Hon. Victor Hwang See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Francisco County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.4 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Victor Hwang


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA40219
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Narc-friendly judge, and has an inability to make decisions after 2021:

Prior to December 2020, Judge Hwang made drastic decisions without clear foresight. It eventually led to an adult suicide and murder of a child. After that horrible situation, he stopped making any decisions at all, or acquiesced to settling for half of what one litigant asked for; regardless of what was right or wrong. I'm surprised that with his DV background, he couldn't recognize abusive litigants with respect to financial abuse, and child abuse as well. Overall, he was not a fair judge. This judge is so unqualified, that there are support groups that were created just because of the trauma he inflicted due to his poor judgement.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA39172
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Judge Hwang is technical. You need to have a researched position. He's fair and open to discourse. He doesn't suffer drama.he also doesn't suffer litigants that waste the court's valuable resources.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA34140
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge shows his bias. He prefers certain attorneys and allows them to disrespect the other side without interruption. If you happen to be on the other side you can't say anything without being considered disrespectful. The attorney that he favored called our side liars, yelled at us, and constantly interrupted us. However when we would try and interject, we were called rude.
It's sad that a bias individual has so much control and there's nothing we can do about it.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA34121
Rating:2.3
Comments:
does not read pleadings very well. Just makes decision based upon least work for him. Does not really know family law well. SF court is screwed up and he is part of the system.