Hon. James E Blancarte See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.9 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. James E Blancarte


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA44544
Rating:1.0
Comments:
These are honest facts. This judge has earned 5 decisions to be corrected in appeals. I had this judge who is obviously not about the people, applying the law or helping the community with justice. Read the legal files. The judge cannot stay away from personal bias.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA37799
Rating:4.9
Comments:
I would never agree to this judge again. He is biased in favor of plaintiffs, refuses to make rulings required by well-established precedent, and believes judges should be an active participants in litigation.

Litigant

Comment #: CA36853
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge is a disgrace to the bench and the judiciary system. Does not read the motions and even if he does, he will not comprehend it. Has no respect for rule of the law as he does not understand the law.