Hon. Randy Rhodes See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.6 - 5 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Randy Rhodes


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4363
Rating:1.8
Comments:
Please hope you do not get this judge in a civil case if your lawyer fails to show up. He will shame you, which is extremely unprofessional. He looked at my brother-in-law standing in the courtroom, when the plaintiff was not even there and her attorney was only there "by phone," and said "you are not really here." My brother-in-law tried to tell the judge that he had just hired an attorney (who forgot to show up), and the judge demeaned him further, not even acknowledging the fact that his attorney blew it, not my brother-in-law. We are going to request a different judge! I heard that Judge Rhodes used to be a good judge when he was in San Fernando -- what happened? Is he burned out, or does he just hate civil cases?

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1359
Rating:8.5
Comments:
Excellent judicial temperament. He tries very hard to be fair to both sides - which can be frustrating at times. He will let you try your case. I'd have no hesitation to try either a plaintiff or defense case before him.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1063
Rating:1.7
Comments:
If you are a defendant in a medical malpractice case, he is your judge. He will allow defendants to stonewall plaintiffs with discovery to the point that you wonder if he ever read the intent of the Discovery Act. He will not give plaintiff's lawyers sanctions even after making findings that the defense's conduct made the motion to compel necessary. If you are a plaintiff's lawyer, you definitely do not want a court trial in front of him.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA142
Rating:1.4
Comments:
This judge ordered the defense attorney to turn over all clients' statements made to his attorney over to prosecution before trial.