Hon. Nancy L. Newman See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.6 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Nancy L. Newman


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA7255
Rating:1.3
Comments:
how a Glendale, ca. insurance office attorney found her way for grey davis to appoint is a mystery

Other

Comment #: CA6673
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Horrible judge sides with landlord no matter if they are wrong and fraudulent! I had a business partner and informed OSM owner Michael Orwitz that I would not be renewing lease. Craig former business partner applied and got a new lease. 1 year later he failed to pay 2 months and was evicted. Later he paid 1 month and owed 1. They served an unlawful detainer without my knowledge on a business i no longer own. In addition I never received mail at that location (I had requested that when I was on the lease and -have the evidence). Kristi Gasaway attorney for OSM turned 2k into 12K. After recruiting help from a wonderful attorney friend we both felt it would obviously be thrown out for 1.I did not renew lease 2. I was never served 3. It was no longer my business. Well it was not judge Nancy L. Newmman from Santa Monica court upheld the unlawful detainer saying I had plenty of time to respond to something I was never aware no served with.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4295
Rating:9.9
Comments:
She is too nice, and allows lunatic pro per's to walk all over her and create a circus.