Hon. Yvonne T. Sanchez See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.3 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   8.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Yvonne T. Sanchez


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4463
Rating:1.2
Comments:
Civil litigation at its worst!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2343
Rating:1.8
Comments:
Only appeared before her in law and motion and she is wishy-washy. She will not award sanctions, even in the most egregious of cases.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2300
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She refuses to order sanctions in civil cases under the most egregious circumstances. Doesn't seem to have a real good grasp of civil law and is indecisive. As a civil lawyer I would not want her to preside over my trial.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA2157
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge ruled against me in a request to have an arrest removed from my CII file, by holding me "accountable" for filing my petition with a "two year deadline" that I COULD NOT HAVE EVEN KNOWN OF! And it was simply to get an FTA arrest removed! Not very understanding for a NON-criminal issue!

Other

Comment #: CA250
Rating:8.0
Comments:
Good judge, not always defense oriented, but fair. During trials, she lets the lawyers run their respective cases and doesn't interject into either side's case, which any seasoned trial attorney will appreciate.