Hon. Randolph Rogers See Rating Details
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   9.4 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Randolph Rogers


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA6191
Yes he can be tough on witnesses if they lose his confidence but he respects lawyers who are prepared and well versed. He works hard to understand complex matters and do the right thing by taking his time to carefully review the evidence and is willing to change his mind if the evidence so dictates. on complex civil matters he is by far one of the best judges I have seen in terms of analysis, hard work and judicious temperament.


Comment #: CA5882
This is the worst Judge in California history. I was in his courtroom Monday 09/29/2014. I was the defendant in the case, I have no idea what was wrong with this guy, but he believed the plaintiff word and never looked at the evidence, he told me he did not need to see anything from me because he believed her. She lied about everything except her name. This has to the worse judge I have ever met.


Comment #: CA5344
Judge did not seem committed to fining the truth of either testimony or evidence. He did not even bother to inquire the reason why the charge of fraud was brought against the plaintiff. The plaintiff submitted false testimony fraudulent
evidence and gave testimony that indicated likely intent to commit fraud and Judge issued no warnings and no probing questions to reconcile conflicting testimony.