Hon. Mary Kreber Varipapa See Rating Details
Superior Court
Orange County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Mary Kreber Varipapa



Comment #: CA49343
Discounts evidence if it doesn’t fit her predetermined outcome. Disregarded forensic medical evidence and put a young girl in the custody of her abuser who was a violent felon with confirmed drug and alcohol abuse. She should be disbarred at best. [redacted by Ed.]


Comment #: CA47302
The respondent played with the emotions of the judge, claiming that grandkids were barred from seeing a grandparent, when the "kids" are grown adults, and there is a reason why the grandparent doesn't want them in the house or to see them. The respondent can tell lie after lie on court papers, and it is held up as though it is truth. horrible.


Comment #: CA38151
This judges are all under oath. There no excuse. Stop depriving the people there rights to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.


Comment #: CA34609
Rating:Not Rated
Granted foster parents custody of my own flesh and blood. Karma is out there waiting for you!