Hon. Ann I. Jones See Rating Details
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   7.6 - 6 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Ann I. Jones



Comment #: CA6976
Rating:Not Rated
I appeared in a case before her, in pro per. I am a J.D. (but am not licensed) and have been a practicing paralegal for >29 years. I was extremely well-prepared, organized, and respectful. Too bad Judge Jones wasn't. She was condescending, ill-prepared, and cut me off about two minutes or less into argument. Opposing counsel got much more time and was treated with kid gloves.

I would affidavit her in a heartbeat.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA6641
I found her to be incredibly condescending and patronizing. She did not let me complete a sentence, nor did she appear to have read our moving papers. It is unclear on what basis she still holds her position.


Comment #: CA3253
Rating:Not Rated
I have to agree with the lawyer here who says Judge Jones thinks she knows more than she does. Very BAD judicial temperament. Rude and condescending. She cost me my drivers license for a year because she thought I was some dumb pro per who would not challenge her decision, which a first year law student would have realized was improper. I had her revered in a published decision by the California Court of Appeal. See:

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2659
Exceedingly bright. Reads the papers, grasps the issues. Is able to both give a fair hearing and move her calendar.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2402
This judge has one of the worst temperments I have experienced in 25 years of practice. She is quick to jump to a conclusion and won't change even if wrong. She thinks she knows more than she does. She ruled for my client (civil defendant)on some preliminary matters (and sanctioned the other side) and against my client on a demurrer. The case was eventually dismissed, but she could have dismissed at the demurrer stage and saved everyone hundreds of thousands of dollars. I would affidavit her in the future.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1992
Very fair, does her research, lets you know where she is leaning and why. Doesn't waste time.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1314
Very personable, professional, knows the law, and is fair. An excellent judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA95
Great judge. Fair but firm.