Hon. Mary Thornton House See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.8 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Mary Thornton House


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA5962
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge makes her decisions based on opinion, not facts. This person is corrupt and does not base decisions on evidence but on how much a person cries in court. If you cry in her court saying you have been victimized she will believe you even though you have no real evidence to prove anything. She refuses looking at police reports, and is probably a closet racist due to the defendants who she rules against when the other party is white, she is a disgrace to what we still call a justice system.

Other

Comment #: CA4894
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is neglectful, biased, and more worried about her own personal time than about making a fair judgment. She doesn't fully examine all the evidence of both parties, and appears to come to conclusions more on a whim and less based on the actual evidence and defense.