Hon. Winston S. Keh See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Bernardino County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.4 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Winston S. Keh


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA53498
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Heartless judge!

Litigant

Comment #: CA53487
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Unjustly biased against historically minoritized groups (African American self-represented litigants) who cannot afford legal representation. From experiencing this judge's precedence over a frivolous lawsuit which should not have landed in trial court to begin with, it became evident Keh did not have the skill-set and knowledge as a "superior" judge to recognize the lawsuit lacked foundation, evidence to support claims, and immediately dismiss the case. Sadly enough, he does not care whether he is wasting taxpayers money. Hopefully, he is not reappointed to serve as a superior judge (anywhere in the state of CA) by Governor Newsom after his term ends on January 6, 2025.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA53471
Rating:1.1
Comments:
Very bias judge

Litigant

Comment #: CA53469
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Unjustly biased against historically minoritized groups (African American self-represented litigants) who cannot afford legal representation. From experiencing this judge's precedence over a frivolous lawsuit which should not have landed in trial court to begin with, it became evident Keh did not have the skill-set and knowledge as a "superior" judge to recognized the lawsuit lacked foundation, evidence to support claims, and immediately dismiss the case. Sadly enough, he does not care whether he is wasting taxpayers money. Hopefully, he is not appointed by Governor Newsom after his term ends on January 6, 2025.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA53006
Rating:3.7
Comments:
Really unusual rulings and unusually harsh criticism from this judge over simple discovery matters. Plus he made us listen to him complain about his workload and the workload of the court, which also inconveniences the attorneys and the litigants (which I guess he never thought about). I usually like the judges I run into in SBSC so really somewhat disappointed.

Other

Comment #: CA49099
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
On multiple occasions I have Sat in courtrooms listen to hearings presided over by Keh. He is not an independent arbiter. He is very bias against non-represented and minority litigants. He is intellectually dishonest. Among many others, he causes the judicial assistant and court reporter to alter hearing proceedings to favor corporate litigants and parties represented by counsels, after hearings. He is unfit to sit on the judicial bench.

Litigant

Comment #: CA36170
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I have no reason not to point a finger at him and his staff for being corrupt and enriching themselves by stealing from common citizenry. I read an article about him When he got appointed by the governor. The title of article was "rags to robes". This was wrong title
The actual title should be "rags to riches". My car was illegally towed during lock down by hoa.once the lock down was lifted and courts opened i filed an action Against hoa. I served them and also served suponea for personal appearance and production of documents. First hearing the opposing party didnot show up ,judge said let Me send them another notice and he scheduled another hearing.ordered clerk to send another summons and suponea to the opposing party .second hearing the party didnot show up again. I showed judge my evidence and answered any questions he had . I went all prepared to cross examine the Other side challenge their evidence etc. But Since they didnot show up i should have gotten a decision in my favor.judge decided to reserve his decision which was very surprising to me . Then i get a judgement in Mail saying i didnot carry the burden of proof.i was flabberghasted. I was the victim of Illegal tow .the Other psrty was suppose to prove that their action was legit and show how i was in violation of law .I asked judge to change his decision because that violated my right to my property .i asked the judge that other party didnot even showed up to defend their action and what burden i didnot carry i showed you the documemts of ownership and i am the one who lost my car. How about other party showing no respect of court issued subponea for personal apoearance and production of docunents. On the subponea it says if you disobey it court will be fined and issued a Contempt of court. Judge sat on that request to change for days before declining my request and then all of sudden court started getting return Mail for me . I didnot change my address and i didnot move . Judge and his employees forgot that the mailing address which was fine few daYs ago is a po box address and there is no reason for return Mail . And i know this was done so i miss the deadline for appeal. I realised it happened because of judges collusion and contact with tow company .tow company auctioned off my car and got away witn this theft under the patronage of the great judge winston keh. I now realize why hoa didnot bother to show up at both hearings because they already knew What was going to happen. Their boy Winston is going to take care of the matters for them. He will make sure that 2600 dollar Check falls in their lap while they relax at home. Forget about that owner he can run up and down .all he is going to encounter is a wall. In broaddaylight without any fear and remorse He who has been chosen to protect weaker oppressed sections of society is going to rob him. Intoxicated with power and greed Winston forgot there will be a time when he will stand trial in gods court and will have to account for his deeds and their will be no tow company owner coming to his rescue.everyday he is in my thoughts for the damage and hardship he inflicted on me. I will never Forget how you are serving people of this country who welcomed you as immigrant and gave opportunity to be what you are . You turned around and started feasting on same people.