Hon. Charlaine F. Olmedo See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.2 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Charlaine F. Olmedo


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA5284
Rating:3.6
Comments:
Rude and dismissive of the carefully researched briefs of my attorney. then dismissed my attorney and personally prosecuted me without representation to afford gary Rosenthal an opportunity to present evidence or call any of my 11 witnesses including an expert court appointed dr. Rothberg by former attorney Cheryl nellon . Hon. Olmedo clearly plays favorites by dismissing attorneys from our trial without stating any reasons for doing so other than ruling they had "qualified immunity." Then, she refused our motion contrarily ordered remand to the state prison county of la twin towers facility at trial and in court and basically told some attorney she would not grant a motion to bail review our case before it was presented. When presented with several precedent decisions from other judges in the case law she said the facts were different without stating why they were different. We will be requesting a mandamus from the 2nd Circuit

Prosecutor

Comment #: CA1360
Rating:8.9
Comments:
Did a 2-defendant trial in her courtroom. Best temperament of any judge in the building. Will brew tea for the lawyers. Former DA and married to a sheriff's deputy, but does seem to bend over backwards for the defense at times.