Hon. Luis A. Lavin See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.6 - 9 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Luis A. Lavin


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5500
Rating:1.9
Comments:
Insecure. Fails to listen past surface gloss arguments. Vacated on appeal.

Other

Comment #: CA5185
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Clearly made up his mind before even hearing the case. If you get him, start planning a writ or your appeal. He wants to be an appellate judge and will do nothing in the name of fairness. He will do what the establishment wants so he can become his dream of being an appellate judge. He flat out misinterprets the law and leaves important info out of his decisions in order to make sure you lose the case. He is gay so your only chance of winning is if your client is gay and there was a cause of action that hurt your client. Always bias and pro management, pro big corporation. Who ever has the most money wins in his court room.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5183
Rating:3.7
Comments:
He already has his mind made up prior to hearing entire case. Very finicky. He appears to be interested, however that is only an appearance. I don't trust him as a judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4932
Rating:3.6
Comments:
He is smart, conceited, and deferential to his law clerks in most cases. He prejudges and is impatient, but gives the appearance of fair-mindedness.

Court Staff

Comment #: CA4744
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He likes good looking men and hates women! He removed three mothers from their children, the day that I was in his courtroom, and the dads got custody!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4581
Rating:4.6
Comments:
He has a marked bias in favor of governmental entities -- to the point of fashioning theories on their behalf. Although he will listen patiently, and does read the papers, this judge is an advocate, not a neutral arbiter. In order to support the decision that he wants to reach, he will rely on patently inapposite cases.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4461
Rating:2.9
Comments:
Number of days my cat has practiced law in a private civil law firm: zero. Number of days Judge Lavin has practiced law in a private civil law firm: zero. Neither is qualified to judge civil controversies.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4458
Rating:6.5
Comments:
This judge is highly intelligent and well-prepared. He is overworked, so he does not take sufficient time to study the issues carefully. He is also very opinionated -- once he forms an opinion about an issue, he cannot understand his own errors when they are pointed out and will become defensive, so he loses objectivity in his defensiveness.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA3404
Rating:9.3
Comments:
I felt that he was thorough, really considered the facts and the law before him, understood the issues well even though it was outside of his usual area, respectful, and gave all sides plenty of opportunity to state their case. I feel like he was a little pro City/defendant. We were the opposing side and we won, but it should have been a slam dunk anyway because the City's position was extremely weak. Really.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2774
Rating:8.3
Comments:
Haven't a clue what CA2363 is talking about? He came across as intelligent, judicious, and confident of his abilities. I know Central District pretty well and this judge is nowhere near 170.6.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2363
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge should be removed from the bench. He outright lies on the bench, you will never get a fair hearing from him on anything. He's in the pocket.
170.6 ASAP