Hon. Kevin Clement Brazile See Rating Details
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.3 - 5 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Kevin Clement Brazile



Comment #: CA31349
Rating:Not Rated
Comment #: CA31347

....Judge Brazile needs to realize, that much of the material, false records and findings are memorialized in filings, placed in the U.S Mail, Wired and digitally scanned -in other numerous Title 18 violations, Honest Service's Fraud---beside many going all the way up to the Appellate Court, CA Supreme Court Federal District courts, etc.

....Add, all the complicity and accomplices, in the quid quo pro relationships, back door -extra-judicial communications/ dealings;along with obstruction of rightful outcomes of cases, in glaring miscarriages of justice.

--Civil liberties and due process rights , are being stomped on , in the family courts, against females, disproportionately impacted, the under-represented and the under-served.

.....Unlike many federal violations, by public servants in city hall, and Varsity Blue's scandal-- the civil liberties/due process violations within the LA county family courts, are incredibly serious, harmful, a danger to the public, as well as, public trust..

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA29410
Rating:Not Rated
Judge Brazile has been put on notice repeatedly about how rarely the law is followed in the LASC Family Courts, specifically by monsters like Commissioner Glenda Veasey of the Torrance Courthouse Department J, about whom Judge Brazile has received scores of complaints. Instead of doing anything to salvage the faith in our legal system of the Family Court's Victims, he allows the complaints to be ignored.
Veasey is an ogre who thinks nothing of violating basic constitutional rights.
On October 3, 2019, Veasey violated my due process rights and issued an order that has no basis in California law. That Veasey did these things has already been determined after a subsequent motion for reconsideration hearing by a different judge.
The Minute Order from the October 3 hearing says that my ex-wife was present for the hearing and that it was a hearing. Regardless, after taking 137 days to conduct an "investigation", despite Veasey having violated the Constitutions of the U.S. and California, despite Veasey having issued an unlawful order, and despite the Record explicitly saying it was a hearing at which only my ex-wife was present, Judge Brazile's designee to investigate the complaint decided that my ex-wife wasn't present and that it wasn't a hearing. He said that it was against Veasey's long-standing practice to hold ex parte hearings with one of the parties in her chambers. In so deciding, Brazile's designee implied that it is the custom and practice of Glenda Veasey to violate the 5th and 14th Amendments of the US Constitution and Article 1 ยง 7 of the California Constitution, and it is the custom and practice of Glenda Veasey to issue unlawful orders. The judicial officers of the LASC Family Courts are tyrants who freely violate the law with impunity because Judge Brazile allows it to continue.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11793
Here is a political affirmative action appointee.


Comment #: CA4482
Rating:Not Rated
He is very nice, but his clerk and C.A. are awful.
They are the rudest, meanest pair you will ever meet. It is unbelievable how he tolerates the horrible attitude that spews from his staff, every single day.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA3940
An intellectual lightweight who has his own agenda, for sure. It's a shame when competence ceases to be an important criterion for making judicial appointments.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA3568
A simpleton. Can't handle any issues that are too complex. I was not happy with the experience of being in trial in his courtroom. He's a pleasant man but easily persuaded by irrelevant arguments.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA1057
Has a friendly yet appropriately judicial temperament, understands the issues, is willing to listen to and consider oral argument, and is not afraid to change his mind from a tentative ruling if facts and law suggest it is appropriate.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA548
Very pleasant. Seems to care about the big picture.