Hon. Cory Woodward See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Kern County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Cory Woodward


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA5864
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Refused to allow me to have a court reporter in Family Law Court when I asked for when as I was paying for the court reporter. Intentionally ignored ALL facts and evidence, never knew what was going on, and refused to follow the CRC's, Government Codes, CCP's, even the fee making fraudulent and void orders while he was too busy have his sexual on goings with his court clerk during the court hearing in my civil and family law matters which is why he never knew what was going on. Lacks integrity and public trust and favored persons who practiced infidelity as he believe it was okay and not grounds to separate from your significant other. Most definitely had a conflict of interest and never informed litigants and counsel. He cannot be trusted in the garb he wears even when he does not wear that attire.