"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Gia G Bosley	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Los Angeles County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 6.4 - 5 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 1 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

Confirm E-mail Address

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

What others have said about Hon. Gia G Bosley

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA52869
Rating:1.7

Comments:
Awful judge with a bias against black women. Which is surprising as she is a woman of color. Watched her disregard all the female defendants or victims and gave all her attention to male citizens in her court. She ruled against a woman who was a victim of DV and gave full custody to the assailant. Stripped the woman of all physical and legal custody without ever confirming the fathers occupation, place of residence, or addressing his long criminal history of violence. Seeing that judge deny every piece of evidence from the lady and not consider any of her facts, was hard to watch. It was heartbreaking to witness this child being ripped from their mother like that. I thought the point of these cases was to keep the child in the safest environment where they do well.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA47367
Rating:9.6

Comments:
She was very fair and truly listened to both sides. Defendant was given a lot of latitude - I think this was to ensure a fair trial for both sides. She listened intently to each witness testimony and judged fairly on all points that came up during trial. She is strict and all business. She only wants to hear facts and nothing else so come prepared. As per another comment - I am white - and felt she judged fairly.

Other

Comment #: CA46963
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Horrible

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA46909
Rating:10.0

Comments:
Great Judge. Very fair in her rulings

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA36710
Rating:1.2

Comments:
Judge Gia isn't even a Judge. She is an administrative Magistrate. She has sworn no oath to the US constitution and I doubt any of her colleagues have either.

She is a racist against white people. If you happen to be unfortunate enough to be a white defendant in front of her you had better 170.6 her fast or suffer her bias and prejudice.