Hon. Lynn H. Scaduto See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Lynn H. Scaduto


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA22457
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In disbelief that a Judge with her educational background and experience was unable to figure out that EX was being untruthful while under oath. Instead, she granted EX more custody.
EX even went out of his way to provide false declarations against me of people that I probably seen no more than two times. This Judge believed EX. I have given my child 1000 percent of the attention and care child requires, meeting all needs. Lie Detector Test should be permissible in Family Law Court. The saddest part is, it’s a complete injustice to an innocent child when extremely attached to parent, and that parent that has truthfully more involved is pushed away. The best interest of the child is what suppose to be the primary focus in Family Court I pray for this Judge, to have clarity of mind and not to be blinded by people or high profile attorneys that are good story tellers to the point of fooling others. I am hopeful that this Judge will take the time to clearly hear both sides without being so quick to make judgment. The one that is greatly most affected is the innocent child. Judge’s decisions can terribly hurt the child by removing them from the parent that was truthful and more actively involved in all aspects. GOD is faithful, as he will see me through this injustice.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA21556
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Good luck getting a restraining order from this white Miss know it all! She should go be a social worker NOT a judge! I have NO doubt she is saving her restraining order cards for white high priced attorneys representing privileged clients!
Her clerk is the worse! He speaks rapidly with a major arrogance and an attitude! The judge & her clerk belong in a Comedy show NOT in the court room destroying lives and families!

Litigant

Comment #: CA21429
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I was not represented by counsel She straight up called me a liar to my face .I am offended bc big inky was I truthful in everything I said but the look on her face was of a bitter white woman
She placed judgement upon me based on other parties lies .She judged me on a car I was driving that was not even mine but the worse was to say she didn't believe a word from my mouth
Well I will be seeing her soon with all of the prof that she needs to show I am not a liar
She never even gave me a chance to speak
What a bitter evil human being

Litigant

Comment #: CA15312
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Horrible judge. Had absolutely no respect for the California rules of court or the CCP. Allowed opposing party to file and submit a responsive of declaration on the very day of the hearing. Would not even consider my attorneys objection. Then progress to make orders regarding support with a year and a half old income and expense declaration. When my attorney tried to object on grounds of untimeliness she overruled and would not even allow him to make a record. She is a horrendous judicial officer had should be nowhere near family law.

She is a judge with an ax to grind. Watching other cases it was obvious that she picks the sides and advocate on behalf no matter the law or the realities of the case. In another matter she allowed a party to move away with their son without providing any prior notice to opposing party OR even a court order. The move was out of state. The move was out of state.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA12124
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Completely didn't take the whole picture into account. My ex is supporting domestic violence of my son against me and now further abuse with custody child support that is unneeded as he makes much more then I.
Whole family court system is broken and they don't care about families or our children. Lawyers and judges out for our hard earned money. Rise up and get this system changed for the better.