Hon. Daniel M Crowley See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   9.5 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Daniel M Crowley


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA39610
Rating:9.0
Comments:
Excellent judge. His clerk (the one with the shrill voice yelling at everyone) needs a lesson on manners and professionalism.

Other

Comment #: CA36514
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A judicial wimp who looks the other way at discovery abuse. No matter how egregious, if the offending party serves responses before the hearing, he looks the other way and doesn't sanction, despite sanctions being mandatory and the CRC stating it doesn't matter if responses are served after the motion is filed. Plain and simple, he invites bad behavior because in this guy's courtroom, there are no consequences.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA36088
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Classic old-school sense of humor, no-nonsense. Probably one of the last honest men left on the bench today...