Hon. James R. Dunn See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   9.1 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. James R. Dunn


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA5324
Rating:2.0
Comments:
I was a litigant/defendant in a civil case before Judge Dunn a few years ago. Both sides agreed to let Judge Dunn decide the case in lieu of a trial by jury.

Judd Dunn showed favoritism toward the plaintiff and his witnesses throughout the trial. He limited the witnesses we could call in our defense because his vacation was to start in another week. He also outwardly displayed animosity toward myself and counsel during the trial.

Additionally, Judge Dunn was not familiar with the ethos and mores of the organization involved in the civil suit. This was vital to to make a competent and informed decision. He ultimately decided in favor of the plaintiff.

As a result of his behavior during the trial, I filed a formal complaint with the California Judicial Commission. The Commission refused to investigate my complaint which I now understand is not unusual and necessitates a web site like the "Robing Room".

I would recommend anyone in trial with Judge Dunn to opt for a trial by jury. It is a lesson I learned too late!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4469
Rating:9.9
Comments:
I had a two week court trial in front of Judge Dunn that dealt with complex legal issues. Judge Dunn clearly worked hard to familiarize himself with the law and conducted himself with absolute integrity. He is without a doubt one of the finest trial court judges around.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA2369
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Great judge! Fair, good demeanor, thoughtful, smart, extremely high integrity (in fact that is his best quality!) and, I think one of the best judge's in Central.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1210
Rating:7.6
Comments:
Good, strong judge. You could do a lot worse at the Mosk Courthouse.