing, scheduled today.....


This attack against the female, and judge’s decision to release the defendant, ahead of a scheduled hearing, today, elicited attention from the likes of city Mayor London Breed and California Governor Gavin Newsom, with SF, Mayor Breed commenting ,the male perpetrator, is a “danger” to the public....

“Unfortunately, I think this is a real problem, and I think the judge made a real mistake,” said Mayor Breed. “This person is a danger to society at this time...”.....

Police say he’s the individual seen on footage attacking a woman in front of her condo building early, last Sunday morning, while making bizarre rants, while attempting to rob her of all her belongings. That person is seen grappling with the female victim, pulling her away from the front door of the building....


--The guard working on the security desk, got on a cell phone while attempting to help the woman escape.... The Public Defender, said the judge made the “sound decision” to release Mr. Vincent under the restrictive conditions, mandating that he get "help"--and ”Assertive Case Management in order to provide him the services he needs” in order to get the serious help that he needs..."….

---This is way more than Judge Riff did for me. I had to endure, repeated attacks my my violent ex. (which he finally admitted to, after perjured statements and harmful protracted litigation-- horrific violent acts, which has also left me permanently disabled , besides all the lifetime of after-–effects and PTSD.....


--Judge Riff never ordered my ex to seek help or even remedy me... Judge Riff outrageously victim blamed me-- did a major disservice and harm, to me, the public, my ex who so desperately needs help , as well as mu ex's new partner; also likely a victim... I had to sit through (as well as my abusive ex's new partner) Judge Riff's victim blaming of me, protecting my ex-- without giving him a slap on the wrist or ordering him to go to 'anger management" classes...
--

---Then astonishing in his ruling-- Lawrence falsely stated, that Domestic Violence never occurred (despite my ex's admissions) and that I was not "permanently disabled"- despite Social Security Administrative Judge, doctor Vocational Specialist ruling......


--This is what happens when Thomas Trent Lewis, unduly influences subordinate judges, to help his allies, like the Gould-Saltmans' and Lawrence Riff, willfully acquiesced, at the illegal, unethical behest of the Gould-Saltmans', in the fraud on the court and conspiracy to obstruct justice and honest services fraud -causing another TommyMESS of LA family courts. Not to mention, Lawrence Riff and Trent Lewis, Misprision of a felony -RICO violations. I guarantee, my violent ex. and "tricky Dick" Gould-Saltman's frail ego and need to get his own way, Mary Catherine Bohen's willful pervasive perjury, to judges and in the papers, even contradicting her own evidence and Judicial Notice (while failing t correct this-when brought to her attention) -while Riff ignored the facts and evidence-,[[Mary Catherine Bohen, tricky Dick Gould-Saltman and my abusive ex.] are not worth judicial "career suicide"- and risk to standing and reputation, or being investigated....--all the violations of state , federal law---they are not worth it.....

#TommyMESS...

Litigant

Comment #: CA23069
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A SF California, judge is facing, Large criticism for releasing a violent suspect, who attacked a female, in a bizarre attack....

A 25 year old, homeless violent male, making bizarre rants , harmfully attacked a female, in her condo, last Sunday morning, which was caught on tape, sparking controversy in San Francisco, after the judge’s decision to release the defendant, ahead of a scheduled hearing, scheduled today.....

This attack against the female, and judge’s decision to release the defendant, ahead of a scheduled hearing, today, elicited attention from the likes of city Mayor London Breed and California Governor Gavin Newsom, with SF, Mayor Breed commenting ,the male perpetrator, is a “danger” to the public....


“Unfortunately, I think this is a real problem, and I think the judge made a real mistake,” said Mayor Breed. “This person is a danger to society at this time...”.....

Police say he’s the individual seen on footage attacking a woman in front of her condo building early, last Sunday morning, while making bizarre rants, while attempting to rob her of all her belongings.
That person is seen grappling with the female victim, pulling her away from the front door of the building. The guard working on the security desk, got on a cell phone while attempting to help the woman escape....

The Public Defender, said the judge made the “sound decision” to release Mr. Vincent under the restrictive conditions, mandating that he get "help"--and ”Assertive Case Management in order to provide him the services he needs” in order to get the serious help that he needs..."….

This is way more than Judge Riff did for me. I had to endure, repeated attacks my my violent ex. (which he finally admitted to, after perjured statements and harmful protracted litigation-- horrific violent acts, which has also left me permanently disabled , besides all the lifetime of after-–effects and PTSD.....

--Judge Riff never ordered my ex to seek help or even remedy me... Judge Riff outrageously victim blamed me-- did a major disservice and harm, to me, the public, my ex who so desperately needs help , as well as mu ex's new partner; also likely a victim...



I had to sit through (as well as my abusive ex's new partner) Judge Riff's victim blaming of me, protecting my ex-- without giving him a slap on the wrist or ordering him to go to 'anger management" classes...

Then astonishing in his ruling-- Lawrence falsely stated, that Domestic Violence never occurred (despite my ex's admissions) and that I was not "permanently disabled"- despite Social Security Administrative Judge, doctor Vocational Specialist ruling......

This is what happens when Thomas Trent Lewis, unduly influences subordinate judges, to help his allies, like the Gould-Saltmans' and Lawrence Riff, willfully acquiesced, at the illegal, unethical behest of the Gould-Saltmans', in the fraud on the court and conspiracy to obstruct justice and honest services fraud -causing another TommyMESS of LA family courts.


Not to mention, Lawrence Riff and Trent Lewis, Misprision of a felony -RICO violations. I guarantee, my violent ex. and "tricky Dick" Gould-Saltman's frail ego and need to get his own way, are not worth "career suicide"- and risk to standing and reputation.

#TommyMESS...

Chaos and corruption of ThoMESS Trent Lewis and the LA family courts, in the lives of victims, chidren and private citizens.......

Other

Comment #: CA21316
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Dam” means any artificial barrier, together with appurtenant works, which does or may impound or divert water, and which either (a) is or will be 25 feet or more in height from the natural bed of the stream or watercourse at the downstream toe of the barrier, as determined by the department, or from the lowest elevation of the outside limit of the barrier, as determined by the department, if it is not across a stream channel or watercourse, to the maximum possible water storage elevation or (b) has or will have an impounding capacity of 50 acre-feet or more.

Court Staff

Comment #: CA19446
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I am tired of this bullshit and I am going to law enforcement. You are the criminal!

Other

Comment #: CA18970
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
If u have half a brain left, you'd contact the LB office FBI and turn state's evidence. Ur legacy can be saved if you have the courage. I actually atill have faith in you.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA17544
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Highly professional, evenhandedness judge, who listen carefully both parties

Other

Comment #: CA12608
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Knows no family law
is not judicious
is biased towards female attorneys
avoids enforcing court orders
does not take domestic violence seriosly