Hon. Michael B. Harwin See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   9.8 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Michael B. Harwin


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4554
Rating:9.9
Comments:
This is one of the best judges in the county, and in the country. It is very lucky to be assigned to him. He should be sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA1839
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I found him to be brisk and to the point. Not unpleasant at all. He was what I want a judge to be: fast, fair, polite but not mean and not overly nice. I don't want a judge who is "nice" but incompetent: he's had enough experience to know what he's doing w/o needing 20 pages of paper as well.

Other

Comment #: CA1632
Rating:1.0
Comments:
His title as JUDGE should be removed to EXECUTOR ,he is rude difiant very unpleasant and really very biased.
Do not aapear before him as justice will not prevail